Time in Ecclesiastes and the Mahabharata

IF 0.2 4区 哲学 0 RELIGION ECUMENICAL REVIEW Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1111/erev.12748
Jebin Thankaraj
{"title":"Time in Ecclesiastes and the Mahabharata","authors":"Jebin Thankaraj","doi":"10.1111/erev.12748","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This article examines the implied assumption that the concept of time in both Ecclesiastes and the <i>Mahabharata</i> presents a predeterministic view of human life. Such a postulation favours the argument that humans are prisoners of time who cannot overcome their plight because they think that suffering, failure, and oppression are their destiny, determined by time. The analysis suggests that Qohelet neither professes strong predeterminis‑m of time in human life nor gives humans absolute control of their life in time. The <i>Mahabharata</i> does not critique time and predeterminism outright but attributes importance to human endeavours and responsibilities. The acceptance of external forces like time or fate does not completely deny that human power influences destiny. Since humans have the freedom to act in the present time, it is not suitable to claim that God through time predetermines poverty, oppression, violence, and atrocities in human life.</p>","PeriodicalId":43636,"journal":{"name":"ECUMENICAL REVIEW","volume":"74 5","pages":"807-827"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECUMENICAL REVIEW","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/erev.12748","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"RELIGION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This article examines the implied assumption that the concept of time in both Ecclesiastes and the Mahabharata presents a predeterministic view of human life. Such a postulation favours the argument that humans are prisoners of time who cannot overcome their plight because they think that suffering, failure, and oppression are their destiny, determined by time. The analysis suggests that Qohelet neither professes strong predeterminis‑m of time in human life nor gives humans absolute control of their life in time. The Mahabharata does not critique time and predeterminism outright but attributes importance to human endeavours and responsibilities. The acceptance of external forces like time or fate does not completely deny that human power influences destiny. Since humans have the freedom to act in the present time, it is not suitable to claim that God through time predetermines poverty, oppression, violence, and atrocities in human life.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《传道书》和《摩诃婆罗多》中的时间
这篇文章考察了隐含的假设,即传道书和摩诃婆罗多中的时间概念提出了一种人类生活的宿命论观点。这种假设支持这样一种观点,即人类是时间的囚徒,他们无法克服自己的困境,因为他们认为痛苦、失败和压迫是他们的命运,由时间决定。分析表明,Qohelet既没有宣称人类生命中的时间具有很强的预先决定性,也没有让人类对自己的生命在时间上有绝对的控制权。《摩诃婆罗多》并没有直接批判时间和宿命论,而是赋予了人类努力和责任的重要性。接受时间或命运等外部力量并不完全否认人的力量影响命运。既然人类在当下有行动的自由,那么声称上帝通过时间预先决定了人类生活中的贫穷、压迫、暴力和暴行是不合适的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ECUMENICAL REVIEW
ECUMENICAL REVIEW RELIGION-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
50.00%
发文量
51
期刊介绍: The Ecumenical Review is a quarterly theological journal. Each issue focuses on a theme of current importance to the movement for Christian unity, and each volume includes academic as well as practical analysis of significant moments in the quest for closer church fellowship and inter-religious dialogue. Recent issues have communicated the visions of a new generation of ecumenical leadership, the voices of women involved in Orthodox-Protestant conversations, churches" ministries in an age of HIV/AIDS and a celebration of the 100th anniversary of the Week of Prayer for Christian Unity.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Nicaea and Women’s Ordained Ministry The Ecumenical Review Hans-Georg Link and Joseph Wohlmuth, eds. Attraktive Fremdheit Gottes: Das ökumenische Bekenntnis von Nizäa-Konstantinopel (325–2025); Ausgelegt von Mitgliedern des Altenberger ökumenischen Gesprächskreises (The Attractive Strangeness of God: The Ecumenical Creed of Nicaea-Constantinople [325–2025]; interpreted by members of the Altenberg Ecumenical Discussion Group), with a foreword by Heinrich Bedford-Strohm. Leipzig: Evangelische Verlagsanstalt and Paderborn: Bonifatius, 2024. 288 pp. The Nicene Creed: Remembering What It Says; Re-membering What It Forgot to Say
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1