Enterococci from breast-fed infants exert higher antibacterial effects than those from adults: A comparative study

Q1 Medicine Human Microbiome Journal Pub Date : 2020-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.humic.2020.100072
Maryam Rahmani , Fereshteh Saffari , Omid Aboubakri , Shahla Mansouri
{"title":"Enterococci from breast-fed infants exert higher antibacterial effects than those from adults: A comparative study","authors":"Maryam Rahmani ,&nbsp;Fereshteh Saffari ,&nbsp;Omid Aboubakri ,&nbsp;Shahla Mansouri","doi":"10.1016/j.humic.2020.100072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Enterococci are members of human gut microbiota which their colonization has been demonstrated even before birth. This indicates their importance in infant health. As this population is dynamic and varies with age, this study was designed to assess and compare the antibacterial effects of enterococci from breast-fed infants and those from adults. Fecal isolates of enterococci were isolated from infants and healthy adults and were identified to the species level by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Further, they were evaluated for their potential to exert antibacterial effect against ten standard bacterial strains using bilayer spot test. Of a total of eighty-nine recovered enterococcal isolates, <em>Enterococcus faecium</em> and <em>E. faecalis</em> were the most common species (98%) and showed inhibitory effects at least against one indicator strain. Comparison between isolates from two studied groups showed that isolates from neonates introduced significantly higher growth inhibitory effects against six indicator strains (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) and these effects were frequently attributable to <em>E. faecium</em> isolates. In addition, the highest growth inhibitory effect was observed against <em>Listeria monocytogenes</em>. Antimicrobial effects of enterococci in human microbiota change during time. The beneficial role of these organisms within the neonatal period suggests the potential of enterococci from breast-fed infants for probiotic application<strong>.</strong></p></div>","PeriodicalId":37790,"journal":{"name":"Human Microbiome Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/j.humic.2020.100072","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Human Microbiome Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2452231720300038","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Enterococci are members of human gut microbiota which their colonization has been demonstrated even before birth. This indicates their importance in infant health. As this population is dynamic and varies with age, this study was designed to assess and compare the antibacterial effects of enterococci from breast-fed infants and those from adults. Fecal isolates of enterococci were isolated from infants and healthy adults and were identified to the species level by phenotypic and genotypic methods. Further, they were evaluated for their potential to exert antibacterial effect against ten standard bacterial strains using bilayer spot test. Of a total of eighty-nine recovered enterococcal isolates, Enterococcus faecium and E. faecalis were the most common species (98%) and showed inhibitory effects at least against one indicator strain. Comparison between isolates from two studied groups showed that isolates from neonates introduced significantly higher growth inhibitory effects against six indicator strains (P < 0.05) and these effects were frequently attributable to E. faecium isolates. In addition, the highest growth inhibitory effect was observed against Listeria monocytogenes. Antimicrobial effects of enterococci in human microbiota change during time. The beneficial role of these organisms within the neonatal period suggests the potential of enterococci from breast-fed infants for probiotic application.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
来自母乳喂养婴儿的肠球菌比来自成人的肠球菌具有更高的抗菌作用:一项比较研究
肠球菌是人类肠道菌群的成员,其定植甚至在出生前就已被证明。这表明它们对婴儿健康的重要性。由于肠道菌群是动态的,且随年龄的变化而变化,本研究旨在评估和比较母乳喂养的婴儿和成人肠道球菌的抗菌效果。从婴儿和健康成人的粪便中分离出肠球菌,并通过表型和基因型方法对其进行了种水平的鉴定。采用双层斑点试验对10种标准菌株进行了抑菌潜力评价。在总共89株回收的肠球菌分离株中,粪肠球菌和粪肠球菌是最常见的菌株(98%),至少对一种指示菌株有抑制作用。两组分离株的比较表明,新生儿分离株对6种指示菌株的生长抑制作用明显更高(P <0.05),这些影响多为粪肠杆菌所致。此外,对单核增生李斯特菌的生长抑制作用最高。肠球菌在人体微生物群中的抗菌作用随时间而变化。这些微生物在新生儿期的有益作用表明,来自母乳喂养婴儿的肠球菌具有益生菌应用的潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Human Microbiome Journal
Human Microbiome Journal Medicine-Infectious Diseases
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The innumerable microbes living in and on our bodies are known to affect human wellbeing, but our knowledge of their role is still at the very early stages of understanding. Human Microbiome is a new open access journal dedicated to research on the impact of the microbiome on human health and disease. The journal will publish original research, reviews, comments, human microbe descriptions and genome, and letters. Topics covered will include: the repertoire of human-associated microbes, therapeutic intervention, pathophysiology, experimental models, physiological, geographical, and pathological changes, and technical reports; genomic, metabolomic, transcriptomic, and culturomic approaches are welcome.
期刊最新文献
The Human Gut Microbiota and Gastrointestinal Cancer: Current Status and Therapeutic Perspectives Modern Perspectives in Controlling Human Diseases through Probiotic Intervention Oral Microbiome: An Opening to Healthy Possibilities Microbiota-Gut-Brain Axis in Neurological Disorders Emerging Role of Gut Microbiota in Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1