Strategies of legitimization in Mesoamerica

Q1 Arts and Humanities Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics Pub Date : 2021-01-01 DOI:10.1086/717940
J. Testard
{"title":"Strategies of legitimization in Mesoamerica","authors":"J. Testard","doi":"10.1086/717940","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Despite the abundant quantity of greenstone artifacts found in Teotihuacan, to the best of our knowledge, only one example of a figurative plaque has ever been recovered from the site. This plaque (British Museum, Am1938,1021.25) was recovered from an unknown and probably intrusive context within the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, deposited long after its construction (Digby 1972, 30; Nagao 2006, 420; Sugiyama and López Luján 2006, 145). By contrast, in CacaxtlaXochitécatl (Tlaxcala) and Xochicalco (Morelos), several Epiclassic figurative plaques have been found in archaeological contexts (fig. 1). How can we explain their appearance in the central Mexican highlands? What were their uses and functions? What can be said about them in terms of sociopolitical processes? The present study converges with Solar Valverde’s (2002) and Nagao’s (2006, 2014) previous works on greenstone figurative plaques but seeks to add examples and deepen considerations regarding seventeen figurative plaques from the Cacaxtla-Xochitécatl and Xochicalco archaeological sites: seven from CacaxtlaXochitécatl (A to G) and ten from Xochicalco (H to Q) (fig. 2). I will evaluate their contexts, uses, and","PeriodicalId":39613,"journal":{"name":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","volume":"75-76 1","pages":"118 - 136"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/717940","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Despite the abundant quantity of greenstone artifacts found in Teotihuacan, to the best of our knowledge, only one example of a figurative plaque has ever been recovered from the site. This plaque (British Museum, Am1938,1021.25) was recovered from an unknown and probably intrusive context within the Pyramid of the Feathered Serpent, deposited long after its construction (Digby 1972, 30; Nagao 2006, 420; Sugiyama and López Luján 2006, 145). By contrast, in CacaxtlaXochitécatl (Tlaxcala) and Xochicalco (Morelos), several Epiclassic figurative plaques have been found in archaeological contexts (fig. 1). How can we explain their appearance in the central Mexican highlands? What were their uses and functions? What can be said about them in terms of sociopolitical processes? The present study converges with Solar Valverde’s (2002) and Nagao’s (2006, 2014) previous works on greenstone figurative plaques but seeks to add examples and deepen considerations regarding seventeen figurative plaques from the Cacaxtla-Xochitécatl and Xochicalco archaeological sites: seven from CacaxtlaXochitécatl (A to G) and ten from Xochicalco (H to Q) (fig. 2). I will evaluate their contexts, uses, and
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中美洲的合法化战略
尽管在特奥蒂瓦坎发现了大量的绿岩文物,但据我们所知,该遗址只发现了一块具象牌匾。这块牌匾(大英博物馆,Am19381021.25)是从羽蛇金字塔中一个未知的、可能是侵入性的环境中发现的,在其建造后很长一段时间就被沉积了(Digby 1972,30;Nagao 2006,420;Sugiyama和López Luján 2006,145)。相比之下,在CacaxtlaXochitécatl(Tlaxcala)和Xochicalco(Morelos)中,在考古背景下发现了几块新古典主义具象牌匾(图1)。我们如何解释它们在墨西哥中部高地的出现?它们的用途和功能是什么?从社会政治进程的角度来看,可以对他们说些什么?本研究与Solar Valverde(2002)和Nagao(20062014)之前关于绿岩具象牌匾的研究相一致,但试图增加关于Cacaxtla Xochitécatl和Xochicalco考古遗址17块具象牌匾(7块来自CacaxtlaXochit etécatl(A至G),10块来自Xochicacco(H至Q))的例子并加深思考(图2)。我将评估它们的上下文、用途和
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Res is a journal of anthropology and comparative aesthetics dedicated to the study of the object, in particular cult and belief objects and objects of art. The journal brings together, in an anthropological perspective, contributions by philosophers, art historians, archaeologists, critics, linguists, architects, artists, and others. Its field of inquiry is open to all cultures, regions, and historical periods. Res also seeks to make available textual and iconographic documents of importance for the history and theory of the arts.
期刊最新文献
Five invisible lines, before and after the Reformation The myth of Iphigenia in fourth-century funerary vases of southern Italy Nose ornaments When shrines and images grow tired A wooden hand from Easter Island (Rapa Nui), part I
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1