Public attitudes to population data research in 2022.

IF 1.6 Q3 HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES International Journal of Population Data Science Pub Date : 2022-08-25 DOI:10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2019
Shayda Kashef, Marylouise Cowan, Elizabeth Waind
{"title":"Public attitudes to population data research in 2022.","authors":"Shayda Kashef, Marylouise Cowan, Elizabeth Waind","doi":"10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ObjectivesBroad public acceptability of research using data and statistics entails demonstrating trustworthiness and understanding public needs to maximise public benefit. Insight into public attitudes is crucial for informing how to operate in a trustworthy way and within the public interest.\nApproachIn 2022, two UK-wide public dialogues were undertaken to explore attitudes regarding the use of data and statistics in research. The first, explored views towards the creation of a more joined-up, efficient and trustworthy national data research infrastructure. The second aimed at understanding public perceptions of ‘public good’ of data and statistics. Both took a deliberative approach and involved diverse participation from members of the UK public. Both also sought the expertise of stakeholders within the data and statistics communities to inform the process.\nResultsThe first dialogue found that the public want:\n\nmore proactive transparency around data research processes, with greater efforts made to raise awareness about it and the security processes in place;\nmeaningful and inclusive public involvement and engagement;\na more standardised, centralised and unified approach to data research across the UK; and\nfor sensitive data to be made safely and securely available to researchers for projects in the public benefit, regardless of whether those researchers sit within academia, government or the private sector.\n\nThe second dialogue launched in March; results will be publicly available by the middle of summer. The findings of this dialogue are intended to influence policy and process relating to the use of data and statistics.\nConclusionThe first dialogue emphasises that the public are supportive of data research. And whilst reassured by security processes, they also do not want them to unduly hinder public benefit. Attendees at the IPDLN Conference will be some of the first to hear about the findings from the second dialogue.","PeriodicalId":36483,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Population Data Science","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Population Data Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v7i3.2019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ObjectivesBroad public acceptability of research using data and statistics entails demonstrating trustworthiness and understanding public needs to maximise public benefit. Insight into public attitudes is crucial for informing how to operate in a trustworthy way and within the public interest. ApproachIn 2022, two UK-wide public dialogues were undertaken to explore attitudes regarding the use of data and statistics in research. The first, explored views towards the creation of a more joined-up, efficient and trustworthy national data research infrastructure. The second aimed at understanding public perceptions of ‘public good’ of data and statistics. Both took a deliberative approach and involved diverse participation from members of the UK public. Both also sought the expertise of stakeholders within the data and statistics communities to inform the process. ResultsThe first dialogue found that the public want: more proactive transparency around data research processes, with greater efforts made to raise awareness about it and the security processes in place; meaningful and inclusive public involvement and engagement; a more standardised, centralised and unified approach to data research across the UK; and for sensitive data to be made safely and securely available to researchers for projects in the public benefit, regardless of whether those researchers sit within academia, government or the private sector. The second dialogue launched in March; results will be publicly available by the middle of summer. The findings of this dialogue are intended to influence policy and process relating to the use of data and statistics. ConclusionThe first dialogue emphasises that the public are supportive of data research. And whilst reassured by security processes, they also do not want them to unduly hinder public benefit. Attendees at the IPDLN Conference will be some of the first to hear about the findings from the second dialogue.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
2022年公众对人口数据研究的态度。
目的提高公众对使用数据和统计数据进行研究的可接受性,需要证明可信度并了解公众需求,以最大限度地提高公众利益。洞察公众态度对于告知如何以值得信赖的方式在公众利益范围内运作至关重要。方法2022年,在英国范围内进行了两次公众对话,探讨人们对研究中使用数据和统计数据的态度。第一,探讨了建立一个更加联合、高效和值得信赖的国家数据研究基础设施的观点。第二个目的是了解公众对数据和统计的“公共利益”的看法。两者都采取了审慎的方式,并有英国公众的不同参与。双方还寻求数据和统计界利益攸关方的专业知识,为这一进程提供信息。结果第一次对话发现,公众希望:在数据研究过程中更加积极主动地提高透明度,并加大力度提高人们对数据研究和安全程序的认识;有意义和包容性的公众参与和参与;在英国各地采用更加标准化、集中化和统一的数据研究方法;以及将敏感数据安全可靠地提供给研究人员,用于公共利益项目,无论这些研究人员是学术界、政府还是私营部门。第二次对话于3月启动;结果将在仲夏公布。这次对话的结果旨在影响与使用数据和统计数据有关的政策和进程。结论第一次对话强调公众支持数据研究。虽然安全程序让他们放心,但他们也不希望它们过度阻碍公共利益。IPDLN会议的与会者将是第一批了解第二次对话结果的人。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
386
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Defining a low-risk birth cohort: a cohort study comparing two perinatal data sets in Ontario, Canada. Data resource profile: nutrition data in the VA million veteran program. Deprivation effects on length of stay and death of hospitalised COVID-19 patients in Greater Manchester. Variation in colorectal cancer treatment and outcomes in Scotland: real world evidence from national linked administrative health data. Examining the quality and population representativeness of linked survey and administrative data: guidance and illustration using linked 1958 National Child Development Study and Hospital Episode Statistics data
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1