Did the centers for medicare & medicaid services’ 2018 policy change removing total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list affect overall patient outcomes in the medicare population?

IF 0.2 Q4 ORTHOPEDICS Current Orthopaedic Practice Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1097/BCO.0000000000001200
Jonathan S. Yu, Jacob Zeitlin, H. Moore, A. Nocon, P. Sculco
{"title":"Did the centers for medicare & medicaid services’ 2018 policy change removing total knee arthroplasty from the inpatient-only list affect overall patient outcomes in the medicare population?","authors":"Jonathan S. Yu, Jacob Zeitlin, H. Moore, A. Nocon, P. Sculco","doi":"10.1097/BCO.0000000000001200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: The 2018 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient-Only (IPO) list was accompanied by confusion, lack of central guidance on patient selection criteria, payor misinterpretation of the updated policy, and altered payor incentives. The purpose of this study was to assess how the CMS policy change affected overall patient outcomes in the Medicare population after TKA. Methods: Using the ACS-NSQIP database, patients 65 years and older who underwent primary, elective, unilateral TKA without any significant medical comorbidity were included. Complication rates before (2014-2017) and after (2018-2019) CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list were compared using interrupted time series analysis to gauge the impact of the policy shift. Results: A total 185,294 TKA cases were included in the analysis. Following the CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list in 2018, there were significant decreases in rates of any adverse event (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, P=0.02), any minor adverse event (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, P=0.02), and thromboembolic events (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89, P<0.001) significantly decreased There were no significant changes in rates of readmission (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.05, P=0.31), reoperation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09, P=0.33), or any major adverse event (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.01, P=0.07). Conclusions: Though the CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list in 2018 was accompanied by the emergence of key new issues, the policy change did not adversely affect 30-day postoperative outcomes in the Medicare TKA patient population. Level of Evidence: Level IV—retrospective cohort study.","PeriodicalId":10732,"journal":{"name":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","volume":"34 1","pages":"97 - 102"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Current Orthopaedic Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/BCO.0000000000001200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ORTHOPEDICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: The 2018 Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) removal of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) from the Inpatient-Only (IPO) list was accompanied by confusion, lack of central guidance on patient selection criteria, payor misinterpretation of the updated policy, and altered payor incentives. The purpose of this study was to assess how the CMS policy change affected overall patient outcomes in the Medicare population after TKA. Methods: Using the ACS-NSQIP database, patients 65 years and older who underwent primary, elective, unilateral TKA without any significant medical comorbidity were included. Complication rates before (2014-2017) and after (2018-2019) CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list were compared using interrupted time series analysis to gauge the impact of the policy shift. Results: A total 185,294 TKA cases were included in the analysis. Following the CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list in 2018, there were significant decreases in rates of any adverse event (RR 0.90, 95% CI 0.83-0.98, P=0.02), any minor adverse event (RR 0.84, 95% CI 0.73-0.97, P=0.02), and thromboembolic events (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.64-0.89, P<0.001) significantly decreased There were no significant changes in rates of readmission (RR 0.95, 95% CI 0.87-1.05, P=0.31), reoperation (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.78-1.09, P=0.33), or any major adverse event (RR 0.92, 95% CI 0.83-1.01, P=0.07). Conclusions: Though the CMS removal of TKA from the IPO list in 2018 was accompanied by the emergence of key new issues, the policy change did not adversely affect 30-day postoperative outcomes in the Medicare TKA patient population. Level of Evidence: Level IV—retrospective cohort study.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心2018年的政策变化是否将全膝关节置换术从住院患者名单中删除,影响了医疗保险人群的总体患者结果?
背景:2018年医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)将全膝关节置换术(TKA)从仅住院(IPO)名单中删除,伴随着混乱、缺乏对患者选择标准的中央指导、付款人对更新政策的误解以及付款人激励措施的改变。本研究的目的是评估CMS政策的变化如何影响TKA后医疗保险人群的总体患者结果。方法:使用ACS-NSQIP数据库,纳入65岁及以上的患者,他们接受了原发性、选择性、单侧TKA,没有任何显著的医学共病。使用中断时间序列分析比较了CMS将TKA从IPO名单中删除之前(2014-2017年)和之后(2018-2019年)的并发症发生率,以衡量政策转变的影响。结果:共有185294例TKA病例纳入分析。2018年CMS将TKA从IPO名单中删除后,任何不良事件(RR 0.90,95%CI 0.83-0.98,P=0.02)、任何轻微不良事件(RR0.84,95%CI 0.73-0.97,P=0.02,血栓栓塞事件(RR 0.76,95%CI 0.64-0.89,P<0.001)显著降低再入院率(RR 0.95,95%CI 0.87-1.05,P=0.31)、再手术率(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.78-1.09,P=0.33)无显著变化,或任何重大不良事件(RR 0.92,95%CI 0.83-1.01,P=0.07)。结论:尽管2018年CMS将TKA从IPO名单中删除,同时出现了关键的新问题,但政策变化并未对医疗保险TKA患者群体的术后30天结果产生不利影响。证据水平:第四级——回顾性队列研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
107
期刊介绍: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins is a leading international publisher of professional health information for physicians, nurses, specialized clinicians and students. For a complete listing of titles currently published by Lippincott Williams & Wilkins and detailed information about print, online, and other offerings, please visit the LWW Online Store. Current Orthopaedic Practice is a peer-reviewed, general orthopaedic journal that translates clinical research into best practices for diagnosing, treating, and managing musculoskeletal disorders. The journal publishes original articles in the form of clinical research, invited special focus reviews and general reviews, as well as original articles on innovations in practice, case reports, point/counterpoint, and diagnostic imaging.
期刊最新文献
Machine learning review of hand surgery literature Jumpy stump syndrome treated by targeted muscle reinnervation (TMR): a case report and review of the literature Impact of COVID-19 on total hip arthroplasty: results from California state inpatient database Osteotomy via the prone transpsoas approach for lateral interbody fusion of the lumbar spine Orthopaedic surgery residency program ranking and the current state of leadership: what are the characteristics of the leaders in the “Top-tier” programs?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1