Seeing Through Adorno’s Prism

Q3 Social Sciences Geographische Zeitschrift Pub Date : 2021-07-01 DOI:10.25162/gz-2021-0010
Matthew Durey
{"title":"Seeing Through Adorno’s Prism","authors":"Matthew Durey","doi":"10.25162/gz-2021-0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cultural and creative industries have become a vibrant field of research in recent years. Increasing their contributions to GDP and encompassing a growing share of the labour market, cultural and creative industries have become a common feature in many areas of policy and research, and, especially in urban contexts, have become associated with significant spatial transformations. While the origin of the concept of ‘culture industry’ in the work of Adorno and Horkheimer is often acknowledged, contemporary scholarship in the field of cultural and creative industries has typically paid very little attention to the theoretical work – specifically Adorno’s critique of ‘identity thinking’ and the importance of contradiction and the preponderance of the object which formed the basis of his negative dialectics – which underpinned his arguments concerning the commodification and standardization of cultural products. Consequently, important insights in Adorno’s work are \nfrequently overlooked in contemporary accounts of cultural and creative industries. This article situates Adorno’s arguments on the culture industry within his negative dialectics, and by applying his ‘logic of disintegration’ – or ‘prism’ – to the ‘creative city’, makes an argument for how Adorno’s ideas continue provide important insights into the geographies of cultural and creative industries in postindustrial society.","PeriodicalId":35646,"journal":{"name":"Geographische Zeitschrift","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geographische Zeitschrift","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25162/gz-2021-0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The cultural and creative industries have become a vibrant field of research in recent years. Increasing their contributions to GDP and encompassing a growing share of the labour market, cultural and creative industries have become a common feature in many areas of policy and research, and, especially in urban contexts, have become associated with significant spatial transformations. While the origin of the concept of ‘culture industry’ in the work of Adorno and Horkheimer is often acknowledged, contemporary scholarship in the field of cultural and creative industries has typically paid very little attention to the theoretical work – specifically Adorno’s critique of ‘identity thinking’ and the importance of contradiction and the preponderance of the object which formed the basis of his negative dialectics – which underpinned his arguments concerning the commodification and standardization of cultural products. Consequently, important insights in Adorno’s work are frequently overlooked in contemporary accounts of cultural and creative industries. This article situates Adorno’s arguments on the culture industry within his negative dialectics, and by applying his ‘logic of disintegration’ – or ‘prism’ – to the ‘creative city’, makes an argument for how Adorno’s ideas continue provide important insights into the geographies of cultural and creative industries in postindustrial society.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
透过阿多诺的棱镜看
近年来,文化创意产业已成为一个充满活力的研究领域。文化和创意产业对国内生产总值的贡献越来越大,在劳动力市场中所占的份额越来越大,已成为许多政策和研究领域的共同特征,特别是在城市环境中,已与重大的空间转变联系在一起。虽然“文化工业”概念的起源在阿多诺和霍克海默的作品中经常得到承认,文化和创意产业领域的当代学术通常很少关注理论工作——特别是阿多诺对“身份思维”的批判,以及构成他的否定辩证法基础的矛盾的重要性和客体的优势——这支撑了他关于文化产品商品化和标准化的论点。因此,阿多诺作品中的重要见解在当代对文化和创意产业的描述中经常被忽视。本文将阿多诺关于文化产业的论述置于他的否定辩证法中,并通过将他的“解体逻辑”或“棱镜”应用于“创意城市”,论证了阿多诺的思想如何继续为后工业社会的文化和创意产业的地理提供重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Geographische Zeitschrift
Geographische Zeitschrift Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: Die Geographische Zeitschrift gehört seit ihrem Beginn im Jahr 1895 zu den führenden deutschsprachigen Zeitschriften ihres Faches. Heute widmet sich die Zeitschrift in meist deutschsprachigen aber auch englischen Beiträgen den Gegenwartsfragen der Anthropogeographie. Als international renommiertes Fachmedium ist sie einem hohen theoretischen und methodischen Anspruch verpflichtet. Die Qualität und Aktualität der Beiträge wird durch internationale Sachverständige — als "refereed journal" — garantiert. Gerade indem sie die traditionellen Grenzen ihres Faches überschreitet, trägt die Geographische Zeitschrift maßgeblich zur Weiterentwicklung und Fortschritt der Anthropogeographie bei.
期刊最新文献
Aus der Perspektive der Migration Lateinamerikanische Geographien Territorium und Multiterritorialität in dekolonialer Perspektive Körper, Raum und Territorium in Lateinamerika Die Politische Ökologie Lateinamerikas im Dialog mit der Geographie
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1