An approach to classification and reporting lymph node cytopathology using Sydney system and evaluating the likelihood of malignancy

IF 2.1 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL BioMedicine-Taiwan Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.51248/.v43i02.2517
Ankita Shibu Robert, Crysle S Saldanha
{"title":"An approach to classification and reporting lymph node cytopathology using Sydney system and evaluating the likelihood of malignancy","authors":"Ankita Shibu Robert, Crysle S Saldanha","doi":"10.51248/.v43i02.2517","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and Aim: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), is a frequently employed diagnostic procedure in identifying lymph node pathology. This study aims to categorise cytological aspirates from lymph nodes according to the Sydney system and in addition determine the likelihood of cancer occurrence in the classified categories.\n \nMaterials and Methods: A cross-sectional study analysing lymph node cytology was performed retrospectively between January 2021 to December 2022, and the findings were classified into five groups from L1 to L5 as proposed by the Sydney System. By comparing the diagnoses with the corresponding histological diagnosis, statistical analysis was used to evaluate the probability of malignancy linked with each group.\n \nResults: Out of 279 fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) tests performed for lymphadenopathy, 39 cases were compared with histopathological results. The cases classified to the categories L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 were 11/279 (3.9%), 170/279 (60%), 2/279 (0.7%), and 93/279 (33%) accordingly. The likelihood of developing cancer was found to be 33.33%, 8.8%, 56.4%, 83.33%, and 94.74% for each group.\n \nConclusion: To achieve uniformity and repeatability in cytopathological diagnosis, the recommended Sydney method of lymph node cytology reporting and classification can be effective.","PeriodicalId":51650,"journal":{"name":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BioMedicine-Taiwan","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51248/.v43i02.2517","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and Aim: Fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC), is a frequently employed diagnostic procedure in identifying lymph node pathology. This study aims to categorise cytological aspirates from lymph nodes according to the Sydney system and in addition determine the likelihood of cancer occurrence in the classified categories.   Materials and Methods: A cross-sectional study analysing lymph node cytology was performed retrospectively between January 2021 to December 2022, and the findings were classified into five groups from L1 to L5 as proposed by the Sydney System. By comparing the diagnoses with the corresponding histological diagnosis, statistical analysis was used to evaluate the probability of malignancy linked with each group.   Results: Out of 279 fine needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) tests performed for lymphadenopathy, 39 cases were compared with histopathological results. The cases classified to the categories L1, L2, L3, L4, and L5 were 11/279 (3.9%), 170/279 (60%), 2/279 (0.7%), and 93/279 (33%) accordingly. The likelihood of developing cancer was found to be 33.33%, 8.8%, 56.4%, 83.33%, and 94.74% for each group.   Conclusion: To achieve uniformity and repeatability in cytopathological diagnosis, the recommended Sydney method of lymph node cytology reporting and classification can be effective.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
一种使用Sydney系统对淋巴结细胞病理学进行分类和报告并评估恶性肿瘤可能性的方法
简介与目的:细针穿刺细胞学检查(FNAC)是一种常用的淋巴结病理诊断方法。本研究旨在根据悉尼系统对淋巴结的细胞学抽吸物进行分类,并确定分类类别中癌症发生的可能性。材料和方法:回顾性分析了2021年1月至2022年12月期间淋巴结细胞学的横断面研究,并根据悉尼系统的建议将结果分为L1至L5五组。通过将诊断结果与相应的组织学诊断结果进行比较,采用统计学方法分析各组患者发生恶性肿瘤的可能性。结果:279例淋巴结病细针吸细胞学(FNAC)检查中,39例与组织病理学结果进行了比较。L1、L2、L3、L4、L5分型分别为11/279(3.9%)、170/279(60%)、2/279(0.7%)、93/279(33%)。患癌的可能性分别为33.33%、8.8%、56.4%、83.33%、94.74%。结论:为达到细胞病理学诊断的一致性和可重复性,推荐的淋巴结细胞学报告和分类的Sydney方法是有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BioMedicine-Taiwan
BioMedicine-Taiwan MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
21
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Integrating natural product research laboratory with artificial intelligence: Advancements and breakthroughs in traditional medicine. Juxtaposition of bone age and sexual maturity rating of the Taiwanese population. Machine learning-guided differential gene expression analysis identifies a highly-connected seven-gene cluster in triple-negative breast cancer. Advanced whole transcriptome sequencing and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML) in imiquimod-induced psoriasis-like inflammation of human keratinocytes. Application of machine learning to identify risk factors for outpatient opioid prescriptions following spine surgery.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1