Gender identity in the era of mass incarceration: The cruel and unusual segregation of trans people in the United States

IF 1.1 3区 社会学 Q2 LAW Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law Pub Date : 2023-05-21 DOI:10.1093/icon/moad046
Federica Coppola
{"title":"Gender identity in the era of mass incarceration: The cruel and unusual segregation of trans people in the United States","authors":"Federica Coppola","doi":"10.1093/icon/moad046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The scarce legal recognition of the gender identity of trans people is a contributing factor to the phenomenon of mass incarceration in the United States. The disproportionately higher rates of incarceration of trans people—especially trans people of color—are driven by discrimination-based barriers to housing, employment, education, and trans-specific healthcare. The denial of trans identity in prison results in the ill-treatment of trans persons, including a heightened exposure to assault and violence. Concerningly, incarcerated trans people are commonly confronted with harsh conditions of confinement such as solitary confinement, which are generally enacted to (presumably) protect their own safety. Against this backdrop, this article advances Eighth Amendment-based arguments for (indirectly) affording a more consistent constitutional protection to gender self-determination in prison settings. First, the article argues that a more robust dignity-based interpretation of the Eighth Amendment regarding the conditions of confinement can lead to recognizing (self-determined) gender-affirming placement as a basic human need, the deprivation of which causes constitutionally relevant harm. The second argument relies upon penal theory to illustrate that the denial of gender self-determination in prison settings, with all the negative corollaries it implies, contradicts the fundamental pillars of each major justification for punishment. Thus, such a denial does not serve any constitutionally justified penological need.","PeriodicalId":51599,"journal":{"name":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Icon-International Journal of Constitutional Law","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/moad046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The scarce legal recognition of the gender identity of trans people is a contributing factor to the phenomenon of mass incarceration in the United States. The disproportionately higher rates of incarceration of trans people—especially trans people of color—are driven by discrimination-based barriers to housing, employment, education, and trans-specific healthcare. The denial of trans identity in prison results in the ill-treatment of trans persons, including a heightened exposure to assault and violence. Concerningly, incarcerated trans people are commonly confronted with harsh conditions of confinement such as solitary confinement, which are generally enacted to (presumably) protect their own safety. Against this backdrop, this article advances Eighth Amendment-based arguments for (indirectly) affording a more consistent constitutional protection to gender self-determination in prison settings. First, the article argues that a more robust dignity-based interpretation of the Eighth Amendment regarding the conditions of confinement can lead to recognizing (self-determined) gender-affirming placement as a basic human need, the deprivation of which causes constitutionally relevant harm. The second argument relies upon penal theory to illustrate that the denial of gender self-determination in prison settings, with all the negative corollaries it implies, contradicts the fundamental pillars of each major justification for punishment. Thus, such a denial does not serve any constitutionally justified penological need.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
大规模监禁时代的性别认同:美国对跨性别者残酷而不寻常的隔离
法律对跨性别者性别认同的缺乏承认,是造成美国大规模监禁现象的一个因素。跨性别者——尤其是有色人种的跨性别者——被监禁的比例高得不成比例,这是由住房、就业、教育和针对跨性别者的医疗保健方面的歧视障碍造成的。在监狱中拒绝变性人的身份导致变性人受到虐待,包括更容易受到攻击和暴力。令人担忧的是,被监禁的跨性别者通常面临着严酷的监禁条件,比如单独监禁,这通常是为了(大概)保护他们自己的安全。在此背景下,本文提出了基于第八修正案的论点,即(间接地)为监狱环境中的性别自决提供更一致的宪法保护。首先,文章认为,对第八修正案关于禁闭条件的更强有力的基于尊严的解释可能导致承认(自我决定的)性别肯定安置是一种基本的人类需求,剥夺这种需求会造成与宪法相关的伤害。第二个论点依靠刑法理论来说明,在监狱环境中否认性别自决,以及它所暗示的所有负面必然结果,与每一个主要惩罚理由的基本支柱相矛盾。因此,这种拒绝不符合任何合乎宪法的刑罚需要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.00
自引率
20.00%
发文量
67
期刊最新文献
Can the people exercise constituent power? Route 66: Mutations of the internal market explored through the prism of citation networks Parallel incorporation and public law Naming and (mis)informing in academic publications The political economy of effective judicial remedies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1