Associations between Light Rail Transit and physical activity: a systematic review

IF 9.5 1区 工程技术 Q1 TRANSPORTATION Transport Reviews Pub Date : 2023-03-01 DOI:10.1080/01441647.2022.2099999
Léa Ravensbergen , Rania Wasfi , Mathilde Van Liefferinge , Isidor Ehrlich , Stephanie A. Prince , Gregory Butler , Yan Kestens , Ahmed El-Geneidy
{"title":"Associations between Light Rail Transit and physical activity: a systematic review","authors":"Léa Ravensbergen ,&nbsp;Rania Wasfi ,&nbsp;Mathilde Van Liefferinge ,&nbsp;Isidor Ehrlich ,&nbsp;Stephanie A. Prince ,&nbsp;Gregory Butler ,&nbsp;Yan Kestens ,&nbsp;Ahmed El-Geneidy","doi":"10.1080/01441647.2022.2099999","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Investment in public transport is on the rise as many cities around the world aim to reduce their carbon footprint and improve population health. One such investment is building or extending Light Rail Transit (LRT). Focusing on studies in the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, this paper reports the results of a systematic review on the associations between LRT and physical activity. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Twenty studies were identified through a search of five bibliographic databases (Web of Science, Transport Research International Documentation (TRID), Scopus, Medline, and SPORTDiscus) (n=5,866) and a systematic Google search (n=446). At least two reviewers conducted the search and reviewed the titles and abstract of each identified article to include in the review. Standardized data extraction forms were used to document information from each selected article. The forms included a risk of bias assessment tool. Two reviewers completed the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Our findings show that moderate certainty of evidence exists for the relationship between LRT and walking behaviour. Here, all studies, most of which were natural experiments (n = 6), found a positive association between LRT and walking behaviour, with LRT leading to an increase of 7–40% in walking in most studies (n = 7 out of 8). A positive relationship between LRT and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and between LRT and cycling was also often identified; however, results were inconsistent, and certainty of evidence is low for MPVA, and very low for cycling. Further, some studies (n = 3) identify differences in physical activity participation at different LRT stations, suggesting that station design, surrounding land use, and built environment play important roles in promoting physical activity around LRT. Given this, practitioners can be relatively confident that LRT investments will result in increased walking behaviour.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48197,"journal":{"name":"Transport Reviews","volume":"43 2","pages":"Pages 234-263"},"PeriodicalIF":9.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transport Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/org/science/article/pii/S0144164723000302","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

Investment in public transport is on the rise as many cities around the world aim to reduce their carbon footprint and improve population health. One such investment is building or extending Light Rail Transit (LRT). Focusing on studies in the USA, Canada, Australia, and New Zealand, this paper reports the results of a systematic review on the associations between LRT and physical activity. This systematic review adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. Twenty studies were identified through a search of five bibliographic databases (Web of Science, Transport Research International Documentation (TRID), Scopus, Medline, and SPORTDiscus) (n=5,866) and a systematic Google search (n=446). At least two reviewers conducted the search and reviewed the titles and abstract of each identified article to include in the review. Standardized data extraction forms were used to document information from each selected article. The forms included a risk of bias assessment tool. Two reviewers completed the Effective Public Health Practice Project (EPHPP) Quality Assessment Tool for Quantitative Studies. Our findings show that moderate certainty of evidence exists for the relationship between LRT and walking behaviour. Here, all studies, most of which were natural experiments (n = 6), found a positive association between LRT and walking behaviour, with LRT leading to an increase of 7–40% in walking in most studies (n = 7 out of 8). A positive relationship between LRT and moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and between LRT and cycling was also often identified; however, results were inconsistent, and certainty of evidence is low for MPVA, and very low for cycling. Further, some studies (n = 3) identify differences in physical activity participation at different LRT stations, suggesting that station design, surrounding land use, and built environment play important roles in promoting physical activity around LRT. Given this, practitioners can be relatively confident that LRT investments will result in increased walking behaviour.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
轻轨交通与体育活动之间的关系:系统综述
随着世界上许多城市致力于减少碳足迹和改善人口健康,对公共交通的投资正在增加。其中一项投资是建设或扩建轻轨交通(LRT)。本文以美国、加拿大、澳大利亚和新西兰的研究为重点,对轻轨与身体活动之间的关系进行了系统综述。本系统评价遵循系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)声明。通过检索5个书目数据库(Web of Science、Transport Research International Documentation (TRID)、Scopus、Medline和SPORTDiscus) (n=5,866)和系统谷歌检索(n=446),确定了20项研究。至少有两名审稿人进行了检索,并审查了每篇确定的文章的标题和摘要。标准化数据提取表格用于记录每一篇选定文章的信息。这些表格包括一个偏见风险评估工具。两名审稿人完成了有效公共卫生实践项目(EPHPP)定量研究质量评估工具。我们的研究结果表明,存在中度确定性的证据,证明轻轨和步行行为之间存在关系。在这里,所有的研究,其中大多数是自然实验(n = 6),都发现了LRT与步行行为之间的正相关,在大多数研究中,LRT导致步行增加7 - 40% (n = 7 / 8)。LRT与中高强度身体活动(MVPA)之间以及LRT与骑自行车之间的正相关关系也经常被发现;然而,结果是不一致的,证据的确定性是低的MPVA,非常低的自行车。此外,一些研究(n = 3)发现了不同轻轨站点体育活动参与的差异,表明站点设计、周边土地利用和建成环境在促进轻轨站点体育活动方面发挥了重要作用。鉴于此,从业者可以相对自信地认为,轻轨投资将导致步行行为的增加。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transport Reviews
Transport Reviews TRANSPORTATION-
CiteScore
17.70
自引率
1.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Transport Reviews is an international journal that comprehensively covers all aspects of transportation. It offers authoritative and current research-based reviews on transportation-related topics, catering to a knowledgeable audience while also being accessible to a wide readership. Encouraging submissions from diverse disciplinary perspectives such as economics and engineering, as well as various subject areas like social issues and the environment, Transport Reviews welcomes contributions employing different methodological approaches, including modeling, qualitative methods, or mixed-methods. The reviews typically introduce new methodologies, analyses, innovative viewpoints, and original data, although they are not limited to research-based content.
期刊最新文献
Forecasting travel in urban America: the socio-technical life of an engineering modeling world Spatial factors associated with usage of different on-demand elements within mobility hubs: a systematic literature review Measuring transport-associated urban inequalities: Where are we and where do we go from here? Human factors affecting truck – vulnerable road user safety: a scoping review A survey on reinforcement learning-based control for signalized intersections with connected automated vehicles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1