Risk factors for recurrence of periprosthetic joint infection following operative management: a cohort study with average 5-year follow-up.

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Annals of Joint Pub Date : 2022-09-26 eCollection Date: 2023-01-01 DOI:10.21037/aoj-22-4
Seper Ekhtiari, Aaron Gazendam, Ahmed Saidahmed, Danielle Petruccelli, Mitchell J Winemaker, Justin D de Beer, Vivek Shah, Thomas J Wood
{"title":"Risk factors for recurrence of periprosthetic joint infection following operative management: a cohort study with average 5-year follow-up.","authors":"Seper Ekhtiari, Aaron Gazendam, Ahmed Saidahmed, Danielle Petruccelli, Mitchell J Winemaker, Justin D de Beer, Vivek Shah, Thomas J Wood","doi":"10.21037/aoj-22-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain challenging to eradicate even after surgical management, which in most cases involves either debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) or single- or two-staged revision. The purpose of this study is to determine predictors of PJI recurrence after operative management for PJI, and to determine differences in recurrence-free survival between DAIR and staged revision.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of revision hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries due to PJI between 2011 and 2018 at an academic hospital. Any patient undergoing revision surgery for PJI was included except if the index surgery information was unknown. The primary outcome was confirmed PJI recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the relationship between the predictor variables and outcome variable. Log rank testing was used to compare recurrence-free survival between DAIR and staged revision.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>A total of 89 patients (91 joints) underwent revision surgery due to PJI. Younger age and presence of a sinus tract were statistically significant for risk of PJI recurrence. A multivariable logistic regression model including both variables was significant for predicting recurrence of PJI (χ<sup>2</sup>=10.2, P=0.006). Survival was not significantly different between patients who underwent DAIR versus a staged revision.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Younger patients and those with a chronic sinus tract are at significantly higher risk of recurrent PJI. This study also demonstrated that PJI can be successfully managed in the majority of cases with DAIR or staged revision.</p>","PeriodicalId":44459,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Joint","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10929461/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Joint","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21037/aoj-22-4","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2023/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) remain challenging to eradicate even after surgical management, which in most cases involves either debridement, antibiotics and implant retention (DAIR) or single- or two-staged revision. The purpose of this study is to determine predictors of PJI recurrence after operative management for PJI, and to determine differences in recurrence-free survival between DAIR and staged revision.

Methods: This is a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data of revision hip and knee arthroplasty surgeries due to PJI between 2011 and 2018 at an academic hospital. Any patient undergoing revision surgery for PJI was included except if the index surgery information was unknown. The primary outcome was confirmed PJI recurrence. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was utilized to determine the relationship between the predictor variables and outcome variable. Log rank testing was used to compare recurrence-free survival between DAIR and staged revision.

Results: A total of 89 patients (91 joints) underwent revision surgery due to PJI. Younger age and presence of a sinus tract were statistically significant for risk of PJI recurrence. A multivariable logistic regression model including both variables was significant for predicting recurrence of PJI (χ2=10.2, P=0.006). Survival was not significantly different between patients who underwent DAIR versus a staged revision.

Conclusions: Younger patients and those with a chronic sinus tract are at significantly higher risk of recurrent PJI. This study also demonstrated that PJI can be successfully managed in the majority of cases with DAIR or staged revision.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
术后假体周围感染复发的危险因素:一项平均5年随访的队列研究
背景:假体周围关节感染(PJI)即使在手术治疗后仍很难根除,在大多数情况下,手术治疗包括清创、抗生素和植入物保留(DAIR)或单阶段或双阶段翻修。本研究旨在确定 PJI 手术治疗后 PJI 复发的预测因素,并确定 DAIR 和分期翻修之间无复发生存率的差异:这是对一家学术医院 2011 年至 2018 年间因 PJI 而进行髋关节和膝关节翻修手术的前瞻性数据进行的回顾性分析。除指数手术信息未知外,所有因PJI接受翻修手术的患者均被纳入。主要结果为确诊的 PJI 复发。多变量逻辑回归分析用于确定预测变量与结果变量之间的关系。对数秩检验用于比较DAIR和分期翻修之间的无复发生存率:共有 89 名患者(91 个关节)因 PJI 接受了翻修手术。年龄较小和存在窦道对 PJI 复发风险有显著统计学意义。包括这两个变量的多变量逻辑回归模型对预测 PJI 复发有显著意义(χ2=10.2,P=0.006)。接受 DAIR 和分期翻修的患者的生存率没有明显差异:结论:年轻患者和患有慢性窦道的患者复发 PJI 的风险明显更高。本研究还表明,大多数病例都能通过 DAIR 或分期翻修成功控制 PJI。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Joint
Annals of Joint ORTHOPEDICS-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
-25.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Knee osteonecrosis after SARS-CoV-2 infection: a systematic case-based review. Evolving concepts in the treatment of posterior shoulder instability with glenohumeral bone loss Interpreting the pharmacological mechanisms of Juanbi recipe on rheumatoid arthritis through network pharmacology, molecular docking All-inside suture meniscal repair using suture passer. Postoperative healing and complications based on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft type.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1