Gender differences in marital satisfaction across cultural contexts: does ‘knowing one’s spouse’s friends’ matter?

IF 1.4 4区 社会学 Q3 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Family Studies Pub Date : 2022-11-12 DOI:10.1080/13229400.2022.2144415
Hsin-Chieh Chang, Yang-chih Fu
{"title":"Gender differences in marital satisfaction across cultural contexts: does ‘knowing one’s spouse’s friends’ matter?","authors":"Hsin-Chieh Chang, Yang-chih Fu","doi":"10.1080/13229400.2022.2144415","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT More than three decades after Jessie Bernard’s argument on marriage is good for men, but not for women, the post-millennium marriage and family literature has largely shown that men’s reported marital satisfaction is higher than women’s across socio-cultural contexts. This study examines gender differences in marital satisfaction from a social network perspective, investigating the role of ‘known friendship network’ using cross-sectional, large-N samples in mainland China, Taiwan, and the United States. The ‘known friendship network’ concept captures the cognitive component of an individual’s perception of their knowledge of the spouse’s ‘interactive networks’ [Milardo, R. M. (1989). Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of the social networks of spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/352377. We found that knowing more of one’s spouse’s friends enhances marital satisfaction in an incremental fashion, especially in Taiwan and the United States. The lower importance in China may reflect China’s predominantly kinship-based social networks. Regarding how ‘known friendship network’ patterns explain marital satisfaction, the United States has the least pronounced gender differences, while the gender gap is most significant in Taiwan. This study contributes to the cross-cultural literature on relationship satisfaction, social networks, and global family change. Our findings have complex implications for marital selectivity and the gendered connotations of marriage, suggesting a marital expectations mismatch among heterosexual couples in some low fertility contexts.","PeriodicalId":46462,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Family Studies","volume":"29 1","pages":"2153 - 2172"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Family Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13229400.2022.2144415","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT More than three decades after Jessie Bernard’s argument on marriage is good for men, but not for women, the post-millennium marriage and family literature has largely shown that men’s reported marital satisfaction is higher than women’s across socio-cultural contexts. This study examines gender differences in marital satisfaction from a social network perspective, investigating the role of ‘known friendship network’ using cross-sectional, large-N samples in mainland China, Taiwan, and the United States. The ‘known friendship network’ concept captures the cognitive component of an individual’s perception of their knowledge of the spouse’s ‘interactive networks’ [Milardo, R. M. (1989). Theoretical and methodological issues in the identification of the social networks of spouses. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 51(1), 165–174. https://doi.org/10.2307/352377. We found that knowing more of one’s spouse’s friends enhances marital satisfaction in an incremental fashion, especially in Taiwan and the United States. The lower importance in China may reflect China’s predominantly kinship-based social networks. Regarding how ‘known friendship network’ patterns explain marital satisfaction, the United States has the least pronounced gender differences, while the gender gap is most significant in Taiwan. This study contributes to the cross-cultural literature on relationship satisfaction, social networks, and global family change. Our findings have complex implications for marital selectivity and the gendered connotations of marriage, suggesting a marital expectations mismatch among heterosexual couples in some low fertility contexts.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
不同文化背景下婚姻满意度的性别差异:“了解配偶的朋友”重要吗?
杰西·伯纳德(Jessie Bernard)提出婚姻对男性有利,但对女性不利的观点30多年后,千禧年后的婚姻和家庭文献在很大程度上表明,在不同的社会文化背景下,男性对婚姻的满意度高于女性。本研究从社会网络的角度考察了婚姻满意度的性别差异,在中国大陆、台湾和美国使用横断面、大n样本调查了“已知友谊网络”的作用。“已知的友谊网络”概念捕捉了个人对其配偶“互动网络”知识的认知成分[Milardo, R. M.(1989)]。配偶社会网络识别的理论和方法问题。婚姻与家庭,51(1),165-174。https://doi.org/10.2307/352377。我们发现,了解配偶的朋友越多,婚姻满意度就越高,尤其是在台湾和美国。在中国,重要性较低可能反映了中国主要以亲属为基础的社交网络。在“已知友谊网络”模式如何解释婚姻满意度方面,美国的性别差异最小,而台湾的性别差异最大。本研究对关系满意度、社会网络和全球家庭变化的跨文化文献有所贡献。我们的研究结果对婚姻选择和婚姻的性别内涵有着复杂的影响,表明在一些低生育率背景下,异性恋夫妇的婚姻期望不匹配。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Family Studies
Journal of Family Studies FAMILY STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
12.50%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: The Journal of Family Studies is a peer reviewed international journal under the Editorship of Adjunct Professor Lawrie Moloney, School of Public Health, LaTrobe University; Australian Institute of Family Studies; and co-director of Children in Focus. The focus of the Journal of Family Studies is on the wellbeing of children in families in the process of change.
期刊最新文献
Cisgender men’s narratives about their desires to be pregnant: re/constructing reproduction, gender, and their entanglement Good normative parenting: towards a non-teleological and relational ideal African single mothers and their children in Canada: transnational experiences and sources of support Composition of Ukrainian households under forced migration and its impact on livelihood opportunities at early stage of stay in Krakow Introduction to a special issue in memoriam Michael Rush: the politics of fatherhood around the world
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1