Evaluation of effectiveness of supervised classification algorithms in land cover classification using ASTER images-A case study from the Mankweng (Turfloop) Area and its environs, Limpopo Province, South Africa

IF 0.3 Q4 REMOTE SENSING South African Journal of Geomatics Pub Date : 2020-02-27 DOI:10.4314/sajg.v9i1.5
Nndanduleni Muavhi
{"title":"Evaluation of effectiveness of supervised classification algorithms in land cover classification using ASTER images-A case study from the Mankweng (Turfloop) Area and its environs, Limpopo Province, South Africa","authors":"Nndanduleni Muavhi","doi":"10.4314/sajg.v9i1.5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The production of land cover maps using supervised classification algorithms is one of the most common applications of remote sensing. In this study, the effectiveness of supervised classification algorithms in land cover classification using ASTER data was evaluated in the Mankweng Area and its environs. The false colour composite image generated from combination of band 1, 2 and 3 in red, green and blue, respectively, was used to generate training classes for six land cover types (waterbody, forest, vegetation, Duiwelskloof leucogranite, Turfloop granite and built-up land). These were used to construct land cover maps using eight supervised classification algorithms: Maximum Likelihood, Minimum Distance, Support Vector Machine, Mahalanobis Distance, Parallelepiped, Neural Network, Spectral Angle Mapper and Spectral Information Divergence. To evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms, the land cover maps were subjected to accuracy assessment to determine precision of the algorithms in accurately classifying the land cover types and level of confidence that can be attributed to the land cover maps. Most algorithms poorly performed in classifying spatially overlapping land cover types without abrupt boundaries. This indicates that the environmental conditions and distribution of land cover types can affect the performance of certain classification algorithms, and thus need to be considered prior to selection of algorithms. However, Support Vector Machine and Minimum Distance proved to be the two most effective algorithms as they provided better producer’s and user’s accuracy in the range of 80-100% for all land cover types, which represent good classification.","PeriodicalId":43854,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal of Geomatics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-02-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal of Geomatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4314/sajg.v9i1.5","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REMOTE SENSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

Abstract

The production of land cover maps using supervised classification algorithms is one of the most common applications of remote sensing. In this study, the effectiveness of supervised classification algorithms in land cover classification using ASTER data was evaluated in the Mankweng Area and its environs. The false colour composite image generated from combination of band 1, 2 and 3 in red, green and blue, respectively, was used to generate training classes for six land cover types (waterbody, forest, vegetation, Duiwelskloof leucogranite, Turfloop granite and built-up land). These were used to construct land cover maps using eight supervised classification algorithms: Maximum Likelihood, Minimum Distance, Support Vector Machine, Mahalanobis Distance, Parallelepiped, Neural Network, Spectral Angle Mapper and Spectral Information Divergence. To evaluate the effectiveness of the algorithms, the land cover maps were subjected to accuracy assessment to determine precision of the algorithms in accurately classifying the land cover types and level of confidence that can be attributed to the land cover maps. Most algorithms poorly performed in classifying spatially overlapping land cover types without abrupt boundaries. This indicates that the environmental conditions and distribution of land cover types can affect the performance of certain classification algorithms, and thus need to be considered prior to selection of algorithms. However, Support Vector Machine and Minimum Distance proved to be the two most effective algorithms as they provided better producer’s and user’s accuracy in the range of 80-100% for all land cover types, which represent good classification.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用ASTER图像评估监督分类算法在土地覆盖分类中的有效性——以南非林波波省Mankweng(Turfloop)地区及其周边地区为例
使用监督分类算法制作土地覆盖图是遥感最常见的应用之一。在本研究中,利用ASTER数据对Mankweng地区及其周边地区的土地覆盖分类进行了监督分类算法的有效性评估。分别由红、绿和蓝波段1、2和3组合生成的伪彩色合成图像用于生成六种土地覆盖类型(水体、森林、植被、Duiwelskloof浅色花岗岩、Turfloop花岗岩和建成区)的训练类。这些被用于使用八种监督分类算法构建土地覆盖图:最大似然、最小距离、支持向量机、马氏距离、平行六面体、神经网络、光谱角映射器和光谱信息发散。为了评估算法的有效性,对土地覆盖图进行了精度评估,以确定算法在准确分类土地覆盖类型方面的精度以及可归因于土地覆盖图的置信水平。大多数算法在没有突然边界的情况下对空间重叠的土地覆盖类型进行分类时表现不佳。这表明,环境条件和土地覆盖类型的分布会影响某些分类算法的性能,因此在选择算法之前需要加以考虑。然而,支持向量机和最小距离被证明是两种最有效的算法,因为它们在所有土地覆盖类型的80-100%范围内提供了更好的生产者和用户的准确度,这代表了良好的分类。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
82
期刊最新文献
Classification of 3D Sonar Point Clouds derived Underwater using Machine and Deep Learning (CANUPO and RandLA-Net) Approaches Characterising the evolution of the urban form of zones that accommodate warehousing clusters in the City of Cape Town municipality Error Analysis in Multibeam Hydrographic Survey System Temporal Characterization of Land Use Change and Land-scape Processes in Informal Settlements in the City of Cape Town, South Africa Analysis of thermally-induced displacements of the HartRAO Lunar Laser Ranger optical tube: impact on pointing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1