Improving the intensity forecast of Tropical Cyclones in Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System

IF 3 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES Weather and Forecasting Pub Date : 2023-08-10 DOI:10.1175/waf-d-23-0041.1
Weiguo Wang, Jongil Han, Fanglin Yang, Johnathan Steffen, Bin Liu, Zhan Zhang, A. Mehra, V. Tallapragada
{"title":"Improving the intensity forecast of Tropical Cyclones in Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System","authors":"Weiguo Wang, Jongil Han, Fanglin Yang, Johnathan Steffen, Bin Liu, Zhan Zhang, A. Mehra, V. Tallapragada","doi":"10.1175/waf-d-23-0041.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nA modification to the mixing length formulation in a planetary boundary-layer (PBL) scheme is introduced to improve the intensity forecast of tropical cyclones (TCs) in a basin-scale Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) for the real-time experiment in 2021. The 2020 basin-scale HAFS with the physics suite of the NCEP operational global forecast system performs well in terms of the reduced root mean square (RMS) errors in track and intensity except for the mean intensity bias, compared with NCEP operational hurricane models. To address the large intensity bias issue, the vertical mixing length near the surface used in the PBL scheme is increased to follow the similarity theory, consistent with that used in the surface layer scheme. Test results show that the RMS error and bias in intensity are further reduced without the degradation of the track forecast. An idealized one-dimensional TC PBL model is used to understand the model response to the modification, indicating that the radial wind is strengthened to dynamically balance the enhanced downward momentum mixing. This is also exhibited in the case study of a three-dimensional HAFS simulation, with the improved vertical distribution of the simulated wind speed in the eyewall area. Given the improvement, the modification has been implemented in one of the configurations of the first version of operational HAFS at NCEP. Finally, the adjustment of the parameterization of diffusion and mixing in TC simulations is discussed.","PeriodicalId":49369,"journal":{"name":"Weather and Forecasting","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Weather and Forecasting","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1175/waf-d-23-0041.1","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

A modification to the mixing length formulation in a planetary boundary-layer (PBL) scheme is introduced to improve the intensity forecast of tropical cyclones (TCs) in a basin-scale Hurricane Analysis and Forecast System (HAFS) for the real-time experiment in 2021. The 2020 basin-scale HAFS with the physics suite of the NCEP operational global forecast system performs well in terms of the reduced root mean square (RMS) errors in track and intensity except for the mean intensity bias, compared with NCEP operational hurricane models. To address the large intensity bias issue, the vertical mixing length near the surface used in the PBL scheme is increased to follow the similarity theory, consistent with that used in the surface layer scheme. Test results show that the RMS error and bias in intensity are further reduced without the degradation of the track forecast. An idealized one-dimensional TC PBL model is used to understand the model response to the modification, indicating that the radial wind is strengthened to dynamically balance the enhanced downward momentum mixing. This is also exhibited in the case study of a three-dimensional HAFS simulation, with the improved vertical distribution of the simulated wind speed in the eyewall area. Given the improvement, the modification has been implemented in one of the configurations of the first version of operational HAFS at NCEP. Finally, the adjustment of the parameterization of diffusion and mixing in TC simulations is discussed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
飓风分析预报系统中热带气旋强度预报的改进
对行星边界层(PBL)方案中的混合长度公式进行了修改,以改进流域级飓风分析和预报系统(HAFS)中热带气旋(TC)的强度预报,用于2021年的实时实验。与NCEP操作飓风模型相比,具有NCEP操作全球预报系统物理套件的2020年流域尺度HAFS在路径和强度上的均方根(RMS)误差降低方面表现良好,但平均强度偏差除外。为了解决大强度偏差问题,增加了PBL方案中使用的表面附近的垂直混合长度,以遵循相似性理论,与表层方案中的一致。测试结果表明,在不降低轨道预测的情况下,RMS误差和强度偏差进一步减小。使用理想化的一维TC PBL模型来理解模型对修改的响应,表明径向风得到了增强,以动态平衡增强的向下动量混合。这也体现在三维HAFS模拟的案例研究中,改善了眼墙区域模拟风速的垂直分布。鉴于这一改进,该修改已在NCEP运行的第一版HAFS的一个配置中实施。最后,讨论了TC模拟中扩散和混合参数化的调整问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Weather and Forecasting
Weather and Forecasting 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
17.20%
发文量
131
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Weather and Forecasting (WAF) (ISSN: 0882-8156; eISSN: 1520-0434) publishes research that is relevant to operational forecasting. This includes papers on significant weather events, forecasting techniques, forecast verification, model parameterizations, data assimilation, model ensembles, statistical postprocessing techniques, the transfer of research results to the forecasting community, and the societal use and value of forecasts. The scope of WAF includes research relevant to forecast lead times ranging from short-term “nowcasts” through seasonal time scales out to approximately two years.
期刊最新文献
Impacts of sampling and storm-motion estimates on RUC/RAP-based discriminations of nontornadic and tornadic supercell environments Evaluating ensemble predictions of South Asian monsoon low pressure system genesis Evaluating machine learning-based probabilistic convective hazard forecasts using the HRRR: Quantifying hazard predictability and sensitivity to training choices AI-Driven Forecasting for Morning Fog Expansion (Sea of Clouds) The Meteorology of the August 2023 Maui Wildfire
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1