Winter is coming: age and early psychological concomitants of the Covid-19 pandemic in England

IF 1.6 Q3 PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH Journal of Public Mental Health Pub Date : 2020-07-27 DOI:10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0062
J. Carson, J. Prescott, Rosie Allen, Sandie McHugh
{"title":"Winter is coming: age and early psychological concomitants of the Covid-19 pandemic in England","authors":"J. Carson, J. Prescott, Rosie Allen, Sandie McHugh","doi":"10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to demonstrate early psychological concomitants of the Covid-19 pandemic in England on a sample of younger and older people.,A cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire (n = 1608) was conducted on the Prolific website. Participants completed the PERMA Scale (Flourishing), the four Office of National Statistics (ONS4) Well-being Questions, the Clinical Outcomes Measure in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) and the short University of California Los Angeles Brief Loneliness Scale.,Data were gathered on March 18, 2020, near the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. This study looks at the effects of the developing pandemic on younger participants (18 to 25 years, n = 391) and older participants (60 to 80 years, n = 104). Flourishing levels for older participants were significantly higher (M = 107.96) than for younger participants (M = 97.80). Younger participants scored significantly higher on the ONS4 for anxiety and lower than the older participants for happiness, life satisfaction and having a worthwhile life. Levels of psychological distress (CORE-10) were also significantly lower for older participants (M = 9.06) than for younger participants (M = 14.61). Finally, younger participants scored significantly higher on the Brief UCLA Loneliness Scale (M = 6.05) than older participants (M = 4.64).,From these findings, the Covid-19 pandemic was having a significantly greater effect on younger people in England, less than one week before the UK went into “lockdown”. Scores for both the Younger and Older groups on all the study measures were worse than normative comparisons. The study had no specific measure of Covid-19 anxiety, but nor was one available at the time of the survey.,This study suggests that younger people (18 to 25) may be a more vulnerable group during the Covid-19 pandemic than many may have realized.,As a recent British Psychological Society report concluded, there is a lot of untapped wisdom amongst older groups in society.,This is one of the earliest studies to look at psychological distress before England went into “lockdown.”","PeriodicalId":45601,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Mental Health","volume":"19 1","pages":"221-230"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0062","citationCount":"20","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jpmh-06-2020-0062","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 20

Abstract

This paper aims to demonstrate early psychological concomitants of the Covid-19 pandemic in England on a sample of younger and older people.,A cross-sectional quantitative questionnaire (n = 1608) was conducted on the Prolific website. Participants completed the PERMA Scale (Flourishing), the four Office of National Statistics (ONS4) Well-being Questions, the Clinical Outcomes Measure in Routine Evaluation (CORE-10) and the short University of California Los Angeles Brief Loneliness Scale.,Data were gathered on March 18, 2020, near the start of the Covid-19 pandemic. This study looks at the effects of the developing pandemic on younger participants (18 to 25 years, n = 391) and older participants (60 to 80 years, n = 104). Flourishing levels for older participants were significantly higher (M = 107.96) than for younger participants (M = 97.80). Younger participants scored significantly higher on the ONS4 for anxiety and lower than the older participants for happiness, life satisfaction and having a worthwhile life. Levels of psychological distress (CORE-10) were also significantly lower for older participants (M = 9.06) than for younger participants (M = 14.61). Finally, younger participants scored significantly higher on the Brief UCLA Loneliness Scale (M = 6.05) than older participants (M = 4.64).,From these findings, the Covid-19 pandemic was having a significantly greater effect on younger people in England, less than one week before the UK went into “lockdown”. Scores for both the Younger and Older groups on all the study measures were worse than normative comparisons. The study had no specific measure of Covid-19 anxiety, but nor was one available at the time of the survey.,This study suggests that younger people (18 to 25) may be a more vulnerable group during the Covid-19 pandemic than many may have realized.,As a recent British Psychological Society report concluded, there is a lot of untapped wisdom amongst older groups in society.,This is one of the earliest studies to look at psychological distress before England went into “lockdown.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
冬天来了:英格兰Covid-19大流行的年龄和早期心理伴随因素
本文旨在以年轻人和老年人为样本,展示英国Covid-19大流行的早期心理伴随症状。在多产网站上进行横断面定量问卷调查(n = 1608)。参与者完成了PERMA量表(繁荣)、四个国家统计局(ONS4)幸福感问题、常规评估临床结果测量(CORE-10)和简短的加州大学洛杉矶分校简短孤独量表。数据收集于2020年3月18日,即Covid-19大流行开始前后。这项研究着眼于发展中的流行病对年轻参与者(18至25岁,n = 391)和老年参与者(60至80岁,n = 104)的影响。老年参与者的繁荣水平(M = 107.96)显著高于年轻参与者(M = 97.80)。在ONS4测试中,年轻参与者在焦虑方面的得分明显高于年长参与者,而在幸福、生活满意度和有价值的生活方面的得分则低于年长参与者。老年参与者(M = 9.06)的心理困扰水平(CORE-10)也显著低于年轻参与者(M = 14.61)。最后,年轻参与者在加州大学洛杉矶分校简短孤独量表(M = 6.05)上的得分明显高于年长参与者(M = 4.64)。从这些发现来看,在英国进入“封锁”前不到一周,新冠肺炎大流行对英格兰年轻人的影响要大得多。年轻人和老年人在所有研究指标上的得分都比标准比较差。该研究没有对Covid-19焦虑的具体衡量标准,但在调查时也没有。这项研究表明,在Covid-19大流行期间,年轻人(18至25岁)可能比许多人意识到的更脆弱。正如英国心理学会最近的一份报告所总结的那样,社会上的老年人中有很多尚未开发的智慧。这是在英国进入“封锁”之前最早研究心理困扰的研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Mental Health
Journal of Public Mental Health PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
7.10%
发文量
32
期刊最新文献
Overcoming challenges of embedding child and youth mental health research in community NHS services Psychological wellbeing and avoidance strategies as moderators between excessive social media use and academic performance among Indian college students Pain and associated functional impairment in the Danish general population: the role of mental well-being Impact of nature on the mental health and well-being of the ICU survivors: an interpretative phenomenological analysis Public mental health and wellbeing interventions delivered by allied health professionals (AHPs): mapping the evidence and identification of gaps. A systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1