Local Government Borrowing’s Expansionary Monetary Effect and Its Policy Synergy

Na Li, Rongmao Liu
{"title":"Local Government Borrowing’s Expansionary Monetary Effect and Its Policy Synergy","authors":"Na Li, Rongmao Liu","doi":"10.1515/cfer-2022-0016","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract All governments face increasingly frequent issues arising from aggregate supply and demand against currency circulation and financial stability, and public finance and banking authorities employ a variety of policy instruments to keep the economy stable and coordinated. How to avoid policy conflicts and maximize effectiveness in policy portfolio of local government borrowing, which is taken as a major macro-control instrument, is a subject that needs in-depth study. This paper probes into local government borrowing’s monetary effect and transmission mechanism and its best synergistic model with monetary policy by the construction of a NK-DSGE model covering financial frictions, multi-period bonds and borrowing rules. The findings are as follows. (1) The shocks of one-percent local government borrowing (bond duration=5 years) push up the money multiplier by 0.39% to produce expansionary monetary effect, and the longer the bond duration, the greater the effect. (2) In the context of physical and financial shocks, monetary policy adopts a moderately tight reverse synergy with local government borrowing, effectively restraining its expansionary monetary effect for better economic stability and recovery. (3) For bonds with longer maturities, raising the risk sensitivity of local government borrowing rules benefits the improvement of welfare.","PeriodicalId":66259,"journal":{"name":"China Finance and Economic Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"46 - 65"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"China Finance and Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2022-0016","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract All governments face increasingly frequent issues arising from aggregate supply and demand against currency circulation and financial stability, and public finance and banking authorities employ a variety of policy instruments to keep the economy stable and coordinated. How to avoid policy conflicts and maximize effectiveness in policy portfolio of local government borrowing, which is taken as a major macro-control instrument, is a subject that needs in-depth study. This paper probes into local government borrowing’s monetary effect and transmission mechanism and its best synergistic model with monetary policy by the construction of a NK-DSGE model covering financial frictions, multi-period bonds and borrowing rules. The findings are as follows. (1) The shocks of one-percent local government borrowing (bond duration=5 years) push up the money multiplier by 0.39% to produce expansionary monetary effect, and the longer the bond duration, the greater the effect. (2) In the context of physical and financial shocks, monetary policy adopts a moderately tight reverse synergy with local government borrowing, effectively restraining its expansionary monetary effect for better economic stability and recovery. (3) For bonds with longer maturities, raising the risk sensitivity of local government borrowing rules benefits the improvement of welfare.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
地方政府借贷的扩张性货币效应及其政策协同效应
摘要各国政府都面临着日益频繁的货币流通和金融稳定的总供求问题,公共财政和银行当局采取了各种政策手段来保持经济的稳定和协调。地方政府借贷作为宏观调控的主要工具,如何避免政策冲突,最大限度地发挥其政策组合的有效性,是一个需要深入研究的课题。本文通过构建一个涵盖金融摩擦、多期债券和借贷规则的NK-DSGE模型,探讨了地方政府借贷的货币效应和传导机制及其与货币政策的最佳协同模型。研究结果如下。(1) 1%的地方政府借贷(债券期限=5年)的冲击将货币乘数推高0.39%,产生扩张性货币效应,债券期限越长,效应越大。(2) 在物理和金融冲击的背景下,货币政策与地方政府借贷采取适度紧缩的反向协同作用,有效抑制了其扩张性货币效应,促进了经济的稳定和复苏。(3) 对于期限较长的债券,提高地方政府借贷规则的风险敏感性有利于福利的改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
88
期刊最新文献
The Effect of “Pressure-Type” Fiscal Incentives on Industrial Restructuring in China A Study of Coordinating China’s Two-Pillar Regulatory Policy under the Shock of the Fed’s Interest Rate Hike—From the Perspective of “Stable Growth” and “Risk Prevention” The “Stagflation” Risk and Policy Control: Causes, Governance and Inspirations Robot Application and Adjustment of Export Product Scope: Can We Have Both Efficiency and Quality? Convergence Analysis of Village Collective Economy Based on a Long-Term (1978–2018) Observation of 40 Villages in the Suburbs of Beijing
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1