Irigaray and Plato – Unlikely Bedfellows

IF 1.1 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY Pub Date : 2020-07-28 DOI:10.1080/00071773.2020.1796514
Mahon O’Brien
{"title":"Irigaray and Plato – Unlikely Bedfellows","authors":"Mahon O’Brien","doi":"10.1080/00071773.2020.1796514","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Luce Irigaray has devoted considerable energy to wrestling with some key figures in twentieth-century phenomenology. Since the topic for this special issue is the relationship between phenomenology and ancient philosophy, I plan in the following to look at Irigaray’s reading of Plato, given the centrality of carnality, sexuation and embodiment, not just to her own project, but the manner in which she invokes the same notions as part of her critique of Plato along with a number of twentieth-century phenomenologists.","PeriodicalId":44348,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","volume":"52 1","pages":"169 - 182"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/00071773.2020.1796514","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF THE BRITISH SOCIETY FOR PHENOMENOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00071773.2020.1796514","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

ABSTRACT Luce Irigaray has devoted considerable energy to wrestling with some key figures in twentieth-century phenomenology. Since the topic for this special issue is the relationship between phenomenology and ancient philosophy, I plan in the following to look at Irigaray’s reading of Plato, given the centrality of carnality, sexuation and embodiment, not just to her own project, but the manner in which she invokes the same notions as part of her critique of Plato along with a number of twentieth-century phenomenologists.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
伊里加雷和柏拉图——不可能的同床共枕
卢斯·伊里加雷花费了大量的精力与20世纪现象学中的一些关键人物进行斗争。由于本期专题的主题是现象学和古代哲学之间的关系,我计划在接下来看看Irigaray对柏拉图的解读,考虑到肉体,性和化身的中心地位,不仅是她自己的项目,而且是她引用相同概念的方式,作为她对柏拉图的批评的一部分,以及许多20世纪的现象学家。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
25
期刊最新文献
Husserl’s Notion of Solitary Speech Reconsidered: In Conversation with Vygotsky What Makes Natural Language “Natural”? A Phenomenological Proposal Infinity, Ideality, Transcendentality: The Idea in the Kantian Sense in Husserl and Derrida Sartre on Action: Decentring the Will Ontologically Interactive Painting: On Susan Rothenberg’s Three Heads
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1