Effect of mulch, no-tillage and no-fertiliser as sustainable practices on soil organic carbon and carbon dioxide emission

Q2 Agricultural and Biological Sciences Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa Pub Date : 2021-09-02 DOI:10.1080/0035919X.2021.1995530
V. Ramborun, S. Facknath, B. Lalljee
{"title":"Effect of mulch, no-tillage and no-fertiliser as sustainable practices on soil organic carbon and carbon dioxide emission","authors":"V. Ramborun, S. Facknath, B. Lalljee","doi":"10.1080/0035919X.2021.1995530","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The study seeks to investigate the compounding effects of various practices such as mulch, no-tillage, tillage and nitrogen based fertilizer on CO2 emission and soil organic carbon (SOC) in three successive crop cycles in the region of Vacoas, Mauritius. Nitrogen based fertilizer (ammonium sulphate) was applied at 120 kg/ha to its corresponding treatment, and maize mulch was applied as full coverage (24 t/ha). Three treatments: Mulch (M), Fertilizer (F), Tillage (T), were tested at 2 levels each, and replicated 3 times. The 2 levels were mulch-no mulch, fertilizer-no fertilizer and tillage-no tillage. Results have shown a correlation between CO2 and pH, where increase in CO2 flux was due to addition of fertilizer. Furthermore, application of mulch did not increase SOC in the short term. A negative correlation was equally found between available phosphorous and temperature which was attributed to the interactions that exist between temperature, photosynthesis and nutrient availability. The present study revealed that reduction in CO2 emission and increase in soil fertility can be achieved at farmer level by adopting mulching and no-till. These practices are both economical and farmer friendly. This is a first study of such kind in the soils of Mauritius, a volcanic Island in the Indian Ocean latitude 20° 17′ 53″ South and longitude 57° 28′ 42″ East.","PeriodicalId":23255,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","volume":"76 1","pages":"247 - 255"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0035919X.2021.1995530","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

The study seeks to investigate the compounding effects of various practices such as mulch, no-tillage, tillage and nitrogen based fertilizer on CO2 emission and soil organic carbon (SOC) in three successive crop cycles in the region of Vacoas, Mauritius. Nitrogen based fertilizer (ammonium sulphate) was applied at 120 kg/ha to its corresponding treatment, and maize mulch was applied as full coverage (24 t/ha). Three treatments: Mulch (M), Fertilizer (F), Tillage (T), were tested at 2 levels each, and replicated 3 times. The 2 levels were mulch-no mulch, fertilizer-no fertilizer and tillage-no tillage. Results have shown a correlation between CO2 and pH, where increase in CO2 flux was due to addition of fertilizer. Furthermore, application of mulch did not increase SOC in the short term. A negative correlation was equally found between available phosphorous and temperature which was attributed to the interactions that exist between temperature, photosynthesis and nutrient availability. The present study revealed that reduction in CO2 emission and increase in soil fertility can be achieved at farmer level by adopting mulching and no-till. These practices are both economical and farmer friendly. This is a first study of such kind in the soils of Mauritius, a volcanic Island in the Indian Ocean latitude 20° 17′ 53″ South and longitude 57° 28′ 42″ East.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
覆盖、免耕和不施肥作为可持续做法对土壤有机碳和二氧化碳排放的影响
该研究旨在调查覆盖、免耕、耕作和氮肥等不同做法对毛里求斯Vacoas地区连续三个作物周期CO2排放和土壤有机碳(SOC)的复合效应。相应处理施氮肥(硫酸铵)120 kg/ha,全覆盖玉米地膜(24 t/ha)。3个处理:覆盖(M)、施肥(F)、耕作(T),每个处理2个水平,重复3次。这2个水平分别是覆盖-不覆盖、施肥-不施肥和耕作-不耕作。结果表明CO2与pH值之间存在相关性,其中CO2通量的增加是由于肥料的添加。此外,覆盖在短期内没有增加土壤有机碳。有效磷与温度呈负相关,这是由于温度、光合作用和养分有效性之间存在相互作用。本研究表明,在农户层面上,采用覆盖免耕可以达到减少CO2排放和提高土壤肥力的目的。这些做法既经济又有利于农民。这是对毛里求斯土壤的首次此类研究,毛里求斯是印度洋上的一个火山岛,南纬20°17 ' 53″,东经57°28 ' 42″。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa
Transactions of The Royal Society of South Africa Agricultural and Biological Sciences-Agricultural and Biological Sciences (all)
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Transactions of the Royal Society of South Africa , published on behalf of the Royal Society of South Africa since 1908, comprises a rich archive of original scientific research in and beyond South Africa. Since 1878, when it was founded as Transactions of the South African Philosophical Society, the Journal’s strength has lain in its multi- and inter-disciplinary orientation, which is aimed at ‘promoting the improvement and diffusion of science in all its branches’ (original Charter). Today this includes natural, physical, medical, environmental and earth sciences as well as any other topic that may be of interest or importance to the people of Africa. Transactions publishes original research papers, review articles, special issues, feature articles, festschriften and book reviews. While coverage emphasizes southern Africa, submissions concerning the rest of the continent are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Professor Michael (MIKE) Richard Perrin 28 December 1946–28 December 2023 Biophysical system perspectives on future change in African mountains Wattles: Australian Acacia species around the world Wattles: Australian Acacia species around the world : edited by D.M. Richardson, J.J. le Roux and Elizabete Marchante, Wallingford, UK, CABI, 2023, 544 pp., 185 Pounds Stirling (hardback), ISBN 978-1-80062-217-3 A systematic review on remote sensing of wetland environments Assessing plant utilisation by communities bordering a protected area in Zimbabwe using utilitarian diversity metrics
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1