Educational programs for post-treatment breast cancer survivors: a systematic review

IF 0.5 4区 医学 Q4 OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY European journal of gynaecological oncology Pub Date : 2022-04-15 DOI:10.31083/j.ejgo4302036
K. Lin, C. Lengacher, C. Rodriguez, L. Szalacha, Jennifer R. Wolgemuth
{"title":"Educational programs for post-treatment breast cancer survivors: a systematic review","authors":"K. Lin, C. Lengacher, C. Rodriguez, L. Szalacha, Jennifer R. Wolgemuth","doi":"10.31083/j.ejgo4302036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives : The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the state of the scientific evidence related to educational programs for post-treatment breast cancer survivors (BCSs) during the last twenty years. Methods : A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases from January 2000 through May 2020 included keywords related to research on educational programs for BCSs. Inclusion criteria included: (1) focus on an educational program for post-treatment breast cancer survivors; (2) original research; (3) peer-review journals; (4) English language; and (5) published between January 2000 to May 2020. EndNote X9 (software version: X9, manufacturer: Clarivate, website location: endnote.com) was used as the reference management software package to manage citations from search results. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flowchart of the selection process is presented in this paper. Results : A total of 24 educational programs/interventions research studies include one mixed-method study, three qualitative studies, and twenty quantitative studies, were identified and analyzed. Three programs focused on BCSs’ self-management and self-efficacy, two programs focused on BCSs’ cognitive problems, seven programs focused on BCSs’ psychological distress, emotional support, and information seeking. In addition, one program focused on BCSs’ body image, body function, and sexual dysfunction issues, five programs focused on BCSs’ physical activities, nutritional levels, and normal body weight maintenance, two programs focused on BCSs’ supportive care and peer advocate support. Finally, one program focused on BCSs’ palliative care and end of life care, and three programs focused on BCSs’ post-treatment symptom clusters and overall quality of life. Conclusions : After breast cancer treatment ends, BCSs continue to suffer from long-term physical and psychological symptoms and report multiple unmet needs. Research on post-treatment breast cancer educational programs showed that programs assist BCSs with post-treatment symptom management and address their concerns while promoting supportive care and peer support to improve BCS’s overall quality of life. program. Study to explore experiences of waist of the end of of the in BMI and waist circumference a healthy","PeriodicalId":11903,"journal":{"name":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European journal of gynaecological oncology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31083/j.ejgo4302036","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objectives : The purpose of this systematic review was to identify the state of the scientific evidence related to educational programs for post-treatment breast cancer survivors (BCSs) during the last twenty years. Methods : A systematic search of PubMed/MEDLINE, CINAHL, EMBASE, Web of Science, and PsycINFO databases from January 2000 through May 2020 included keywords related to research on educational programs for BCSs. Inclusion criteria included: (1) focus on an educational program for post-treatment breast cancer survivors; (2) original research; (3) peer-review journals; (4) English language; and (5) published between January 2000 to May 2020. EndNote X9 (software version: X9, manufacturer: Clarivate, website location: endnote.com) was used as the reference management software package to manage citations from search results. A PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis) flowchart of the selection process is presented in this paper. Results : A total of 24 educational programs/interventions research studies include one mixed-method study, three qualitative studies, and twenty quantitative studies, were identified and analyzed. Three programs focused on BCSs’ self-management and self-efficacy, two programs focused on BCSs’ cognitive problems, seven programs focused on BCSs’ psychological distress, emotional support, and information seeking. In addition, one program focused on BCSs’ body image, body function, and sexual dysfunction issues, five programs focused on BCSs’ physical activities, nutritional levels, and normal body weight maintenance, two programs focused on BCSs’ supportive care and peer advocate support. Finally, one program focused on BCSs’ palliative care and end of life care, and three programs focused on BCSs’ post-treatment symptom clusters and overall quality of life. Conclusions : After breast cancer treatment ends, BCSs continue to suffer from long-term physical and psychological symptoms and report multiple unmet needs. Research on post-treatment breast cancer educational programs showed that programs assist BCSs with post-treatment symptom management and address their concerns while promoting supportive care and peer support to improve BCS’s overall quality of life. program. Study to explore experiences of waist of the end of of the in BMI and waist circumference a healthy
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
治疗后乳腺癌幸存者的教育项目:系统回顾
目的:本系统综述的目的是确定在过去二十年中与治疗后乳腺癌幸存者(BCSs)教育计划相关的科学证据的状态。方法:系统检索2000年1月至2020年5月的PubMed/MEDLINE、CINAHL、EMBASE、Web of Science和PsycINFO数据库,包括与bcs教育项目研究相关的关键词。入选标准包括:(1)关注乳腺癌治疗后幸存者的教育项目;(2)原创性研究;(3)同行评议期刊;(4)英语语言;(5)发表于2000年1月至2020年5月之间。采用EndNote X9(软件版本:X9,制造商:Clarivate,网站位置:endnote.com)作为参考文献管理软件包,对检索结果中的引文进行管理。本文介绍了选择过程的PRISMA(系统评价和元分析的首选报告项目)流程图。结果:共识别和分析了24项教育计划/干预研究,其中包括一项混合方法研究,三项定性研究和20项定量研究。3个项目聚焦于bcs的自我管理和自我效能,2个项目聚焦于bcs的认知问题,7个项目聚焦于bcs的心理困扰、情感支持和信息寻求。此外,有一个项目侧重于bcs的身体形象、身体功能和性功能障碍问题,五个项目侧重于bcs的身体活动、营养水平和正常体重维持,两个项目侧重于bcs的支持性护理和同伴倡导支持。最后,一个项目侧重于bcs的姑息治疗和临终关怀,三个项目侧重于bcs的治疗后症状群和整体生活质量。结论:乳腺癌治疗结束后,bcs继续遭受长期的生理和心理症状,并报告多种未满足的需求。对乳腺癌治疗后教育项目的研究表明,该项目帮助BCS进行治疗后症状管理,解决他们的担忧,同时促进支持性护理和同伴支持,以提高BCS的整体生活质量。程序。本研究旨在探讨经验腰围在BMI和健康腰围之间的关系
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
25.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: EJGO is dedicated to publishing editorial articles in the Distinguished Expert Series and original research papers, case reports, letters to the Editor, book reviews, and newsletters. The Journal was founded in 1980 the second gynaecologic oncology hyperspecialization Journal in the world. Its aim is the diffusion of scientific, clinical and practical progress, and knowledge in female neoplastic diseases in an interdisciplinary approach among gynaecologists, oncologists, radiotherapists, surgeons, chemotherapists, pathologists, epidemiologists, and so on.
期刊最新文献
Timing and duration of bevacizumab treatment and survival in patients with recurrent ovarian, fallopian tube, and peritoneal cancer: a multi-institution study. Vulvar cancer in young woman—case report Identification of an immune-related metabolic gene signature to predict possible prognosis in endometrial cancer and reveals immune landscape feature Evaluation of colposcopy and LEEP results performed in gynecology and gynecological oncology surgery services The infrequent large pelvi-perineal tumors as a surgical dilemma: en bloc resection and long-term results
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1