Exploratory study of an ally training program for mental health support

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2023-08-08 DOI:10.1108/jpmh-02-2023-0020
Beatrice Meda Wendeln, Lindsay Sheehan
{"title":"Exploratory study of an ally training program for mental health support","authors":"Beatrice Meda Wendeln, Lindsay Sheehan","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-02-2023-0020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an online mental health ally program on several measurements of readiness to help and stigma reduction. Allyship is one way to support people with mental health challenges beyond traditional care services.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe efficacy of the program was evaluated in pre and postintervention surveys (n = 26) including measures of self-care, help-seeking intentions, peer-support self-efficacy, advocacy, knowledge of resources and stigma. A within-subject, repeated measures design was conducted analyzing changes at completion. Twenty-six participants who completed the program (either with or without lived experience of mental illness) were included in the study. A subgroup of participants (n = 11) who reported lived experiences of mental illness were assigned additional measures of internalized stigma, stigma stress, stigma resistance and self-esteem.\n\n\nFindings\nAnalysis of mean differences indicated a statistically significant change in scores pre and postcompletion. The program increased peer-support, help-seeking intentions and self-esteem, while reducing internalized stigma and stigma stress. Findings provide preliminary support for program effectiveness in training individuals to support others and themselves through mental health challenges.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nTrained allies might improve the lives of individuals with mental health challenges by reducing discrimination and improving social support. We discuss the implication of allies to complement the mental health system.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first exploratory study on the efficacy of an online ally training program for individuals with mental illness. The NoStigmas Ally Program is a novel and original development in ally training.\n","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-02-2023-0020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effects of an online mental health ally program on several measurements of readiness to help and stigma reduction. Allyship is one way to support people with mental health challenges beyond traditional care services. Design/methodology/approach The efficacy of the program was evaluated in pre and postintervention surveys (n = 26) including measures of self-care, help-seeking intentions, peer-support self-efficacy, advocacy, knowledge of resources and stigma. A within-subject, repeated measures design was conducted analyzing changes at completion. Twenty-six participants who completed the program (either with or without lived experience of mental illness) were included in the study. A subgroup of participants (n = 11) who reported lived experiences of mental illness were assigned additional measures of internalized stigma, stigma stress, stigma resistance and self-esteem. Findings Analysis of mean differences indicated a statistically significant change in scores pre and postcompletion. The program increased peer-support, help-seeking intentions and self-esteem, while reducing internalized stigma and stigma stress. Findings provide preliminary support for program effectiveness in training individuals to support others and themselves through mental health challenges. Research limitations/implications Trained allies might improve the lives of individuals with mental health challenges by reducing discrimination and improving social support. We discuss the implication of allies to complement the mental health system. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first exploratory study on the efficacy of an online ally training program for individuals with mental illness. The NoStigmas Ally Program is a novel and original development in ally training.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
心理健康支持联盟培训项目的探索性研究
目的:本研究的目的是评估在线心理健康联盟项目对帮助意愿和减少耻辱感的几个测量指标的影响。同盟关系是支持传统护理服务之外的精神卫生挑战患者的一种方式。设计/方法/方法通过干预前和干预后的调查(n = 26)来评估该计划的有效性,包括自我护理、寻求帮助的意图、同伴支持的自我效能、倡导、资源知识和耻辱的测量。进行了受试者内重复测量设计,分析完成时的变化。26名完成项目的参与者(有或没有精神疾病的生活经历)被纳入研究。一组报告有精神疾病生活经历的参与者(n = 11)被分配了额外的内化耻辱、耻辱压力、耻辱抵抗和自尊的测量。结果:对平均差异的分析表明,完成前后的得分有统计学上的显著变化。该项目增加了同伴支持、寻求帮助的意愿和自尊,同时减少了内化的耻辱和耻辱压力。研究结果为培训个人通过心理健康挑战支持他人和自己的项目有效性提供了初步支持。研究局限性/意义strain联盟可以通过减少歧视和改善社会支持来改善有精神健康挑战的个人的生活。我们讨论了盟友的含义,以补充精神卫生系统。原创性/价值据作者所知,这是第一个关于精神疾病患者在线盟友培训计划有效性的探索性研究。“无耻盟友计划”是盟友培训中一项新颖的、原创的发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Overcoming challenges of embedding child and youth mental health research in community NHS services Psychological wellbeing and avoidance strategies as moderators between excessive social media use and academic performance among Indian college students Pain and associated functional impairment in the Danish general population: the role of mental well-being Impact of nature on the mental health and well-being of the ICU survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Public mental health and wellbeing interventions delivered by allied health professionals (AHPs): mapping the evidence and identification of gaps. A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1