A quantitative study of French 19th century geometry textbooks

Q3 Multidisciplinary Acta Scientiae Pub Date : 2023-03-27 DOI:10.17648/acta.scientiae.7191
C. Guillet
{"title":"A quantitative study of French 19th century geometry textbooks","authors":"C. Guillet","doi":"10.17648/acta.scientiae.7191","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: School textbooks constitute a valuable material of investigation in the history of education, which has developed in many disciplines, in connection with their history. In history of mathematics education, some studies are based on a qualitative analysis of a small number of textbooks, whereas others use quantitative arguments in addition. In this framework, my approach is to analyse the use of areas in French geometry textbooks of the 19th century, by articulating qualitative and quantitative methods, from a corpus that I have built. Objectives: In my study paper, I analyse information from statistical data collected on this corpus, and I put these results in perspective with other studies conducted in the history of school publishing and mathematics education. Design: My methodology consists in starting from hypotheses accepted in related studies, confronting them with my quantitative data, and then putting results into a qualitative perspective. Setting and participants: This work was carried out in conjunction with training on quantitative tools in human and social sciences provided by PROGEDO Loire in Nantes. Data collection and analysis: I first built up a database of geometry textbooks using a general source and exploited it statistically. Then, I studied specifically a more restricted corpus, focused on the notion of area, using multivariate analysis tools. Results: My results confirm some of the assumptions assumed in other studies (evolution of school publishing, porosity of primary and secondary education orders), challenge others (opposition between theoretical and practical geometry) and sometimes deepen them with additional information. Conclusion: This work answered questions but raised new ones, notably on links between sustainability, target audience and content on areas of a textbook.","PeriodicalId":36967,"journal":{"name":"Acta Scientiae","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Acta Scientiae","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17648/acta.scientiae.7191","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Multidisciplinary","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: School textbooks constitute a valuable material of investigation in the history of education, which has developed in many disciplines, in connection with their history. In history of mathematics education, some studies are based on a qualitative analysis of a small number of textbooks, whereas others use quantitative arguments in addition. In this framework, my approach is to analyse the use of areas in French geometry textbooks of the 19th century, by articulating qualitative and quantitative methods, from a corpus that I have built. Objectives: In my study paper, I analyse information from statistical data collected on this corpus, and I put these results in perspective with other studies conducted in the history of school publishing and mathematics education. Design: My methodology consists in starting from hypotheses accepted in related studies, confronting them with my quantitative data, and then putting results into a qualitative perspective. Setting and participants: This work was carried out in conjunction with training on quantitative tools in human and social sciences provided by PROGEDO Loire in Nantes. Data collection and analysis: I first built up a database of geometry textbooks using a general source and exploited it statistically. Then, I studied specifically a more restricted corpus, focused on the notion of area, using multivariate analysis tools. Results: My results confirm some of the assumptions assumed in other studies (evolution of school publishing, porosity of primary and secondary education orders), challenge others (opposition between theoretical and practical geometry) and sometimes deepen them with additional information. Conclusion: This work answered questions but raised new ones, notably on links between sustainability, target audience and content on areas of a textbook.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
法国19世纪几何教科书的定量研究
背景:学校教科书是教育史上一份有价值的调查材料,教育史在许多学科中都有发展,与它们的历史有关。在数学教育史上,一些研究是基于对少数教科书的定性分析,而另一些研究则使用了定量论证。在这个框架下,我的方法是从我建立的语料库中,通过阐明定性和定量的方法,分析19世纪法国几何教科书中区域的使用。目的:在我的研究论文中,我分析了在这个语料库中收集的统计数据中的信息,并将这些结果与学校出版和数学教育史上进行的其他研究相结合。设计:我的方法包括从相关研究中接受的假设开始,用我的定量数据面对它们,然后将结果放在定性的角度。背景和参与者:这项工作是在南特卢瓦尔省PROGEDO提供的人类和社会科学定量工具培训的同时进行的。数据收集和分析:我首先使用一般来源建立了一个几何教科书数据库,并对其进行了统计利用。然后,我使用多元分析工具专门研究了一个更受限制的语料库,重点研究了面积的概念。结果:我的研究结果证实了其他研究中假设的一些假设(学校出版的演变、中小学教育秩序的多孔性),挑战了其他假设(理论几何和实践几何之间的对立),有时还通过额外的信息加深了这些假设。结论:这项工作回答了问题,但提出了新的问题,特别是关于可持续性、目标受众和教科书各领域内容之间的联系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Acta Scientiae
Acta Scientiae Multidisciplinary-Multidisciplinary
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Preservice Mathematics Teachers' Beliefs about Problem-Solving in Culturally Diverse Classrooms Transitional-Apprehending Mental Model for Junior High School Students in Understanding the Concept of Integers Meaning of Problem in School Mathematics: From Exercise and Application to the Learning-Triggering Problem Learnings and Reflections by (Future) Teachers on Anticipation in Exploratory Mathematics Teaching Interdisciplinary Extension Program in Teaching: Challenges, Possibilities, and Unexpected Situations
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1