Transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive functional task-oriented programme for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2021-06-29 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2021.1945805
C. Adeagbo, O. Olawale, C. Gbiri
{"title":"Transcranial direct current stimulation and repetitive functional task-oriented programme for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors","authors":"C. Adeagbo, O. Olawale, C. Gbiri","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2021.1945805","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Introduction Recovery of upper limb motor function remains a major challenge to stroke rehabilitation experts and stroke survivors alike. Stimulation of the motor cortex by noninvasive brain stimulators and therapy focused on repetitive functional activities can increase upper limb functioning after stroke. Hence, this study was designed to determine therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive functional task-oriented programme (RFTOP) for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors. Materials and Methods A single-blind randomized control trial involving 78 individuals with sub-acute and chronic stroke. They were randomized into three groups: Group 1: Anodal tDCS + RFTOP; Group 2: Cathodal tDCS + RFTOP; Group 3: RFTOP only. Participants had two sessions of therapy in a week for six weeks. Upper limb function was assessed using Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Box and Block Test (BBT). Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Baseline comparison of the groups showed no significant difference (FMA-UE: p = 0.237; BBT: p = 0.183). All groups showed statistical significant difference between baseline and post intervention in scores of FMA-UE (p ≤ 0.001) and BBT (p < 0.001). Mean difference comparison showed statistical significant difference among groups for FMA-UE hand domain (p = 0.009) and BBT (p = <0.001). Post hoc analysis showed the difference among the groups was between anodal against cathodal and anodal against control. Conclusion tDCS and RFTOP were efficacious for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors. Anodal tDCS showed better clinical improvement compared to Cathodal tDCS.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/10833196.2021.1945805","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2021.1945805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Recovery of upper limb motor function remains a major challenge to stroke rehabilitation experts and stroke survivors alike. Stimulation of the motor cortex by noninvasive brain stimulators and therapy focused on repetitive functional activities can increase upper limb functioning after stroke. Hence, this study was designed to determine therapeutic efficacy of transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) and repetitive functional task-oriented programme (RFTOP) for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors. Materials and Methods A single-blind randomized control trial involving 78 individuals with sub-acute and chronic stroke. They were randomized into three groups: Group 1: Anodal tDCS + RFTOP; Group 2: Cathodal tDCS + RFTOP; Group 3: RFTOP only. Participants had two sessions of therapy in a week for six weeks. Upper limb function was assessed using Fugl-Meyer Assessment Upper Extremity (FMA-UE) and Box and Block Test (BBT). Significance was set at p < 0.05. Results Baseline comparison of the groups showed no significant difference (FMA-UE: p = 0.237; BBT: p = 0.183). All groups showed statistical significant difference between baseline and post intervention in scores of FMA-UE (p ≤ 0.001) and BBT (p < 0.001). Mean difference comparison showed statistical significant difference among groups for FMA-UE hand domain (p = 0.009) and BBT (p = <0.001). Post hoc analysis showed the difference among the groups was between anodal against cathodal and anodal against control. Conclusion tDCS and RFTOP were efficacious for upper limb functional rehabilitation in stroke survivors. Anodal tDCS showed better clinical improvement compared to Cathodal tDCS.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
经颅直流电刺激和重复性功能任务导向方案对脑卒中幸存者上肢功能康复的影响
摘要引言上肢运动功能的恢复仍然是中风康复专家和中风幸存者面临的主要挑战。非侵入性脑刺激器对运动皮层的刺激和专注于重复功能活动的治疗可以提高中风后的上肢功能。因此,本研究旨在确定经颅直流电刺激(tDCS)和重复功能任务导向计划(RFTOP)对中风幸存者上肢功能康复的疗效。材料和方法一项涉及78名亚急性和慢性脑卒中患者的单盲随机对照试验。他们被随机分为三组:第1组:Anodal tDCS + RFTOP;第2组:天主教tDCS + RFTOP;第3组:仅限RFTOP。参与者在一周内接受了两次为期六周的治疗。上肢功能评估采用Fugl-Meyer评估上肢(FMA-UE)和盒块试验(BBT)。显著性设置为p < 结果两组基线比较无显著性差异(FMA-UE:p = 0.237;BBT:p = 0.183)。所有组在基线和干预后的FMA-UE评分上均显示出统计学上的显著差异(p ≤ 0.001)和BBT(p < 0.001)。平均差异比较显示各组之间在FMA-UE手域方面存在统计学显著差异(p = 0.009)和BBT(p=0.001)。事后分析显示,两组之间的差异在阳极与阴极和阳极与对照之间。结论tDCS和RFTOP对脑卒中患者上肢功能康复是有效的。与天主教tDCS相比,肛门tDCS表现出更好的临床改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1