Entwicklungen und Perspektiven des Migrationsrechts zwischen Umbruch und Kontinuität

Q4 Social Sciences Verwaltung Pub Date : 2018-10-01 DOI:10.3790/VERW.51.4.495
C. Janda
{"title":"Entwicklungen und Perspektiven des Migrationsrechts zwischen Umbruch und Kontinuität","authors":"C. Janda","doi":"10.3790/VERW.51.4.495","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Providing a comprehensive review of the recent developments in migration and refugee law proves to be an impossible undertaking – one reason being the vast diversity of this area of law, which includes asylum, work or family migration, the other being the mix of actors in the multi-level system. The events of 2015, which are more likely to be referred to as “refugee protection crises” rather than a “refugee crisis”, undoubtedly mark a turning point. They have not only revealed the shortcomings of the Common EU Asylum System, but have triggered a broad societal debate on immigration as such. The focus of the following report will be on refugee law. First, the supra-national aspects of this increasingly Europeanized area of law shall be determined. Furthermore, the recent and various changes in national law shall be analyzed, ranging from the acceleration of asylum procedures, the efforts to limit and control migration up to the establishment of socio-economic incentive structures in order to avoid “bogus” asylum procedures. Finally, the article provides an overview of the perspectives of European and national migration and refugee law.","PeriodicalId":36848,"journal":{"name":"Verwaltung","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Verwaltung","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/VERW.51.4.495","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Providing a comprehensive review of the recent developments in migration and refugee law proves to be an impossible undertaking – one reason being the vast diversity of this area of law, which includes asylum, work or family migration, the other being the mix of actors in the multi-level system. The events of 2015, which are more likely to be referred to as “refugee protection crises” rather than a “refugee crisis”, undoubtedly mark a turning point. They have not only revealed the shortcomings of the Common EU Asylum System, but have triggered a broad societal debate on immigration as such. The focus of the following report will be on refugee law. First, the supra-national aspects of this increasingly Europeanized area of law shall be determined. Furthermore, the recent and various changes in national law shall be analyzed, ranging from the acceleration of asylum procedures, the efforts to limit and control migration up to the establishment of socio-economic incentive structures in order to avoid “bogus” asylum procedures. Finally, the article provides an overview of the perspectives of European and national migration and refugee law.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在动乱和持续移徙权利之间的发展和观点
对移民和难民法的最新发展进行全面审查被证明是一项不可能完成的任务-一个原因是这一法律领域的巨大多样性,其中包括庇护,工作或家庭移民,另一个原因是多层次系统中行为者的混合。2015年的事件,更有可能被称为“难民保护危机”,而不是“难民危机”,无疑标志着一个转折点。它们不仅暴露了欧盟共同庇护制度(Common EU Asylum System)的缺陷,还引发了一场关于移民本身的广泛社会辩论。下一份报告的重点将是难民法。首先,应确定这个日益欧洲化的法律领域的超国家方面。此外,还应分析最近国家法律的各种变化,从加速庇护程序、努力限制和控制移徙到建立社会经济奖励结构以避免“虚假”庇护程序。最后,文章概述了欧洲和各国移民和难民法的观点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Verwaltung
Verwaltung Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
期刊最新文献
Fluggastdatenspeicherung: Die Zukunft von Vorratsdatenspeicherung und automatisierter Verdachtsgenerierung Das Politische der Gemeinnützigkeit: Das Vereinsrecht zwischen Steuerrecht, Gefahrenabwehr und Antidiskriminierung Die Bedeutung von Handbüchern für die Entwicklung des Öffentlichen Rechts Augmented Reality im öffentlichen Raum Das Standardsetzungsmodell des IT-Sicherheitsrechts im Kontext kritischer Infrastrukturen
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1