Inclusion of IMF in Eurozone Crisis Management: Legitimacy Through External Expertise and Internal Depoliticisation

IF 1.7 Q2 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Global Society Pub Date : 2023-03-05 DOI:10.1080/13600826.2023.2183110
Laura Nordström, T. Teivainen
{"title":"Inclusion of IMF in Eurozone Crisis Management: Legitimacy Through External Expertise and Internal Depoliticisation","authors":"Laura Nordström, T. Teivainen","doi":"10.1080/13600826.2023.2183110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT A new technocratic knowledge regime emerged in Europe in 2010. Known as the Troika, it included the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the IMF. The Greek Stand-By Arrangement was the IMF’s first Eurozone financial assistance involvement, controversial for both the EU and the IMF. We trace how the IMF entered the process, focusing on why EU institutions involved it. We used official documents, statements, and a unique set of 129 interviews with IMF and EU decision-makers and Member State officials. We argue that the EU sought the IMF’s expertise in loan and conditionality negotiation, public image credibility, perceived guarantee for austerity, and depoliticisation. They were internally motivated by lack of confidence in the European Commission among EU Member States. Legitimacy was sought externally through the IMF’s expertise. The IMF continued its previous depoliticising role, a crucial strategy in crisis management, now in a novel multilevel context.","PeriodicalId":46197,"journal":{"name":"Global Society","volume":"37 1","pages":"485 - 505"},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/13600826.2023.2183110","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT A new technocratic knowledge regime emerged in Europe in 2010. Known as the Troika, it included the European Commission, the European Central Bank, and the IMF. The Greek Stand-By Arrangement was the IMF’s first Eurozone financial assistance involvement, controversial for both the EU and the IMF. We trace how the IMF entered the process, focusing on why EU institutions involved it. We used official documents, statements, and a unique set of 129 interviews with IMF and EU decision-makers and Member State officials. We argue that the EU sought the IMF’s expertise in loan and conditionality negotiation, public image credibility, perceived guarantee for austerity, and depoliticisation. They were internally motivated by lack of confidence in the European Commission among EU Member States. Legitimacy was sought externally through the IMF’s expertise. The IMF continued its previous depoliticising role, a crucial strategy in crisis management, now in a novel multilevel context.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
国际货币基金组织参与欧元区危机管理:通过外部专业知识和内部去政治化实现合法性
摘要2010年,欧洲出现了一个新的技术官僚知识体系。它被称为“三驾马车”,包括欧盟委员会、欧洲央行和国际货币基金组织。希腊待命安排是国际货币基金组织首次参与欧元区金融援助,对欧盟和国际货币基金会都有争议。我们追踪了国际货币基金组织是如何进入这一进程的,重点是欧盟机构为什么参与其中。我们使用了官方文件、声明,以及对国际货币基金和欧盟决策者以及成员国官员的129次独特采访。我们认为,欧盟寻求国际货币基金组织在贷款和条件谈判、公众形象可信度、紧缩保障和非政治化方面的专业知识。他们的内部动机是欧盟成员国对欧盟委员会缺乏信心。合法性是通过国际货币基金组织的专业知识从外部寻求的。国际货币基金组织继续其以前的非政治化作用,这是危机管理中的一项关键战略,现在处于一个新的多层次背景下。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Global Society
Global Society INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
6.20%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Global Society covers the new agenda in global and international relations and encourages innovative approaches to the study of global and international issues from a range of disciplines. It promotes the analysis of transactions at multiple levels, and in particular, the way in which these transactions blur the distinction between the sub-national, national, transnational, international and global levels. An ever integrating global society raises a number of issues for global and international relations which do not fit comfortably within established "Paradigms" Among these are the international and global consequences of nationalism and struggles for identity, migration, racism, religious fundamentalism, terrorism and criminal activities.
期刊最新文献
Passivity as Resistance: Counter-Conduct in Japan and Cambodia Counter-Conducts: A Foucauldian Analytics of Popup Civic Actions in Mexico Authoritarianism, Governmentality and the COVID-19 Response Re-thinking Global Governance as Fuzzy: Multi-Scalar Boundaries of Responsibility in the Arctic Multilateralism at War: Russia’s Invasion of Ukraine, the G20 and World Order
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1