Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-CODAS-SORT for characterizing the challenges of circular public sector supply chains

IF 3.7 4区 管理学 Q2 OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE Operations Research Perspectives Pub Date : 2022-01-01 DOI:10.1016/j.orp.2022.100246
Joerabell Lourdes Aro , Egberto Selerio Jr. , Samantha Shane Evangelista , Fatima Maturan , Nadine May Atibing , Lanndon Ocampo
{"title":"Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-CODAS-SORT for characterizing the challenges of circular public sector supply chains","authors":"Joerabell Lourdes Aro ,&nbsp;Egberto Selerio Jr. ,&nbsp;Samantha Shane Evangelista ,&nbsp;Fatima Maturan ,&nbsp;Nadine May Atibing ,&nbsp;Lanndon Ocampo","doi":"10.1016/j.orp.2022.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The challenges of implementing circular supply chains (CSCs) are well documented, but their characterization in public sector supply chains is unavailable. Thus, this paper closes such a gap by viewing it as a multiple criteria sorting (MCS) problem. Following a systematic literature review of identifying CSC challenges, they are analytically mapped to public sector characteristics through a novel integration of Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS)-SORT (CODAS-SORT) methods under a Fermatean fuzzy environment. Unlike other comparable methods, the proposed Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-CODAS-SORT is a computationally efficient MCS tool that only requires minimal cognitive workload from expert decision-makers. The Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC generates the weights of domain characteristics, while the Fermatean fuzzy CODAS-SORT assigns the CSC challenges to predefined classes. Findings reveal that inadequate top management support, inadequate government policies, lack of interest in the concept of circularity, lack of incentives to adopt CSC practices, restrictive collection policies, inadequate knowledge on CSC, and size and complexity of supply chains are the most relevant CSC challenges in the public sector. These findings would contribute to the design of effective initiatives and resource allocation decisions in advancing the circularity of supply chains in the public sector. Various policy insights are proposed, along with some future research agenda.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":38055,"journal":{"name":"Operations Research Perspectives","volume":"9 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000197/pdfft?md5=324c3255673e60892cf6c915e91a0564&pid=1-s2.0-S2214716022000197-main.pdf","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Operations Research Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214716022000197","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

The challenges of implementing circular supply chains (CSCs) are well documented, but their characterization in public sector supply chains is unavailable. Thus, this paper closes such a gap by viewing it as a multiple criteria sorting (MCS) problem. Following a systematic literature review of identifying CSC challenges, they are analytically mapped to public sector characteristics through a novel integration of Criteria Importance Through Intercriteria Correlation (CRITIC) and Combinative Distance-based Assessment (CODAS)-SORT (CODAS-SORT) methods under a Fermatean fuzzy environment. Unlike other comparable methods, the proposed Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC-CODAS-SORT is a computationally efficient MCS tool that only requires minimal cognitive workload from expert decision-makers. The Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC generates the weights of domain characteristics, while the Fermatean fuzzy CODAS-SORT assigns the CSC challenges to predefined classes. Findings reveal that inadequate top management support, inadequate government policies, lack of interest in the concept of circularity, lack of incentives to adopt CSC practices, restrictive collection policies, inadequate knowledge on CSC, and size and complexity of supply chains are the most relevant CSC challenges in the public sector. These findings would contribute to the design of effective initiatives and resource allocation decisions in advancing the circularity of supply chains in the public sector. Various policy insights are proposed, along with some future research agenda.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
fermatan fuzzy critical - codas - sort用于描述循环公共部门供应链的挑战
实施循环供应链(CSCs)的挑战有很好的记录,但它们在公共部门供应链中的特征是不可用的。因此,本文通过将其视为多准则排序(MCS)问题来缩小这种差距。在对识别CSC挑战的系统文献综述之后,通过在Fermatean模糊环境下通过标准间相关性(critical)和基于距离的组合评估(CODAS)-SORT (CODAS-SORT)方法的新整合,将这些挑战分析映射到公共部门特征。与其他可比较的方法不同,所提出的Fermatean模糊critical - codas - sort是一种计算效率高的MCS工具,只需要专家决策者最小的认知工作量。Fermatean fuzzy CRITIC生成域特征权值,而Fermatean fuzzy CODAS-SORT将CSC挑战分配给预定义类。研究结果表明,高层管理支持不足、政府政策不充分、对循环概念缺乏兴趣、缺乏采用CSC实践的激励、限制性催收政策、对CSC的了解不足以及供应链的规模和复杂性是公共部门中最相关的CSC挑战。这些发现将有助于设计有效的举措和资源分配决策,以促进公共部门供应链的循环。提出了各种政策见解,以及一些未来的研究议程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Operations Research Perspectives
Operations Research Perspectives Mathematics-Statistics and Probability
CiteScore
6.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
36
审稿时长
27 days
期刊最新文献
Integrated order acceptance and inventory policy optimization in a multi-period, multi-product hybrid production system Distributional robustness based on Wasserstein-metric approach for humanitarian logistics problem under road disruptions A generalized behavioral-based goal programming approach for decision-making under imprecision δ-perturbation of bilevel optimization problems: An error bound analysis Competitive pricing and seed node selection in a two-echelon supply chain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1