How far are we from understanding corruption? The effect of cultural distance on corruption perception

Mike Szymanski, Ivan Valdovinos, E. Kaltenecker
{"title":"How far are we from understanding corruption? The effect of cultural distance on corruption perception","authors":"Mike Szymanski, Ivan Valdovinos, E. Kaltenecker","doi":"10.1108/CPOIB-06-2020-0079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThis study aims to examine the relationship between cultural distances between countries and their scores in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI), which is the most commonly used measure of corruption in international business (IB) research.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe authors applied fixed-effect (generalized least squares) statistical modeling technique to analyze 1,580 year-country observations.\n\n\nFindings\nThe authors found that the CPI score is determined to a large extent by cultural distances between countries, specifically the distance to the USA and to Denmark.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nCPI is often used as a sole measure of state-level corruption in IB research. The results show that the measure is significantly influenced by cultural differences and hence it should be applied with great caution, preferably augmented with other measures.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to look at cultural distances as determinants of CPI score. The authors empirically test whether the CPI is culturally biased.\n","PeriodicalId":46124,"journal":{"name":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Critical Perspectives on International Business","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/CPOIB-06-2020-0079","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

Purpose This study aims to examine the relationship between cultural distances between countries and their scores in the Corruption Perception Index (CPI), which is the most commonly used measure of corruption in international business (IB) research. Design/methodology/approach The authors applied fixed-effect (generalized least squares) statistical modeling technique to analyze 1,580 year-country observations. Findings The authors found that the CPI score is determined to a large extent by cultural distances between countries, specifically the distance to the USA and to Denmark. Research limitations/implications CPI is often used as a sole measure of state-level corruption in IB research. The results show that the measure is significantly influenced by cultural differences and hence it should be applied with great caution, preferably augmented with other measures. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study to look at cultural distances as determinants of CPI score. The authors empirically test whether the CPI is culturally biased.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
我们离理解腐败还有多远?文化距离对腐败感知的影响
目的本研究旨在检验国家之间的文化距离与其在腐败感知指数(CPI)中的得分之间的关系,CPI是国际商业研究中最常用的衡量腐败的指标。设计/方法论/方法作者应用固定效应(广义最小二乘)统计建模技术分析1580 年国别观察。研究结果作者发现,CPI得分在很大程度上是由国家之间的文化距离决定的,特别是与美国和丹麦的距离。研究局限性/含义CPI通常被用作IB研究中衡量州级腐败的唯一指标。结果表明,该措施受到文化差异的显著影响,因此应非常谨慎地应用,最好与其他措施相结合。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一项将文化距离视为CPI得分决定因素的研究。作者实证检验了CPI是否具有文化偏见。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
15.00%
发文量
17
期刊介绍: In recent years, the business practices and management philosophies of global enterprises have been subject to increasingly close scrutiny by commentators in the fields of journalism and academia. Such scrutiny has been motivated by a growing desire to examine the nature of globalisation, its impact on specific communities and its benefits for society as a whole. Coverage includes, but is not restricted to, issues of: ■Globalization ■Production and consumption ■Economic change ■Societal change ■Politics and power of organizations and governments ■Environmental impact
期刊最新文献
Understanding academic women’s silence in Poland: exploring with social cognitive theory Sustainability in business education: a systematic review and future research agenda Transcending the DEI contradictions: a Bourdieusian path to social justice in international business De-othering: indigenous perspectives on diversity, equity and inclusion Co-creating inclusion in research practices in the South Pacific: some highlights and challenges
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1