Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Accounting Education Pub Date : 2021-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100730
Satoshi Sugahara , Andrea Cilloni
{"title":"Mediation effect of students’ perception of accounting on the relationship between game-based learning and learning approaches","authors":"Satoshi Sugahara ,&nbsp;Andrea Cilloni","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100730","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>This study explores the mediation effect of students’ perceptions toward accounting to enhance their adoption of the deep learning approach. We adopt game-based learning (GBL) using a self-developed LEGO® simulation game as the active learning material. Participants of this study comprised undergraduate students majoring in accounting from a northern university in Italy. This study contributes to the literature by providing several new insights. First, we present statistical evidence of a mediation effect of students’ perceptions toward accounting on their learning approach, although the course offers a short-time activity. Second, we did not confirm the significance of students’ strong image of conformity in accounting as a mediator in the relationship between GBL and a surface approach to learning. We interpret that students hold more favorable images of conformity to accounting than before taking the GBL course, possibly fostering them to engage with deep approach processes while adopting appropriate facilitation of active learning.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":35578,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting Education","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.jaccedu.2021.100730","citationCount":"8","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748575121000178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

Abstract

This study explores the mediation effect of students’ perceptions toward accounting to enhance their adoption of the deep learning approach. We adopt game-based learning (GBL) using a self-developed LEGO® simulation game as the active learning material. Participants of this study comprised undergraduate students majoring in accounting from a northern university in Italy. This study contributes to the literature by providing several new insights. First, we present statistical evidence of a mediation effect of students’ perceptions toward accounting on their learning approach, although the course offers a short-time activity. Second, we did not confirm the significance of students’ strong image of conformity in accounting as a mediator in the relationship between GBL and a surface approach to learning. We interpret that students hold more favorable images of conformity to accounting than before taking the GBL course, possibly fostering them to engage with deep approach processes while adopting appropriate facilitation of active learning.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
学生会计知觉对游戏学习与学习方式关系的中介作用
本研究探讨学生对会计的认知对其采用深度学习方法的中介作用。我们采用基于游戏的学习(GBL),使用自主开发的乐高®模拟游戏作为主动学习材料。本研究的研究对象为意大利北部一所大学会计学专业的本科生。这项研究通过提供一些新的见解对文献做出了贡献。首先,我们提出了统计证据,证明学生对会计的看法对他们的学习方法有中介作用,尽管课程提供了一个短时间的活动。其次,我们没有证实学生在会计中强烈的从从性形象作为GBL与表面学习方法之间关系的中介的重要性。我们解释说,与参加GBL课程之前相比,学生对会计的符合性持有更有利的形象,这可能促进他们参与深度方法过程,同时采取适当的主动学习促进。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Accounting Education
Journal of Accounting Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
27
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting Education (JAEd) is a refereed journal dedicated to promoting and publishing research on accounting education issues and to improving the quality of accounting education worldwide. The Journal provides a vehicle for making results of empirical studies available to educators and for exchanging ideas, instructional resources, and best practices that help improve accounting education. The Journal includes four sections: a Main Articles Section, a Teaching and Educational Notes Section, an Educational Case Section, and a Best Practices Section. Manuscripts published in the Main Articles Section generally present results of empirical studies, although non-empirical papers (such as policy-related or essay papers) are sometimes published in this section. Papers published in the Teaching and Educational Notes Section include short empirical pieces (e.g., replications) as well as instructional resources that are not properly categorized as cases, which are published in a separate Case Section. Note: as part of the Teaching Note accompany educational cases, authors must include implementation guidance (based on actual case usage) and evidence regarding the efficacy of the case vis-a-vis a listing of educational objectives associated with the case. To meet the efficacy requirement, authors must include direct assessment (e.g grades by case requirement/objective or pre-post tests). Although interesting and encouraged, student perceptions (surveys) are considered indirect assessment and do not meet the efficacy requirement. The case must have been used more than once in a course to avoid potential anomalies and to vet the case before submission. Authors may be asked to collect additional data, depending on course size/circumstances.
期刊最新文献
How a color-based teaching method has lifted grades for first-year accounting students Workbook design and controls: A framework Examining the contribution of diverse feedback perspectives during a work-integrated learning intervention Teaching accounting in the era of ChatGPT – The student perspective Key factors affecting faculty commitment toward accounting curriculum change: Differences between UAE and UK AACSB-accredited universities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1