Improvement of indexes of faculty members' Recruitment: The views of the experts

Mahdieh Dartomi, H. Moonaghi, M. Razavi, A. Emadzadeh, M. J. M. Azizi
{"title":"Improvement of indexes of faculty members' Recruitment: The views of the experts","authors":"Mahdieh Dartomi, H. Moonaghi, M. Razavi, A. Emadzadeh, M. J. M. Azizi","doi":"10.22038/FMEJ.2020.42143.1286","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background Universities and research institutes are among the most significant mainstays of a society growth and its excellence. The need to support the higher education sector requires the increasing of attractions associated with this sector be entice specialized workforce, especially qualified faculty members to serve in these organizations. Thus, this study aimed to determine the status of faculty recruitment indicators at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The present study confirmed that it is necessary to improve the status of faculty recruitment indicators given the lack of valid and adequate indicators.  Methods This study was conducted based on the focus group method as well as gathering the experts and benefactors’ opinions on the faculty member recruitment process. In the focus group meetings, the status of the components comprising the form of academic expertise score of the volunteer faculty members was reviewed in accordance with the regulations of admission. However, it was finally revised and developed.  Results The research findings revealed that the necessary points, documents, and the scoring approach for the research and educational components of this form should be revised. The revision should be arranged in a manner that the number of points assigned to the educational components increases in proportion to the total points of the form; however, some components were removed and some added. Furthermore, improvements should be made in the scoring approach and the necessary documents to review these components.  Conclusion Ultimately, data analysis led to the classification of revisions about the current form of the volunteer's scientific expertise and the design of a new form from the specialists’ perspectives.","PeriodicalId":34243,"journal":{"name":"Future of Medical Education Journal","volume":"10 1","pages":"21-30"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future of Medical Education Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22038/FMEJ.2020.42143.1286","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background Universities and research institutes are among the most significant mainstays of a society growth and its excellence. The need to support the higher education sector requires the increasing of attractions associated with this sector be entice specialized workforce, especially qualified faculty members to serve in these organizations. Thus, this study aimed to determine the status of faculty recruitment indicators at Mashhad University of Medical Sciences. The present study confirmed that it is necessary to improve the status of faculty recruitment indicators given the lack of valid and adequate indicators.  Methods This study was conducted based on the focus group method as well as gathering the experts and benefactors’ opinions on the faculty member recruitment process. In the focus group meetings, the status of the components comprising the form of academic expertise score of the volunteer faculty members was reviewed in accordance with the regulations of admission. However, it was finally revised and developed.  Results The research findings revealed that the necessary points, documents, and the scoring approach for the research and educational components of this form should be revised. The revision should be arranged in a manner that the number of points assigned to the educational components increases in proportion to the total points of the form; however, some components were removed and some added. Furthermore, improvements should be made in the scoring approach and the necessary documents to review these components.  Conclusion Ultimately, data analysis led to the classification of revisions about the current form of the volunteer's scientific expertise and the design of a new form from the specialists’ perspectives.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
提高教职工招聘指标——专家观点
背景大学和研究机构是社会发展和卓越的最重要支柱之一。支持高等教育部门的需要需要增加与该部门相关的吸引力,以吸引专业劳动力,特别是合格的教师在这些组织中服务。因此,本研究旨在确定马什哈德医学科学大学教师招聘指标的现状。本研究证实,鉴于缺乏有效和充分的指标,有必要改善教师招聘指标的状况。方法本研究采用焦点小组法,并收集专家和资助者对教师招聘过程的意见。在焦点小组会议上,根据录取规定,对志愿者教员的学术专业知识分数形式组成部分的状况进行了审查。然而,它最终得到了修订和发展。结果研究结果表明,该表格的研究和教育组成部分的必要要点、文件和评分方法应该进行修订。修订的安排应使分配给教育部分的分数与表格的总分数成比例增加;然而,一些组件被移除,一些被添加。此外,应改进评分方法和审查这些组成部分所需的文件。结论最终,通过数据分析,对志愿者科学专业知识的现有形式进行了分类修订,并从专家的角度设计了一种新的形式。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
9 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of Virtual Education of Nutrition Programs in the Health System Evolution Plan on the Knowledge and Performance of Primary Health Workers (Behvarzes) in Mashhad, Iran Based on the Kirkpatrick Model in 2020 Creating a caring learning environment in nursing education The Relationship between Interpersonal and Intrapersonal Intelligences and Classroom Management Strategies among Instructors of English for Medical Sciences Can a psychological-educational supportive intervention enhance the psychological well-being and academic performance of freshman medical students? Proposing an Effective Model for Improving Integration the Medical Education System with Health Services at Iran's Ministry of Health and Medical Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1