Key factors affecting commercial actors in collaborative working within the UK construction industry

Sa’id N. Ahmed, C. Pasquire, E. Manu
{"title":"Key factors affecting commercial actors in collaborative working within the UK construction industry","authors":"Sa’id N. Ahmed, C. Pasquire, E. Manu","doi":"10.1108/jfmpc-01-2021-0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nExtensive research on the importance of collaborative working (CW) and aligning stakeholders’ interests in construction has been widely conducted. But often the practice of commercial actors during CW has often been overlooked, particularly within the UK setting, where scholars have lamented on the lack of industry-wide collaboration. This study aims to explore the factors affecting commercial actors in CW, specific to the UK construction industry.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThe research used a context-based approach to seek stakeholders’ perspectives on the key factors affecting commercial actors in CW within the UK. Semi-structured interviews with individuals (contractors, cost consultants, designers among others) from construction and infrastructure organisations were conducted, using multiple case study investigations. The collected data was analysed using a case study approach, and principles of inductive thematic analysis to identify the key factors.\n\n\nFindings\nFindings from the analysis identified “institutional” factors such as transactional cost economic influence, the prevailing construction model influence and professional related drivers. Key drivers within these factors include commercial background and training, custom and practice, misaligned interests in projects, clients’ perception of consultants, cost-driven environment, conventional procurement protocols and bureaucratic functions.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nIn conclusion, these factors continue to affect CW with undue influence on commercial actors in the UK, thus preventing performance improvement demanded by successive UK Government reports. The context-based approach applied in this study is expected to provide some insight in construction management research, especially from a commercial perspective in the UK, to gain an understanding of how these factors are manifesting.\n","PeriodicalId":45720,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jfmpc-01-2021-0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Purpose Extensive research on the importance of collaborative working (CW) and aligning stakeholders’ interests in construction has been widely conducted. But often the practice of commercial actors during CW has often been overlooked, particularly within the UK setting, where scholars have lamented on the lack of industry-wide collaboration. This study aims to explore the factors affecting commercial actors in CW, specific to the UK construction industry. Design/methodology/approach The research used a context-based approach to seek stakeholders’ perspectives on the key factors affecting commercial actors in CW within the UK. Semi-structured interviews with individuals (contractors, cost consultants, designers among others) from construction and infrastructure organisations were conducted, using multiple case study investigations. The collected data was analysed using a case study approach, and principles of inductive thematic analysis to identify the key factors. Findings Findings from the analysis identified “institutional” factors such as transactional cost economic influence, the prevailing construction model influence and professional related drivers. Key drivers within these factors include commercial background and training, custom and practice, misaligned interests in projects, clients’ perception of consultants, cost-driven environment, conventional procurement protocols and bureaucratic functions. Originality/value In conclusion, these factors continue to affect CW with undue influence on commercial actors in the UK, thus preventing performance improvement demanded by successive UK Government reports. The context-based approach applied in this study is expected to provide some insight in construction management research, especially from a commercial perspective in the UK, to gain an understanding of how these factors are manifesting.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
影响英国建筑业商业参与者合作的关键因素
目的对合作工作(CW)和协调利益相关者在建筑中的利益的重要性进行了广泛的研究。但商业演员在CW期间的做法往往被忽视,尤其是在英国,学者们对缺乏全行业合作表示遗憾。本研究旨在探讨影响CW商业行为者的因素,具体针对英国建筑业。设计/方法论/方法本研究采用基于情境的方法,就影响英国CW商业行为体的关键因素征求利益相关者的意见。通过多个案例研究调查,对建筑和基础设施组织的个人(承包商、成本顾问、设计师等)进行了半结构化访谈。使用案例研究方法和归纳专题分析原则对收集的数据进行分析,以确定关键因素。结果分析结果确定了“制度”因素,如交易成本经济影响、现行建筑模式影响和专业相关驱动因素。这些因素中的关键驱动因素包括商业背景和培训、习惯和实践、对项目的不一致兴趣、客户对顾问的看法、成本驱动的环境、传统的采购协议和官僚职能。创意/价值总之,这些因素继续影响CW,对英国的商业行为者产生了不应有的影响,从而阻碍了英国政府连续报告要求的绩效改进。本研究中应用的基于上下文的方法有望为建筑管理研究提供一些见解,特别是从英国的商业角度,以了解这些因素是如何表现的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
期刊最新文献
Managing supply chain disruptions in the construction industry: an institutional approach Assessing risk allocation preferences of partners in international construction joint venture projects in Ghana Impact of time-based delay on public-private partnership (PPP) construction project delivery: construction stakeholders’ perspective Drivers for the adoption of building information modelling (BIM) for post-construction management in the Nigerian AECO industry Risk assessment for 3D printing in construction projects
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1