Mammalian responses to fire on Newnes Plateau: A yardstick for future recovery

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Australian Zoologist Pub Date : 2022-06-24 DOI:10.7882/az.2022.025
Andrew J. Lothian, M. J. Denny, Nicholas W. Tong
{"title":"Mammalian responses to fire on Newnes Plateau: A yardstick for future recovery","authors":"Andrew J. Lothian, M. J. Denny, Nicholas W. Tong","doi":"10.7882/az.2022.025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n A major fire swept through Newnes Plateau near Lithgow in 2013, burning 50,000 hectares of bushland. Long-term monitoring programs were already established, with half the sites impacted by the fire. It was then possible to record changes in fauna populations in response to the fire. Detailed surveys for a range of mammalian fauna were undertaken twice a year from 2011 to 2019. The results from the comprehensive surveys showed that even with high intensity fire over a large portion of the landscape, habitat recovery is relatively quick. Significant Before-After Control-Impact differences were observed for five microhabitat metrics. Ground cover components (forb and fern) returned to pre-fire levels quickly (within 0.5 years). Mid storey components returned to pre-fire levels within 6.0 years of the fire.\n Small mammal responses are species specific, but again, most return to pre-fire (or at least Control site) levels within 6.0 years. Antechinus mimetes mimetes is one exception, disappearing from Impact sites within 2.0 years of the 2013 fire. Recovery of both Rattus species was faster than Antechinus, and coincided with return of low shrub cover to unburnt site levels. Recovery to control site levels was often faster than to pre-fire levels. The arboreal mammal Petauroides volans increased (non-significantly) post-fire in Control sites, contrasting with declines seen in the species at lower elevations.\n Total native, non-volant mammal abundance at each site declined with fire (more so at burnt sites), yet species richness remained the same. Simpson’s Diversity Index increased post-fire in burnt sites. These three factors combine to suggest that all species in the community assemblage remain present after fire, albeit at lower levels than prior to the fire.\n Broad-scale, long term fauna monitoring has allowed us to analyse mammal and habitat responses to fire, though there are limitations placed on interpretations. Habitat Complexity Score is too coarse a metric to tease out differences in overall or lower habitat categories. Presence/absence data also limit our ability to fully describe site occupation for larger/introduced mammal species. The design of our analyses, however, provide a robust framework for analysing fauna responses to fire, and can be used to predict expected recovery trajectories for mammal populations after the larger, more recent Gospers Mountain fire in 2019.","PeriodicalId":35849,"journal":{"name":"Australian Zoologist","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-24","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Zoologist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7882/az.2022.025","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

A major fire swept through Newnes Plateau near Lithgow in 2013, burning 50,000 hectares of bushland. Long-term monitoring programs were already established, with half the sites impacted by the fire. It was then possible to record changes in fauna populations in response to the fire. Detailed surveys for a range of mammalian fauna were undertaken twice a year from 2011 to 2019. The results from the comprehensive surveys showed that even with high intensity fire over a large portion of the landscape, habitat recovery is relatively quick. Significant Before-After Control-Impact differences were observed for five microhabitat metrics. Ground cover components (forb and fern) returned to pre-fire levels quickly (within 0.5 years). Mid storey components returned to pre-fire levels within 6.0 years of the fire. Small mammal responses are species specific, but again, most return to pre-fire (or at least Control site) levels within 6.0 years. Antechinus mimetes mimetes is one exception, disappearing from Impact sites within 2.0 years of the 2013 fire. Recovery of both Rattus species was faster than Antechinus, and coincided with return of low shrub cover to unburnt site levels. Recovery to control site levels was often faster than to pre-fire levels. The arboreal mammal Petauroides volans increased (non-significantly) post-fire in Control sites, contrasting with declines seen in the species at lower elevations. Total native, non-volant mammal abundance at each site declined with fire (more so at burnt sites), yet species richness remained the same. Simpson’s Diversity Index increased post-fire in burnt sites. These three factors combine to suggest that all species in the community assemblage remain present after fire, albeit at lower levels than prior to the fire. Broad-scale, long term fauna monitoring has allowed us to analyse mammal and habitat responses to fire, though there are limitations placed on interpretations. Habitat Complexity Score is too coarse a metric to tease out differences in overall or lower habitat categories. Presence/absence data also limit our ability to fully describe site occupation for larger/introduced mammal species. The design of our analyses, however, provide a robust framework for analysing fauna responses to fire, and can be used to predict expected recovery trajectories for mammal populations after the larger, more recent Gospers Mountain fire in 2019.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
哺乳动物对纽内斯高原火灾的反应:未来恢复的标尺
2013年,一场大火席卷了利思高附近的纽内斯高原,烧毁了50000公顷的灌木丛。长期监测计划已经建立,一半的现场受到火灾的影响。然后就有可能记录动物群因火灾而发生的变化。2011年至2019年,每年对一系列哺乳动物进行两次详细调查。综合调查的结果表明,即使大部分景观发生高强度火灾,栖息地的恢复也相对较快。在五个微生境指标中观察到显著的控制前后影响差异。地被植物成分(forb和fern)很快恢复到火灾前的水平(在0.5年内)。火灾发生后6.0年内,中层构件恢复到火灾前的水平。小型哺乳动物的反应是特定物种的,但同样,大多数哺乳动物在6.0年内恢复到火灾前(或至少控制点)的水平。Antechinus模拟物是一个例外,在2013年大火发生后的2.0年内就从撞击现场消失了。两种Rattus的恢复速度都快于Antechinus,并且与低灌木覆盖率恢复到未燃烧场地水平相吻合。恢复到控制现场水平通常比恢复到火灾前水平更快。控制区火灾后,树栖哺乳动物Petauroides volans数量增加(不显著),与低海拔地区的数量减少形成对比。每个地点的本地非火山哺乳动物的总数量都随着火灾而下降(在被烧毁的地点更是如此),但物种丰富度保持不变。火灾发生后,被烧毁地点的Simpson多样性指数有所上升。这三个因素结合在一起表明,群落中的所有物种在火灾后仍然存在,尽管其水平低于火灾前。大规模、长期的动物群监测使我们能够分析哺乳动物和栖息地对火灾的反应,尽管解释存在局限性。栖息地复杂性得分是一个过于粗糙的指标,无法区分总体或较低栖息地类别的差异。存在/不存在数据也限制了我们充分描述大型/引进哺乳动物物种的场地占用情况的能力。然而,我们的分析设计为分析动物群对火灾的反应提供了一个强有力的框架,并可用于预测2019年戈斯珀斯山大火后哺乳动物种群的预期恢复轨迹。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Zoologist
Australian Zoologist Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Animal Science and Zoology
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊介绍: The Royal Zoological Society publishes a fully refereed scientific journal, Australian Zoologist, specialising in topics relevant to Australian zoology. The Australian Zoologist was first published by the Society in 1914, making it the oldest Australian journal specialising in zoological topics. The scope of the journal has increased substantially in the last 20 years, and it now attracts papers on a wide variety of zoological, ecological and environmentally related topics. The RZS also publishes, as books, and the outcome of forums, which are run annually by the Society.
期刊最新文献
Biodiverse cities or green light for biological invasions? Koala density, habitat, conservation, and response to logging in eucalyptus forest; a review and critical evaluation of call monitoring Home-range positions in a bird community from south-eastern Australia - questions and answers Rat lungworm, Cryptosporidium and other zoonotic pathogens of Rattus rattus and native wildlife on Sydney's Northern beaches 1 Million Turtles: empowering communities to save Australian freshwater turtles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1