Which comorbidities matter most in patients with multiple rib fractures? An analysis of the national inpatient sample

C. Towe, Avanti Badrinathan, V. Ho, Katelynn C. Bachman, S. Worrell, M. Moorman, P. Linden, F. Pieracci
{"title":"Which comorbidities matter most in patients with multiple rib fractures? An analysis of the national inpatient sample","authors":"C. Towe, Avanti Badrinathan, V. Ho, Katelynn C. Bachman, S. Worrell, M. Moorman, P. Linden, F. Pieracci","doi":"10.4103/jctt.jctt_14_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Increased age and number of rib fractures are known to increase the risk of mortality. The impact of comorbidities on the outcomes of patients with rib fractures has not previously been described. We hypothesized that specific medical comorbidities are associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality following rib fracture. Methods: Patients with multiple rib fractures or flail chest were identified in the National Inpatient Sample by ICD-10 code from the 4th quarter of 2015 through 2016. Comorbidities were categorized into Elixhauser comorbidity groups, and injury severity was estimated using the Injury Severity Score (ISS). The composite adverse outcome was defined as death, pneumonia, tracheostomy, or discharge to a short-term acute care facility. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with covariates chosen through backward selection from the univariate model to determine the relationship of outcomes to demographic variables and comorbidities with alpha set to 0.001. Results: Totally 26,289 patients met inclusion criteria. Composite adverse outcomes occurred in 5,132 (19.5%) patients. Profound ISS (OR 6.013), severe ISS (odds ratio [OR] 2.569), fluid and electrolyte disorder (OR 2.471), and paralysis (OR 2.372) were most associated with adverse outcomes. Within causes of injury, motor vehicle was associated with increased risk of adverse outcome (OR 1.322). Flail chest was also independently associated with adverse outcome (OR 1.816). Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality following rib fracture occurred in approximately one-fifth of patients, especially those with high ISS or associated medical comorbidities. This data can be used for risk stratification and identification of high-risk patients for escalation of care.","PeriodicalId":92962,"journal":{"name":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","volume":"6 1","pages":"22 - 27"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The journal of cardiothoracic trauma","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jctt.jctt_14_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background: Increased age and number of rib fractures are known to increase the risk of mortality. The impact of comorbidities on the outcomes of patients with rib fractures has not previously been described. We hypothesized that specific medical comorbidities are associated with increased risk of morbidity and mortality following rib fracture. Methods: Patients with multiple rib fractures or flail chest were identified in the National Inpatient Sample by ICD-10 code from the 4th quarter of 2015 through 2016. Comorbidities were categorized into Elixhauser comorbidity groups, and injury severity was estimated using the Injury Severity Score (ISS). The composite adverse outcome was defined as death, pneumonia, tracheostomy, or discharge to a short-term acute care facility. Multivariable logistic regression was performed with covariates chosen through backward selection from the univariate model to determine the relationship of outcomes to demographic variables and comorbidities with alpha set to 0.001. Results: Totally 26,289 patients met inclusion criteria. Composite adverse outcomes occurred in 5,132 (19.5%) patients. Profound ISS (OR 6.013), severe ISS (odds ratio [OR] 2.569), fluid and electrolyte disorder (OR 2.471), and paralysis (OR 2.372) were most associated with adverse outcomes. Within causes of injury, motor vehicle was associated with increased risk of adverse outcome (OR 1.322). Flail chest was also independently associated with adverse outcome (OR 1.816). Conclusion: Morbidity and mortality following rib fracture occurred in approximately one-fifth of patients, especially those with high ISS or associated medical comorbidities. This data can be used for risk stratification and identification of high-risk patients for escalation of care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
多发性肋骨骨折患者中哪些合并症最重要?全国住院病人样本分析
背景:众所周知,年龄和肋骨骨折数量的增加会增加死亡风险。合并症对肋骨骨折患者预后的影响以前没有描述过。我们假设特定的医学合并症与肋骨骨折后发病率和死亡率的增加有关。方法:从2015年第4季度到2016年,通过ICD-10代码在全国住院患者样本中确定多发性肋骨骨折或连枷胸患者。将合并症分为Elixhauser合并症组,并使用损伤严重程度评分(ISS)估计损伤严重程度。复合不良反应被定义为死亡、肺炎、气管造口术或出院至短期急性护理机构。通过从单变量模型中向后选择协变量进行多变量逻辑回归,以确定结果与人口统计学变量和合并症的关系,α设置为0.001。结果:26289例患者符合入选标准。5132例(19.5%)患者出现复合不良反应。深度ISS(OR 6.013)、严重ISS(比值比[OR]2.569)、液体和电解质紊乱(OR 2.471)以及瘫痪(OR 2.372)与不良结果最相关。在损伤原因中,机动车辆与不良后果的风险增加有关(OR 1.322)。Flail胸脯也与不良后果独立相关(OR 1.816)。结论:大约五分之一的患者发生肋骨骨折后的发病率和死亡率,尤其是那些ISS高或有相关医疗合并症的患者。这些数据可用于风险分层和高危患者的识别,以提高护理水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimal invasive approach for rib fractures: Feasibility and safety in a single-center experience Is flail chest correctly defined: A new definition is suggested Factors associated with early complications of surgical management due to penetrating laryngotracheal trauma in Colombia Posttraumatic pulmonary abscess Postoperative outcomes following surgical stabilization of rib fractures stratified by 5-factor modified frailty index
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1