Fuel scarcity or household wealth? Assessing the drivers of cooking energy consumption patterns in rural areas in East Africa

IF 1.1 Q4 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Pub Date : 2022-11-30 DOI:10.1080/14728028.2022.2153282
C. Matavel, H. Hoffmann, J. Hafner, H. Kipkulei, G. Uckert, J. Kaingo, J. Salavessa, Hadijah Mbwana, Ramula Issa, Leonel Silva Novela, S. Sieber, C. Rybak
{"title":"Fuel scarcity or household wealth? Assessing the drivers of cooking energy consumption patterns in rural areas in East Africa","authors":"C. Matavel, H. Hoffmann, J. Hafner, H. Kipkulei, G. Uckert, J. Kaingo, J. Salavessa, Hadijah Mbwana, Ramula Issa, Leonel Silva Novela, S. Sieber, C. Rybak","doi":"10.1080/14728028.2022.2153282","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Rural households in Tanzania and Mozambique depend mainly on charcoal, firewood and other traditional fuels, such as cow dung or agriculture by-products, to cook. Simultaneously, fuel scarcity is an important phenomenon that leads households to apply coping strategies such as reducing the number of meals or increasing walking distance to collect firewood. Despite the well-known negative health, economic and potential ecologic impacts, the transition away from solid biomass energy sources is not expected in the short run. Thus, understanding the patterns of biomass energy consumption is essential to allow sustainable development in the household cooking sector. In this study, we evaluated the influence of wealth status and fuelwood scarcity on household energy choices in four villages with case study sites in Mozambique and Tanzania. The fuel usage patterns are consistent with the ‘energy stacking’ model as, despite an increase in the consumption of charcoal, firewood remains the principal cooking fuel. Wealth does not necessarily result in a transition toward cleaner fuels, nor does scarcity result in the use of other forms of traditional bioenergy. We suggest the promotion of fuel reduction strategies such as improved cookstoves or the implementation of on-farm trees to reduce the pressure on forests.","PeriodicalId":12422,"journal":{"name":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","volume":"32 1","pages":"12 - 25"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Forests, Trees and Livelihoods","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14728028.2022.2153282","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Rural households in Tanzania and Mozambique depend mainly on charcoal, firewood and other traditional fuels, such as cow dung or agriculture by-products, to cook. Simultaneously, fuel scarcity is an important phenomenon that leads households to apply coping strategies such as reducing the number of meals or increasing walking distance to collect firewood. Despite the well-known negative health, economic and potential ecologic impacts, the transition away from solid biomass energy sources is not expected in the short run. Thus, understanding the patterns of biomass energy consumption is essential to allow sustainable development in the household cooking sector. In this study, we evaluated the influence of wealth status and fuelwood scarcity on household energy choices in four villages with case study sites in Mozambique and Tanzania. The fuel usage patterns are consistent with the ‘energy stacking’ model as, despite an increase in the consumption of charcoal, firewood remains the principal cooking fuel. Wealth does not necessarily result in a transition toward cleaner fuels, nor does scarcity result in the use of other forms of traditional bioenergy. We suggest the promotion of fuel reduction strategies such as improved cookstoves or the implementation of on-farm trees to reduce the pressure on forests.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
燃料短缺还是家庭财富?评估东非农村地区烹饪能源消费模式的驱动因素
摘要坦桑尼亚和莫桑比克的农村家庭主要依靠木炭、木柴和其他传统燃料(如牛粪或农业副产品)做饭。与此同时,燃料短缺是一个重要现象,导致家庭采取应对策略,如减少用餐次数或增加拾柴的步行距离。尽管存在众所周知的负面健康、经济和潜在生态影响,但预计短期内不会从固体生物质能源转型。因此,了解生物质能源消费模式对于家庭烹饪行业的可持续发展至关重要。在这项研究中,我们评估了财富状况和薪材稀缺对莫桑比克和坦桑尼亚四个村庄家庭能源选择的影响。燃料使用模式与“能源堆叠”模式一致,因为尽管木炭的消耗量增加,但木柴仍然是主要的烹饪燃料。财富并不一定会导致向更清洁的燃料过渡,稀缺也不一定会导致使用其他形式的传统生物能源。我们建议推广减少燃料的战略,如改进炉灶或在农场种植树木,以减轻对森林的压力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods
Forests, Trees and Livelihoods Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Forestry
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
期刊介绍: Forests, Trees and Livelihoods originated in 1979 under the name of the International Tree Crops Journal and adopted its new name in 2001 in order to reflect its emphasis on the diversity of tree based systems within the field of rural development. It is a peer-reviewed international journal publishing comments, reviews, case studies, research methodologies and research findings and articles on policies in this general field in order to promote discussion, debate and the exchange of information and views in the main subject areas of.
期刊最新文献
Perception of agroforestry practices and factors influencing adoption among shifting cultivators in Tripura, India Livelihood benefits and challenges of Acacia decurrens -based agroforestry system in Awi Zone highlands, Northwest Ethiopia The role of learning sources in familiarity with conservation programs: the gendered case of family forest landowners in Georgia, United States Influence of a plant growth booster on the growth and quality parameters of Juniperus polycarpos seedlings under nursery conditions Ailanthus excelsa Roxb. in India: A multipurpose “tree of Heaven” for semi-arid regions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1