Post-training urinary titin fragment concentration increases in athletes with previous muscle strain injury: a pilot study in soccer players

Tomonori Kawai, Koichi Takamoto, Itsumu Bito
{"title":"Post-training urinary titin fragment concentration increases in athletes with previous muscle strain injury: a pilot study in soccer players","authors":"Tomonori Kawai, Koichi Takamoto, Itsumu Bito","doi":"10.7600/jpfsm.10.263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Urinary titin fragment concentration has been established as a noninvasive bio-marker of muscle protein degradation and muscle damage after exercise. We hypothesized that concerning the microdamage in the chronic phase of muscle strain injury, muscle damage is more likely to occur after exposure to training workload. We aimed to evaluate the urinary titin fragment concentration in professional soccer players who previously had muscle strain injuries (injured vs uninjured group: mean ± SEM age [years], 26.25 ± 1.4 vs 23.75 ± 1.01; playing years, 14.375 ± 1.17 vs 12.25 ± 0.24; height [cm], 173.63 ± 1.98 vs 176.38 ± 1.0; weight [kg], 69.63 ± 2.05 vs 72.38 ± 1.87; mean body mass index [kg/m 2 ], 23.0 ± 0.32 vs 23.25 ± 1.39). The urine titin N-terminal fragments of eight professional soccer players with a previous muscle strain and eight uninjured players were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and 12 h after general team training. The urinary titin fragment values before and after training and the change in the titin fragment-to-creatinine fragment ratio were compared between the groups. The initial urinary titin fragment value did not significantly differ between the injured (from 18,457.96 ± 3,615.54 to 115,480.29 ± 26,462.36) and uninjured groups (from 23,119.47 ± 8,107.72 to 46,206.32 ± 9,833.77); however, the urine titin fragment value and change in the changes in urinary titin fragment ratio from before to after training were higher in the injured group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05). These findings may help guide the future management of athletes with previous muscle strain injuries. Urine titin fragment values could be used to evaluate athletes with previous muscle injury.","PeriodicalId":55847,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Physical Fitness and Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7600/jpfsm.10.263","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Urinary titin fragment concentration has been established as a noninvasive bio-marker of muscle protein degradation and muscle damage after exercise. We hypothesized that concerning the microdamage in the chronic phase of muscle strain injury, muscle damage is more likely to occur after exposure to training workload. We aimed to evaluate the urinary titin fragment concentration in professional soccer players who previously had muscle strain injuries (injured vs uninjured group: mean ± SEM age [years], 26.25 ± 1.4 vs 23.75 ± 1.01; playing years, 14.375 ± 1.17 vs 12.25 ± 0.24; height [cm], 173.63 ± 1.98 vs 176.38 ± 1.0; weight [kg], 69.63 ± 2.05 vs 72.38 ± 1.87; mean body mass index [kg/m 2 ], 23.0 ± 0.32 vs 23.25 ± 1.39). The urine titin N-terminal fragments of eight professional soccer players with a previous muscle strain and eight uninjured players were measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay before and 12 h after general team training. The urinary titin fragment values before and after training and the change in the titin fragment-to-creatinine fragment ratio were compared between the groups. The initial urinary titin fragment value did not significantly differ between the injured (from 18,457.96 ± 3,615.54 to 115,480.29 ± 26,462.36) and uninjured groups (from 23,119.47 ± 8,107.72 to 46,206.32 ± 9,833.77); however, the urine titin fragment value and change in the changes in urinary titin fragment ratio from before to after training were higher in the injured group (Wilcoxon rank-sum test, p < 0.05). These findings may help guide the future management of athletes with previous muscle strain injuries. Urine titin fragment values could be used to evaluate athletes with previous muscle injury.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
训练后尿titin片段浓度在先前肌肉拉伤的运动员中增加:一项对足球运动员的初步研究
尿中titin片段浓度已被确定为运动后肌肉蛋白降解和肌肉损伤的非侵入性生物标志物。我们假设,关于肌肉劳损慢性期的微损伤,暴露于训练负荷后更有可能发生肌肉损伤。我们旨在评估曾有肌肉拉伤的职业足球运动员(受伤组与未受伤组:平均±SEM年龄[年],26.25±1.4 vs 23.75±1.01;比赛年龄,14.375±1.17 vs 12.25±0.24;身高[cm],173.63±1.98 vs 176.38±1.0;体重[kg],69.63±2.05 vs 72.38±1.87;平均体重指数[kg/m2]分别为23.0±0.32vs23.25±1.39)。采用酶联免疫吸附法测定了8名有肌肉拉伤史的职业足球运动员和8名未受伤运动员在常规团队训练前和训练后12h的尿titin N-末端片段。比较两组训练前后的尿titin片段值以及titin片段与肌酸酐片段比率的变化。损伤组(18457.96±3615.54至115480.29±26462.36)和未损伤组(23119.47±8107.72至46206.32±9833.77)的初始尿中titin片段值无显著差异;但损伤组训练前后尿中titin片段值和尿中titin-片段比值的变化均较高(Wilcoxon秩和检验,p<0.05),这些发现可能有助于指导既往肌肉劳损运动员的治疗。尿titin片段值可用于评估有肌肉损伤史的运动员。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
37
审稿时长
18 weeks
期刊最新文献
Effects of stimulation conditions and subcutaneous tissue properties on acupressure-induced changes in blood circulation of human tendons Investigation of effective standing posture for increasing activity of pelvic floor muscles: a cross-sectional study Short-term strength adaptation in isometric training to volitional failure depends on initial specific tension in elbow flexors <sup>13</sup>C-glucose breath test quantifies differences in glucose metabolism between endurance and non-athletes Nutrition-related considerations for health and performance in female basketball players: a narrative review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1