A Functional Analysis of the Role of Deposits in the Traditional Banking Industry

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY Pub Date : 2023-07-25 DOI:10.1080/09538259.2023.2233870
Riccardo Zolea
{"title":"A Functional Analysis of the Role of Deposits in the Traditional Banking Industry","authors":"Riccardo Zolea","doi":"10.1080/09538259.2023.2233870","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper proposes a functional analysis of the input of the traditional banking sector in an endogenous money framework. Although banks create bank money, central bank money (or reserves) cannot be produced by banks, which require it as an input. Deposits are the cheapest source of central bank money already in the system, so it can be argued that deposits serve as inputs for the banking industry. Nevertheless, for individual banks it is necessary to draw some distinctions between deposits corresponding to liquidity injection and pure accounting entries that are generated by the creation of loans. Furthermore, the role of bank bonds is discussed, in the context of whether they function more as equity or as deposits. Unlike other industries, it is hypothesised that the functional role of bank bonds is very different from that of equity, and it is rather a different form of bank funding of liquidity, with some advantages and disadvantages compared to deposits. Finally, a brief comparison is pursed between this analysis of the traditional banking sector and the simpler study of other financial intermediaries.","PeriodicalId":46174,"journal":{"name":"REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","volume":"35 1","pages":"933 - 952"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REVIEW OF POLITICAL ECONOMY","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09538259.2023.2233870","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper proposes a functional analysis of the input of the traditional banking sector in an endogenous money framework. Although banks create bank money, central bank money (or reserves) cannot be produced by banks, which require it as an input. Deposits are the cheapest source of central bank money already in the system, so it can be argued that deposits serve as inputs for the banking industry. Nevertheless, for individual banks it is necessary to draw some distinctions between deposits corresponding to liquidity injection and pure accounting entries that are generated by the creation of loans. Furthermore, the role of bank bonds is discussed, in the context of whether they function more as equity or as deposits. Unlike other industries, it is hypothesised that the functional role of bank bonds is very different from that of equity, and it is rather a different form of bank funding of liquidity, with some advantages and disadvantages compared to deposits. Finally, a brief comparison is pursed between this analysis of the traditional banking sector and the simpler study of other financial intermediaries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
存款在传统银行业中的功能分析
摘要本文提出了内生货币框架下传统银行业投入的功能分析。虽然银行创造银行货币,但央行货币(或储备)不能由银行生产,银行需要它作为投入。存款是银行体系中最便宜的中央银行资金来源,因此可以说,存款是银行业的投入。然而,对于个别银行来说,有必要区分与注入流动性相对应的存款和由发放贷款产生的纯粹会计分录。此外,讨论了银行债券的作用,在背景下,他们是否作为股权或存款更多的功能。与其他行业不同,假设银行债券的功能作用与股权的功能作用非常不同,它是一种不同的银行流动性融资形式,与存款相比有一些优点和缺点。最后,对传统银行业的分析与其他金融中介机构的简单研究进行了简要的比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Review of Political Economy is a peer-reviewed journal welcoming constructive and critical contributions in all areas of political economy, including the Austrian, Behavioral Economics, Feminist Economics, Institutionalist, Marxian, Post Keynesian, and Sraffian traditions. The Review publishes both theoretical and empirical research, and is also open to submissions in methodology, economic history and the history of economic thought that cast light on issues of contemporary relevance in political economy. Comments on articles published in the Review are encouraged.
期刊最新文献
The Currency of Politics: The Political Theory of Money from Aristotle to Keynes The Monetary Theory of Production and the Supermultiplier: What Determines Savings? Revisiting the Pasinetti Index: Understanding Its Cyclical and Long-Term Features and Its Important Implications for Macroeconomic Policy Blurring Boundaries: An Analysis of the Digital Platforms-Military Nexus Public Investment as a Source of Capacity-Creating Autonomous Demand: Implications for Growth and Stability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1