Optimal Waiting Period for Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Based on Surgical Difficulty

K. Mino, K. Uemura, Takumu Fukasawa, Takuto Suzuki, Tomoya Saito, Chisato Shirakawa, T. Yoshida, T. Ohata, Y. Konishi, H. Kawamura
{"title":"Optimal Waiting Period for Cholecystectomy after Percutaneous Transhepatic Biliary Drainage Based on Surgical Difficulty","authors":"K. Mino, K. Uemura, Takumu Fukasawa, Takuto Suzuki, Tomoya Saito, Chisato Shirakawa, T. Yoshida, T. Ohata, Y. Konishi, H. Kawamura","doi":"10.5833/jjgs.2020.0186","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose: There is no consensus on the optimal waiting period between percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) and cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. We evaluated the relationship of waiting period with surgical difficulty, and examined the optimal waiting period. Materials and Methods: Associations of surgical difficulty with waiting period and other factors were retrospectively evaluated in 85 patients who underwent cholecystectomy after PTGBD in our hospital. For endpoints that suggested involvement of the waiting period, cutoff values for the waiting period were set between 2 and 8 weeks, and the detection power was evaluated with ROC curves. Factors associated with the selected waiting periods were examined. Results: The waiting period was significantly longer in patients with automatic suture closure or reconstitution of the gallbladder neck, intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder, an intraoperative finding of mass formation in the gallbladder neck, and an operation time ≥120 min. An cutoff of a waiting period of 3 weeks was identified for the optimal predictive power of these four factors. Patients with a waiting period >3 weeks had more severe cholecystitis, more residual inflammation of the gallbladder, and more frequent mass formation in the gallbladder neck. Conclusion: Many cases of severe cholecystitis require a waiting period. Careful surgical manipulation and postoperative management are still required after this period because the surgical difficulty is likely to remain high.","PeriodicalId":35811,"journal":{"name":"Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Japanese Journal of Gastroenterological Surgery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5833/jjgs.2020.0186","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is no consensus on the optimal waiting period between percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage (PTGBD) and cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. We evaluated the relationship of waiting period with surgical difficulty, and examined the optimal waiting period. Materials and Methods: Associations of surgical difficulty with waiting period and other factors were retrospectively evaluated in 85 patients who underwent cholecystectomy after PTGBD in our hospital. For endpoints that suggested involvement of the waiting period, cutoff values for the waiting period were set between 2 and 8 weeks, and the detection power was evaluated with ROC curves. Factors associated with the selected waiting periods were examined. Results: The waiting period was significantly longer in patients with automatic suture closure or reconstitution of the gallbladder neck, intraoperative perforation of the gallbladder, an intraoperative finding of mass formation in the gallbladder neck, and an operation time ≥120 min. An cutoff of a waiting period of 3 weeks was identified for the optimal predictive power of these four factors. Patients with a waiting period >3 weeks had more severe cholecystitis, more residual inflammation of the gallbladder, and more frequent mass formation in the gallbladder neck. Conclusion: Many cases of severe cholecystitis require a waiting period. Careful surgical manipulation and postoperative management are still required after this period because the surgical difficulty is likely to remain high.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
基于手术难度的经皮肝胆管引流术后胆囊切除术的最佳等待期
目的:急性胆囊炎经皮肝穿刺胆囊引流术(PTGBD)和胆囊切除术的最佳等待期尚未达成一致。我们评估了等待期与手术难度的关系,并检验了最佳等待期。材料与方法:回顾性分析我院85例PTGBD后胆囊切除术患者的手术难度与等待期等因素的关系。对于提示涉及等待期的终点,等待期的截止值设置在2至8周之间,并用ROC曲线评估检测能力。研究了与所选等待期相关的因素。结果:胆囊颈自动缝合或重建、术中胆囊穿孔、术中发现胆囊颈肿块形成、手术时间≥120min的患者等待期明显延长。为这四个因素的最佳预测能力,确定了3周等待期的截止时间。等待期>3周的患者有更严重的胆囊炎、更多的胆囊残余炎症和更频繁的胆囊颈肿块形成。结论:许多严重胆囊炎需要等待一段时间。在这段时间之后,仍然需要仔细的手术操作和术后管理,因为手术难度可能仍然很高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
95
期刊最新文献
日本消化器外科学会認定施設における男女共同参画の取り組み・実情に関するアンケート調査 編集後記 A Case of Pancreatic Head Carcinoma with Stenosis at the Root of the Superior Mesenteric Artery That Was Safely Resected after Embolization of the Pancreatic Arcade ρ吻合により栄養改善が得られた胃全摘後blind pouch syndromeの1例 肝右葉背側病変に対する腹腔鏡下肝切除における術野確保の工夫
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1