Zwischen Ost und West: Franz Liszts nationale Identität in der Wiener Musikkritik (1857–1900)

IF 0.1 3区 艺术学 Q4 Arts and Humanities Studia Musicologica Pub Date : 2021-11-29 DOI:10.1556/6.2020.00022
{"title":"Zwischen Ost und West: Franz Liszts nationale Identität in der Wiener Musikkritik (1857–1900)","authors":"","doi":"10.1556/6.2020.00022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n In the second half of the nineteenth century, the Habsburg Monarchy was a political entity giving home to great numbers of people of different nationalities and ethnicities. However, the dominant power in the structure of this multi-ethnic state was reserved for the Germans. Yet, the ever more emphatic demands of ethnic groups of other origins for more autonomy had a serious impact on the political and cultural supremacy of the Germans. Based on this recorded background, I will examine in the context of my paper to what extent Viennese music criticism of Franz Liszt’s symphonic programme music proves to be influenced by the reception of his national facets of identity. To do justice to this concern, the first step is to gain an overview of what statements were made during the journalistic discourse on Liszt’s symphonic programme music regarding its nationality. Building on this, it will be determined what function these statements had in the argumentative mediation of the aesthetic judgement on Liszt’s programmatic compositions. Against the political background outlined above, the question arises as to whether the Hungarian-national facet of Liszt’s identity in particular was instrumentalized by Viennese critics in order to strengthen negative judgments about his œuvre by means of a politically motivated German-nationalist narrative.","PeriodicalId":34943,"journal":{"name":"Studia Musicologica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Musicologica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1556/6.2020.00022","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

In the second half of the nineteenth century, the Habsburg Monarchy was a political entity giving home to great numbers of people of different nationalities and ethnicities. However, the dominant power in the structure of this multi-ethnic state was reserved for the Germans. Yet, the ever more emphatic demands of ethnic groups of other origins for more autonomy had a serious impact on the political and cultural supremacy of the Germans. Based on this recorded background, I will examine in the context of my paper to what extent Viennese music criticism of Franz Liszt’s symphonic programme music proves to be influenced by the reception of his national facets of identity. To do justice to this concern, the first step is to gain an overview of what statements were made during the journalistic discourse on Liszt’s symphonic programme music regarding its nationality. Building on this, it will be determined what function these statements had in the argumentative mediation of the aesthetic judgement on Liszt’s programmatic compositions. Against the political background outlined above, the question arises as to whether the Hungarian-national facet of Liszt’s identity in particular was instrumentalized by Viennese critics in order to strengthen negative judgments about his œuvre by means of a politically motivated German-nationalist narrative.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
东西之间:弗兰茨·李斯茨在《维也纳音乐批判》中的国家身份(1857—1900)
在19世纪下半叶,哈布斯堡王朝是一个政治实体,居住着大量不同国籍和种族的人。然而,在这个多民族国家的结构中,主导权是留给德国人的。然而,其他出身的民族对更多自治权的日益强烈的要求对德国人的政治和文化霸权产生了严重影响。基于这一记录背景,我将在我的论文中研究维也纳音乐对弗朗茨·李斯特交响音乐的批评在多大程度上受到了对其民族身份认同的接受的影响。为了公正地对待这种担忧,第一步是了解在新闻报道中对李斯特交响乐节目音乐关于其国籍的陈述。在此基础上,我们将确定这些陈述在李斯特纲领性作品审美判断的论证中介中起到了什么作用。在上述政治背景下,出现了一个问题,即维也纳评论家是否利用李斯特身份的匈牙利民族方面,通过政治动机的德国民族主义叙事来加强对其作品的负面判断。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Studia Musicologica
Studia Musicologica Arts and Humanities-Music
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
For the Honorary Doctorate of Sir John Eliot Gardiner “Some Sort of Machine without a Body” “Breughelland”: Subverting the Antinomy of Utopia and Dystopia The Hybrid Musical Landscape of Ligeti's Late Concertos “Die Natur ist hier … zu Musik geworden”: György Ligeti and (Musical) Nature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1