ZWYCIĘSKIE PREFERENCJE. SKUTECZNOŚĆ GŁOSÓW PREFERENCYJNYCH W SYSTEMIE PROPORCJONALNYM Z LISTAMI OTWARTYMI

Q3 Social Sciences Decyzje Pub Date : 2018-06-15 DOI:10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.101
Adam Gendźwiłł, J. Flis, Dariusz Stolicki
{"title":"ZWYCIĘSKIE PREFERENCJE. SKUTECZNOŚĆ GŁOSÓW PREFERENCYJNYCH W SYSTEMIE PROPORCJONALNYM Z LISTAMI OTWARTYMI","authors":"Adam Gendźwiłł, J. Flis, Dariusz Stolicki","doi":"10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article presents the usage of the preference votes in open-list proportional representation system (OLPR). The electoral rules condition the effi ciency of the casted votes, i.e. the extent to which the voters’ preferences affect the distribution of seats. In the OLPR system the “wasted votes” may refer not only to the representation of party preferences, but also personal preferences frequently expressing distinct territorial identities. Using the data from Polish Sejm elections, as well as the subnational elections, the authors analyze the usage and outcomes of the preference votes. During the last two decades in Sejm elections the share of effi cient preference votes (casted for the elected representatives) was only slightly higher than the share of votes casted for the losing candidates; in case of the subnational elections, the latter category of votes visibly prevailed. The authors analyze in detail the differences between the elections, parties and Sejm electoral districts, representing various characteristics. Non-parametrical regression analysis provides the list of factors infl uencing the effi ciency of preferential votes, which is generally in agreement with the theoretical expectations. The largest shares of effi cient preference votes may be observed in the districts of a high magnitude, and a lower level of fragmentation (both party and territorial).","PeriodicalId":37255,"journal":{"name":"Decyzje","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Decyzje","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7206/DEC.1733-0092.101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The article presents the usage of the preference votes in open-list proportional representation system (OLPR). The electoral rules condition the effi ciency of the casted votes, i.e. the extent to which the voters’ preferences affect the distribution of seats. In the OLPR system the “wasted votes” may refer not only to the representation of party preferences, but also personal preferences frequently expressing distinct territorial identities. Using the data from Polish Sejm elections, as well as the subnational elections, the authors analyze the usage and outcomes of the preference votes. During the last two decades in Sejm elections the share of effi cient preference votes (casted for the elected representatives) was only slightly higher than the share of votes casted for the losing candidates; in case of the subnational elections, the latter category of votes visibly prevailed. The authors analyze in detail the differences between the elections, parties and Sejm electoral districts, representing various characteristics. Non-parametrical regression analysis provides the list of factors infl uencing the effi ciency of preferential votes, which is generally in agreement with the theoretical expectations. The largest shares of effi cient preference votes may be observed in the districts of a high magnitude, and a lower level of fragmentation (both party and territorial).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
获胜偏好。开放名单比例系统中优先投票的有效性
本文介绍了优先投票在公开名单比例代表制中的应用。选举规则决定了投票的效率,即选民的偏好对席位分配的影响程度。在OLPR系统中,“浪费选票”可能不仅指政党偏好的代表,还指经常表达不同领土身份的个人偏好。作者利用波兰议会选举和地方选举的数据,分析了优先投票的使用和结果。在过去二十年的众议院选举中,有效的优先选票(投给当选代表)所占份额仅略高于投给落选候选人的选票份额;在国家以下各级选举中,后一类选票明显占上风。作者详细分析了选举、政党和瑟姆选区之间的差异,代表了各种特征。非参数回归分析提供了影响优先投票效率的因素列表,这与理论预期基本一致。在规模较大、分裂程度较低的地区(包括政党和地区),可以观察到有效优先投票的比例最大。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Decyzje
Decyzje Social Sciences-Law
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Maurice Allais o podejmowaniu decyzji W te gry więźniowie nie grają. Instytucje rzeczywistej subkultury więziennej łagodzące konflikt i przemoc w kontraście do eksperymentu Zimbardo Gary S. Becker i Kevin M. Murphy – „Ekonomia społeczna. Co wpływa na zachowania jednostki” Show issue Year 6/2021  Issue 35 Sensitivity of numerate individuals to large asymmetry in outcomes: A registered replication of Traczyk et al. (2018) Primacy Effects in Poland – supplement to Steven Linder
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1