Considering the constitutionality of South Africa’s anti-gang legislation in light of the principle of legality

IF 0.3 4区 社会学 Q3 LAW South African Journal on Human Rights Pub Date : 2020-07-02 DOI:10.1080/02587203.2020.1859338
Delano Cole Van der Linde
{"title":"Considering the constitutionality of South Africa’s anti-gang legislation in light of the principle of legality","authors":"Delano Cole Van der Linde","doi":"10.1080/02587203.2020.1859338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The essence of the principle of legality is to constrain governmental, legislative and judicial power, and protect citizens from the arbitrary exercise of these powers. This is especially true in the context of the drafting and interpretation of criminal law. Criminal laws in particular must be drafted in a reasonably clear fashion to provide citizens with fair warning of criminal sanction. The courts must also interpret these laws strictly, so that citizens are not punished for conduct that did not fall within the scope of either a common law or statutory crime. This article examines whether certain definitions employed in the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 do not offend the principle of legality as it employs dubiously wide definitions. Although widening the criminal net for, in particular, criminal gang activities, these definitions arguably do not provide fair warning to citizens to avoid criminal sanction and may also be at risk of overbroad judicial interpretation. The analysis will further take place in light of comparable foreign legislation and decisions.","PeriodicalId":44989,"journal":{"name":"South African Journal on Human Rights","volume":"36 1","pages":"221 - 241"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/02587203.2020.1859338","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"South African Journal on Human Rights","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02587203.2020.1859338","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract The essence of the principle of legality is to constrain governmental, legislative and judicial power, and protect citizens from the arbitrary exercise of these powers. This is especially true in the context of the drafting and interpretation of criminal law. Criminal laws in particular must be drafted in a reasonably clear fashion to provide citizens with fair warning of criminal sanction. The courts must also interpret these laws strictly, so that citizens are not punished for conduct that did not fall within the scope of either a common law or statutory crime. This article examines whether certain definitions employed in the Prevention of Organised Crime Act 121 of 1998 do not offend the principle of legality as it employs dubiously wide definitions. Although widening the criminal net for, in particular, criminal gang activities, these definitions arguably do not provide fair warning to citizens to avoid criminal sanction and may also be at risk of overbroad judicial interpretation. The analysis will further take place in light of comparable foreign legislation and decisions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
从合法性原则考虑南非反帮派立法的合宪性
合法性原则的本质是约束政府权力、立法权和司法权,保护公民不受这些权力的任意行使。在刑法的起草和解释方面尤其如此。特别是刑法必须以合理明确的方式起草,以便向公民提供刑事制裁的公平警告。法院还必须严格解释这些法律,以便公民不会因为既不属于普通法范围也不属于成文法范围的行为而受到惩罚。本文探讨了1998年《防止有组织犯罪法》中使用的某些定义是否违反了合法性原则,因为它使用了令人怀疑的广泛定义。虽然扩大了犯罪网络,特别是犯罪团伙活动,但这些定义可以说没有向公民提供公平的警告,以避免刑事制裁,也可能有司法解释过于宽泛的危险。将根据可比较的外国立法和决定进一步进行分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
77.80%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Consulting citizens: Addressing the deficits in participatory democracy Ubuntu, human rights and sustainable development: Lessons from the African Arbitration Academy’s Model Bilateral Investment Treaty Research handbook on economic, social and cultural rights Augmentative and alternative communication in the South African justice system: Potential and pitfalls The importance of litigating the right to access sufficient food: Equal Education v Minister of Basic Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1