Four Tier Test Ecosystem: Diagnostic Test to Detect Misconception on Ecosystem Concepts

Lintang, P. K. Suprapto, R. Ardiansyah
{"title":"Four Tier Test Ecosystem: Diagnostic Test to Detect Misconception on Ecosystem Concepts","authors":"Lintang, P. K. Suprapto, R. Ardiansyah","doi":"10.22236/j.bes/515750","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: This study aims to develop and produce a diagnostic tool capable of detecting student misconceptions on the concept of ecosystems. Methods: This study used a research and development method with a modified 4D design (Define, Design, Develop and Disseminate) without disseminating or spreading. Data collection methods used in this research and development are observation, literature review, documentation, questionnaires, interviews and tests. Results: The results showed that the instruments developed were valid by validating 3 experts, namely material experts, evaluation and assessment experts, and linguists with an average percentage of each feasibility of 90% material expert judgment, 82% assessment expert assessment and evaluation. and 80% linguist assessment. Meanwhile, the instrument readability test showed a percentage of 63% in good category. The validity value of the instrument in general was 0.70 with the valid or high validity category, while the instrument reliability value was 0.82 with the very high category of reliability. The overall results of students' misconceptions on ecosystem material showed 23% of students experienced low-category miconceptions, 8% of students experienced no conceptual understanding, 17% of students experienced conceptual understanding, and 52% of students experienced partial understanding. Conclusion: Based on these results it can be said that the four-tier test instrument developed is feasible and can diagnose misconceptions in students","PeriodicalId":33216,"journal":{"name":"Bioeduscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Bioeduscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22236/j.bes/515750","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: This study aims to develop and produce a diagnostic tool capable of detecting student misconceptions on the concept of ecosystems. Methods: This study used a research and development method with a modified 4D design (Define, Design, Develop and Disseminate) without disseminating or spreading. Data collection methods used in this research and development are observation, literature review, documentation, questionnaires, interviews and tests. Results: The results showed that the instruments developed were valid by validating 3 experts, namely material experts, evaluation and assessment experts, and linguists with an average percentage of each feasibility of 90% material expert judgment, 82% assessment expert assessment and evaluation. and 80% linguist assessment. Meanwhile, the instrument readability test showed a percentage of 63% in good category. The validity value of the instrument in general was 0.70 with the valid or high validity category, while the instrument reliability value was 0.82 with the very high category of reliability. The overall results of students' misconceptions on ecosystem material showed 23% of students experienced low-category miconceptions, 8% of students experienced no conceptual understanding, 17% of students experienced conceptual understanding, and 52% of students experienced partial understanding. Conclusion: Based on these results it can be said that the four-tier test instrument developed is feasible and can diagnose misconceptions in students
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
四层测试生态系统:检测生态系统概念错误的诊断测试
背景:本研究旨在开发和生产一种诊断工具,能够检测学生对生态系统概念的误解。方法:本研究采用改良4D设计(定义、设计、开发和传播)的研发方法,不进行传播或传播。本研究和开发中使用的数据收集方法包括观察、文献综述、文献记录、问卷调查、访谈和测试。结果:通过对材料专家、评估评估专家和语言学家3位专家的验证,结果表明所开发的工具是有效的,每种可行性的平均百分比为90%的材料专家判断、82%的评估专家评估和评估。以及80%的语言学家评估。同时,仪器可读性测试显示,良好类别的百分比为63%。有效性或高有效性类别的仪器的有效性值通常为0.70,而极高可靠性类别的仪器可靠性值为0.82。学生对生态系统材料误解的总体结果显示,23%的学生经历了低类别的误解,8%的学生没有概念性理解,17%的学生经历概念性理解和52%的学生经历部分理解。结论:基于这些结果,可以说开发的四层测试仪是可行的,可以诊断学生的误解
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
8 weeks
期刊最新文献
Environmental Literacy of Indigenous Communities and Urban Communities On Lombok Island Analysis of Needs for the Development of Electronic Teaching Materials Based on Problem-Based Learning (PBL) Objek Wisata Pemandian Alam Bektiharjo Sebagai Sumber Pembelajaran Biologi Bacteria Isolation from Public Cemeteries Soil and Test for Resistance to Antibiotics Knowing the Role of the (TGT) Cooperative Learning Model on Student Learning Activeness
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1