Validity and reliability: the Iranian version of Lawton IADL in elderly community dwellers

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2020-08-03 DOI:10.1108/jpmh-05-2020-0036
F. Mirzadeh, M. Alizadeh-Khoei, F. Sharifi, Reyhaneh Aminaloroaya, S. Hormozi, H. Fakhrzadeh
{"title":"Validity and reliability: the Iranian version of Lawton IADL in elderly community dwellers","authors":"F. Mirzadeh, M. Alizadeh-Khoei, F. Sharifi, Reyhaneh Aminaloroaya, S. Hormozi, H. Fakhrzadeh","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-05-2020-0036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Normal aging changes, acute and chronic illness, and the long stay in the hospital made the decline in elderly physical and mental abilities in non-instrumental and Instrumental Activities Daily Livings (IADL). This paper aims to determine the validity and reliability of Lawton IADL in the Iranian elderly community relevancy to physical, mental and cognitive measurements.,A cross-sectional study with 422 participants, age 60 years old and over selected by face-to-face interviewing from the geriatric clinic, Tehran medical university from January to June 2019.,Of 422 participants referring to outpatient clinics the majority were male (62.8%); with an average of 66.9 ± 5.95 years old. Reliability was significantly high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96, p < 0.001). There was a significant relationship between IADL with Short-Form Health Survey36-Mental Component Score (SF36-MCS), with p < 0.01. Reliability was significantly high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96, p < 0.001). In the factor analysis with eigenvalues more than one, two components were found; that the first factor named as observational daily activities, whereas the second factor named “advanced daily activities”.,The limitation of this study was the low number of similar studies to compare the results and the stronger discussion.,Determining IADL's dependency in the community elderly is important to maintain their self-care manages. More studies are needed to manifest the relationship between mental health and IADL's independence. Therefore, validation in different settings is important in planning for the geriatrics team.","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"241-250"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jpmh-05-2020-0036","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-05-2020-0036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Normal aging changes, acute and chronic illness, and the long stay in the hospital made the decline in elderly physical and mental abilities in non-instrumental and Instrumental Activities Daily Livings (IADL). This paper aims to determine the validity and reliability of Lawton IADL in the Iranian elderly community relevancy to physical, mental and cognitive measurements.,A cross-sectional study with 422 participants, age 60 years old and over selected by face-to-face interviewing from the geriatric clinic, Tehran medical university from January to June 2019.,Of 422 participants referring to outpatient clinics the majority were male (62.8%); with an average of 66.9 ± 5.95 years old. Reliability was significantly high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96, p < 0.001). There was a significant relationship between IADL with Short-Form Health Survey36-Mental Component Score (SF36-MCS), with p < 0.01. Reliability was significantly high (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.96, p < 0.001). In the factor analysis with eigenvalues more than one, two components were found; that the first factor named as observational daily activities, whereas the second factor named “advanced daily activities”.,The limitation of this study was the low number of similar studies to compare the results and the stronger discussion.,Determining IADL's dependency in the community elderly is important to maintain their self-care manages. More studies are needed to manifest the relationship between mental health and IADL's independence. Therefore, validation in different settings is important in planning for the geriatrics team.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
效度与信度:伊朗版劳顿IADL在老年社区居民中的应用
正常的衰老变化、急慢性疾病和长期住院使老年人在非工具性和工具性日常生活中的身心能力下降。本文旨在确定伊朗老年社区Lawton IADL与身体、心理和认知测量的相关性的有效性和可靠性。,2019年1月至6月,德黑兰医科大学老年诊所通过面对面访谈选择了422名60岁及以上的参与者,进行了一项横断面研究。在422名门诊参与者中,大多数是男性(62.8%);平均年龄66.9±5.95岁。信度显著较高(Cronbachα=0.96,p<0.001)。IADL与短期健康调查36心理成分评分(SF36-MCS)之间存在显著关系,p<0.01。可靠性显著较高(Cronbachα=0.96,p<0.001)。在特征值超过一个的因子分析中,发现两个分量;第一个因素被命名为观察性日常活动,而第二个因素被称为“高级日常活动”。,这项研究的局限性在于,比较结果的类似研究数量较少,讨论力度较大。,确定社区老年人IADL的依赖性对于维持他们的自我护理管理很重要。需要更多的研究来阐明心理健康与IADL独立性之间的关系。因此,在老年医学团队的规划中,在不同环境中进行验证是很重要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Overcoming challenges of embedding child and youth mental health research in community NHS services Psychological wellbeing and avoidance strategies as moderators between excessive social media use and academic performance among Indian college students Pain and associated functional impairment in the Danish general population: the role of mental well-being Impact of nature on the mental health and well-being of the ICU survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Public mental health and wellbeing interventions delivered by allied health professionals (AHPs): mapping the evidence and identification of gaps. A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1