Exchange blood transfusion for hyperbilirubinaemia: Neonatal characteristics and short-term outcomes

MMed Paed K Seake, S. Velaphi, PhD MB ChB
{"title":"Exchange blood transfusion for hyperbilirubinaemia: Neonatal characteristics and short-term outcomes","authors":"MMed Paed K Seake, S. Velaphi, PhD MB ChB","doi":"10.7196/sajch.2022.v16i4.1794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. Factors that have been associated with severe hyperbilirubinaemia requiring exchange blood transfusion (EBT) are early discharge, late preterm birth and haemolytic disease. Early discharge is a common practice in neonatal care, so it is important to identify and audit neonates who received EBT, in order to identify modifiable factors.  \nObjectives. To describe the characteristics and outcomes of infants requiring EBT.  \nMethods. We reviewed records of infants admitted with severe jaundice requiring EBT from January 2009 to December 2013. Descriptive analysis of characteristics, clinical presentation, laboratory findings and outcome at discharge was performed.  \nResults. A total of 150 neonates received EBT (30 per year), and 101 were reviewed. Of these, 34 (33.7%) were inpatients and 67 (66.3%) were new admissions (2.34/1 000 new admissions). The majority of neonates requiring EBT were born vaginally (86.1%), were late preterm births (20.8%) and were exclusively breastfed (82.2%). The median postnatal age at presentation was 5 days. Clinical signs suggestive of acute bilirubin encephalopathy were present in 24.8% of cases. Among mother-infant pairs with known blood groups, 9.3% and 70.4% had rhesus (Rh) and ABO incompatibility, respectively. A Coombs test was positive in 62.5% of those with Rh incompatibility compared with 31.7% of those with ABO incompatibility. A total of 6 patients (5.9%) died, all within 7 days of EBT, but none during EBT.  \nConclusion. The majority of neonates requiring EBT presented post discharge after birth and had been born vaginally at term, suggesting early discharge after delivery. More than two-thirds of cases were related to ABO incompatibility. Screening for jaundice before discharge must be prioritised, especially for infants born to mothers who are Rh negative or ABO blood group O. ","PeriodicalId":44732,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Child Health","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Child Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7196/sajch.2022.v16i4.1794","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background. Factors that have been associated with severe hyperbilirubinaemia requiring exchange blood transfusion (EBT) are early discharge, late preterm birth and haemolytic disease. Early discharge is a common practice in neonatal care, so it is important to identify and audit neonates who received EBT, in order to identify modifiable factors.  Objectives. To describe the characteristics and outcomes of infants requiring EBT.  Methods. We reviewed records of infants admitted with severe jaundice requiring EBT from January 2009 to December 2013. Descriptive analysis of characteristics, clinical presentation, laboratory findings and outcome at discharge was performed.  Results. A total of 150 neonates received EBT (30 per year), and 101 were reviewed. Of these, 34 (33.7%) were inpatients and 67 (66.3%) were new admissions (2.34/1 000 new admissions). The majority of neonates requiring EBT were born vaginally (86.1%), were late preterm births (20.8%) and were exclusively breastfed (82.2%). The median postnatal age at presentation was 5 days. Clinical signs suggestive of acute bilirubin encephalopathy were present in 24.8% of cases. Among mother-infant pairs with known blood groups, 9.3% and 70.4% had rhesus (Rh) and ABO incompatibility, respectively. A Coombs test was positive in 62.5% of those with Rh incompatibility compared with 31.7% of those with ABO incompatibility. A total of 6 patients (5.9%) died, all within 7 days of EBT, but none during EBT.  Conclusion. The majority of neonates requiring EBT presented post discharge after birth and had been born vaginally at term, suggesting early discharge after delivery. More than two-thirds of cases were related to ABO incompatibility. Screening for jaundice before discharge must be prioritised, especially for infants born to mothers who are Rh negative or ABO blood group O. 
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
换血治疗高胆红素血症:新生儿特点和短期疗效
背景与需要换血(EBT)的严重高胆红素血症相关的因素包括早期出院、晚期早产和溶血性疾病。早期出院是新生儿护理中的一种常见做法,因此识别和审计接受EBT的新生儿,以确定可改变的因素是很重要的。目标。描述需要EBT的婴儿的特征和结果。方法。我们回顾了2009年1月至2013年12月因严重黄疸需要EBT入院的婴儿的记录。对特征、临床表现、实验室检查结果和出院时的结果进行描述性分析。结果。共有150名新生儿接受EBT(每年30名),101名新生儿接受了回顾性检查。其中,34人(33.7%)为住院患者,67人(66.3%)为新入院患者(2.34/1000名新入院患者)。大多数需要EBT的新生儿是经阴道出生的(86.1%)、晚期早产的(20.8%)和纯母乳喂养的(82.2%)。出生后的中位年龄为5天。24.8%的病例出现提示急性胆红素脑病的临床症状。在已知血型的母婴对中,分别有9.3%和70.4%的人患有恒河猴(Rh)和ABO血型不合。在Rh不相容的人群中,62.5%的人的Coombs检测呈阳性,而在ABO不相容人群中,这一比例为31.7%。共有6名患者(5.9%)在EBT后7天内死亡,但没有一名患者在EBT期间死亡。结论。大多数需要EBT的新生儿在出生后出现在出院后,并且在足月时通过阴道出生,这表明分娩后提前出院。超过三分之二的病例与ABO血型不合有关。出院前必须优先进行黄疸筛查,尤其是对于Rh阴性或ABO血型O的母亲所生的婴儿。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Hepatocardiopulmonary hydatid cysts: A rare paediatric case Exploring adolescent fertility inequality in Southern Africa Hyperglycaemia and outcome in neonates with hypoxic-ischaemic encephalopathy An audit of infants presenting with cholestatic jaundice at a secondary hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa A description of the management and outcomes of infants with short bowel syndrome in a South African context
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1