Quantification of Mental and Physiological Workload Associated with two Specialised Military Running Events on Different Terrains

Q3 Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics Defence Life Science Journal Pub Date : 2022-09-13 DOI:10.14429/dlsj.7.17841
T. Chatterjee, D. Bhattacharyya, A. Yadav, K. Arya, R. Meena, M. Pal
{"title":"Quantification of Mental and Physiological Workload Associated with two Specialised Military Running Events on Different Terrains","authors":"T. Chatterjee, D. Bhattacharyya, A. Yadav, K. Arya, R. Meena, M. Pal","doi":"10.14429/dlsj.7.17841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Intense training regimes are practiced across military facilities to develop soldiers’ mental and physical abilities to meet the demands of modern-day warfare. Two short-duration military runs through the jungle and flat natural tracks were selected to quantify their mental and physiological workloads and explore track-specific differences. Two groups of healthy Indian soldiers (n=43 and 30; similar age, height, and weight) participated in time-bound 2.4 km runs on the jungle and flat natural tracks. Physiological variables, speed, and elevation with environmental parameters like temperature and humidity were recorded throughout the exercises. Subjective responses through NASA-TLX questionnaires were collected after the exercises. Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test was applied to find out the level of significance between groups.Physiological demands of runs on the jungle and flat natural track were similar (heart rate- 178.9 and 178.4 b/min; breathing rate- 42.0 and 46.6 breaths/min respectively; body temperature- 37.6℃ for both groups). The run on the jungle track needed a lower peak acceleration of 2.5 g (2.9 g on the flat track) and a higher variation in speed (4-16 knots). Participants expressed significantly high responses after the run on the jungle track. Run on the jungle track was physically intense, required adjustments in speed and acceleration to negotiate with the natural obstacles like uneven terrain and slippery surfaces. Besides this, environmental heat and higher humidity probably led to an increase in mental workload. The run on the flat natural track needed steady physical effort, fewer mechanical adjustments, and showed lower subjective responses.","PeriodicalId":36557,"journal":{"name":"Defence Life Science Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Defence Life Science Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14429/dlsj.7.17841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Intense training regimes are practiced across military facilities to develop soldiers’ mental and physical abilities to meet the demands of modern-day warfare. Two short-duration military runs through the jungle and flat natural tracks were selected to quantify their mental and physiological workloads and explore track-specific differences. Two groups of healthy Indian soldiers (n=43 and 30; similar age, height, and weight) participated in time-bound 2.4 km runs on the jungle and flat natural tracks. Physiological variables, speed, and elevation with environmental parameters like temperature and humidity were recorded throughout the exercises. Subjective responses through NASA-TLX questionnaires were collected after the exercises. Mann-Whitney ‘U’ test was applied to find out the level of significance between groups.Physiological demands of runs on the jungle and flat natural track were similar (heart rate- 178.9 and 178.4 b/min; breathing rate- 42.0 and 46.6 breaths/min respectively; body temperature- 37.6℃ for both groups). The run on the jungle track needed a lower peak acceleration of 2.5 g (2.9 g on the flat track) and a higher variation in speed (4-16 knots). Participants expressed significantly high responses after the run on the jungle track. Run on the jungle track was physically intense, required adjustments in speed and acceleration to negotiate with the natural obstacles like uneven terrain and slippery surfaces. Besides this, environmental heat and higher humidity probably led to an increase in mental workload. The run on the flat natural track needed steady physical effort, fewer mechanical adjustments, and showed lower subjective responses.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
两种特殊地形军事跑步项目的心理和生理负荷量化
在军事设施中实行高强度的训练制度,以发展士兵的精神和身体能力,以满足现代战争的要求。选择了两种穿越丛林和平坦的自然轨道的短时间军事跑步,以量化他们的心理和生理负荷,并探索轨道特异性差异。两组健康的印度士兵(n=43和30);年龄、身高、体重相近)在丛林和平坦的自然小道上参加了限时2.4公里的跑步。在整个运动过程中,记录了生理变量、速度和海拔以及温度和湿度等环境参数。练习结束后,通过NASA-TLX问卷收集主观反应。采用Mann-Whitney“U”检验来确定组间显著性水平。在丛林和平坦的自然跑道上跑步的生理需求相似(心率分别为178.9和178.4 b/min;呼吸频率-分别为42.0次和46.6次/分;两组体温均为37.6℃)。在丛林赛道上的跑步需要较低的峰值加速度2.5 g(在平坦赛道上为2.9 g)和较高的速度变化(4-16节)。参与者在丛林跑道上跑步后表现出明显的高反应。在丛林跑道上跑步是一项体力活动,需要调整速度和加速度,以克服不平坦的地形和湿滑的表面等自然障碍。除此之外,环境的高温和较高的湿度可能会导致精神负荷的增加。在平坦的自然跑道上跑步需要稳定的体力,较少的机械调整,并且表现出较低的主观反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Defence Life Science Journal
Defence Life Science Journal Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics-Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutics (all)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊最新文献
Altered Mitochondrial DNA Methylation Patterns in Thrombosis SUMO Sites Prediction in Human Transcription Factors Involved in Hypoxia induced Cardiac Illnesses Potential Candidate Molecules of Past and Present for Combating High Altitude Hypoxia Induced Maladies Metabolomics Unraveling the Biochemical Insight of High Altitude Diseases and Sepsis A Narrative Review Comparative Analysis of Low Lander Transcriptomes at Himalayas and Andes Reveals Differential Regulation of Erythropoiesis at Extreme Altitude
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1