Losers of Modernization: The Decline of Burgher Shooting Societies in Hungary, 1867–1914

IF 0.2 3区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1353/see.2023.a897284
Aliaksandr Piahanau
{"title":"Losers of Modernization: The Decline of Burgher Shooting Societies in Hungary, 1867–1914","authors":"Aliaksandr Piahanau","doi":"10.1353/see.2023.a897284","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:Shooting societies organized by town citizens (burghers) were considered the traditional guardians of many autonomous settlements in Central Europe from the Middle Ages up to the late nineteenth century. In seeking to identify the causes of their decline in late Habsburg Hungary, this article draws attention to a variety of modernizing drives that undermined the stability of burgher marksmanship. One was the emerging Hungarian nation-state, which hindered the development of paramilitary citizen groups by limiting local self-governance and freedom of association. Another was the modern appeal to ethnic homogenization in the form of Magyarization. It aroused hostility towards the burgher riflemen because of their frequent use of the German language and loyalty to the Habsburgs, and not to the Magyar nation. Although the surviving burgher shooting societies had espoused Magyar nationalism by the early 1900s, they nonetheless maintained their elitism, excluding the growing urban populations from membership. At the same time, the burgher riflemen failed to engage sufficiently actively in rifle training to secure the support of the Defence Ministry and the radical Magyar nationalists. Instead, they remained traditional venues for socializing and networking for the increasingly isolated ennobled petty bourgeoisie. This created a situation where the burgher marksmen became marginal players not only in urban political life but also in Hungary's rapidly developing paramilitary culture. The story of the decline of the burgher shooting societies sheds new light on the ambiguities of modernization, but also demonstrates the weakness of societal militarization in pre-1914 Central Europe.","PeriodicalId":45292,"journal":{"name":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","volume":"101 1","pages":"28 - 63"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/see.2023.a897284","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:Shooting societies organized by town citizens (burghers) were considered the traditional guardians of many autonomous settlements in Central Europe from the Middle Ages up to the late nineteenth century. In seeking to identify the causes of their decline in late Habsburg Hungary, this article draws attention to a variety of modernizing drives that undermined the stability of burgher marksmanship. One was the emerging Hungarian nation-state, which hindered the development of paramilitary citizen groups by limiting local self-governance and freedom of association. Another was the modern appeal to ethnic homogenization in the form of Magyarization. It aroused hostility towards the burgher riflemen because of their frequent use of the German language and loyalty to the Habsburgs, and not to the Magyar nation. Although the surviving burgher shooting societies had espoused Magyar nationalism by the early 1900s, they nonetheless maintained their elitism, excluding the growing urban populations from membership. At the same time, the burgher riflemen failed to engage sufficiently actively in rifle training to secure the support of the Defence Ministry and the radical Magyar nationalists. Instead, they remained traditional venues for socializing and networking for the increasingly isolated ennobled petty bourgeoisie. This created a situation where the burgher marksmen became marginal players not only in urban political life but also in Hungary's rapidly developing paramilitary culture. The story of the decline of the burgher shooting societies sheds new light on the ambiguities of modernization, but also demonstrates the weakness of societal militarization in pre-1914 Central Europe.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
现代化的失败者:匈牙利市民射击协会的衰落,1867-1914
摘要:从中世纪到19世纪后期,由城镇公民(市民)组织的射击社团被认为是中欧许多自治聚落的传统守护者。在寻找哈布斯堡王朝晚期匈牙利衰落的原因时,这篇文章引起了人们对各种现代化驱动的关注,这些驱动破坏了市民射击的稳定性。其一是匈牙利民族国家的出现,它通过限制地方自治和结社自由,阻碍了准军事公民团体的发展。另一个是现代对种族同质化的呼吁,即马格尔化。它引起了对市民步枪手的敌意,因为他们经常使用德语,忠于哈布斯堡王朝,而不是马扎尔民族。尽管幸存下来的市民射击协会在20世纪初就支持马扎尔民族主义,但它们仍然保持着精英主义,将不断增长的城市人口排除在会员之外。与此同时,市民步枪兵未能充分积极地参加步枪训练,以获得国防部和激进的马扎尔民族主义者的支持。相反,它们仍然是日益孤立的贵族小资产阶级社交和建立关系网的传统场所。这造成了这样一种局面:市民射手不仅在城市政治生活中,而且在匈牙利迅速发展的准军事文化中,都成了边缘角色。市民射击协会衰落的故事为现代化的模糊性提供了新的视角,但也表明了1914年前中欧社会军事化的弱点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW
SLAVONIC AND EAST EUROPEAN REVIEW HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
期刊介绍: The Review is the oldest British journal in the field, having been in existence since 1922. Edited and managed by the School of Slavonic and East European Studies, it covers not only the modern and medieval languages and literatures of the Slavonic and East European area, but also history, culture, and political studies. It is published in January, April, July, and October of each year.
期刊最新文献
London Through Russian Eyes, 1896–1914: An Anthology of Foreign Correspondence ed. by Anna Vaninskaya (review) Russia's Entangled Embrace: The Tsarist Empire and the Armenians, 1801–1914 by Stephen Badalyan Riegg (review) Stalin as Warlord by Alfred J. Rieber (review) Maria Renata Mayenowa and the Forgotten Legacy of Polish Theory of Literature and Poetics Klimat: Russia in the Age of Climate Change by Thane Gustafson (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1