Evaluating Collaborative Management within the National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries of Bangladesh

Q1 Environmental Science Parks Pub Date : 2018-05-31 DOI:10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-1MSU.EN
S. Uddin, J. Parr
{"title":"Evaluating Collaborative Management within the National Parks and Wildlife Sanctuaries of Bangladesh","authors":"S. Uddin, J. Parr","doi":"10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-1MSU.EN","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The protected area system of Bangladesh in March 2017 comprised 17 national parks covering 45,740 hectares and 21 wildlife sanctuaries covering 394,053 hectares. The Government of Bangladesh introduced collaborative management in these reserves in three successive, expanding phases undertaken between 2003 up until the present time. During this period, the successive programmes introduced an elaborate collaborative management system. This paper evaluates this collaborative management system as well as the protected area management arrangements being promoted, comprising: (i) the Co-management Council, (ii) the Co-management Committee, (iii) the People’s Forum, and (iv) sub-village institutional bodies including the Community Patrol Groups and the Forest User Groups (or the Village Conservation Forums). It assesses the management interventions and the effectiveness of the collaborative management system to implement an effective protected area programme. The review indicates that the current organisation and mandate of the protected area authorities precludes them from being effective partners in collaborative management, lacking dedicated staff in both the outreach and livelihood agendas, which severely undermines their participation in collaborative management. This paper recommends that the protected area authority needs to be strengthened and reorganised, in order to play a leading role in village engagement – and a key leading agency in the higher level collaborative management bodies.","PeriodicalId":37571,"journal":{"name":"Parks","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-05-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Parks","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2305/IUCN.CH.2018.PARKS-24-1MSU.EN","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Environmental Science","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

Abstract

The protected area system of Bangladesh in March 2017 comprised 17 national parks covering 45,740 hectares and 21 wildlife sanctuaries covering 394,053 hectares. The Government of Bangladesh introduced collaborative management in these reserves in three successive, expanding phases undertaken between 2003 up until the present time. During this period, the successive programmes introduced an elaborate collaborative management system. This paper evaluates this collaborative management system as well as the protected area management arrangements being promoted, comprising: (i) the Co-management Council, (ii) the Co-management Committee, (iii) the People’s Forum, and (iv) sub-village institutional bodies including the Community Patrol Groups and the Forest User Groups (or the Village Conservation Forums). It assesses the management interventions and the effectiveness of the collaborative management system to implement an effective protected area programme. The review indicates that the current organisation and mandate of the protected area authorities precludes them from being effective partners in collaborative management, lacking dedicated staff in both the outreach and livelihood agendas, which severely undermines their participation in collaborative management. This paper recommends that the protected area authority needs to be strengthened and reorganised, in order to play a leading role in village engagement – and a key leading agency in the higher level collaborative management bodies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评估孟加拉国国家公园和野生动物保护区内的协作管理
截至2017年3月,孟加拉国的保护区系统包括17个国家公园,占地45740公顷,21个野生动物保护区,占地394053公顷。从2003年到现在,孟加拉国政府在三个连续的扩大阶段对这些保护区进行了协作管理。在此期间,相继的方案采用了一种详细的协作管理制度。本文评估了这一协作管理系统以及正在推广的保护区管理安排,包括:(i)共同管理委员会,(ii)共同管理委员会,(iii)人民论坛,以及(iv)包括社区巡逻小组和森林用户小组(或村庄保护论坛)在内的村级机构机构。它评估管理干预措施和协作管理系统的有效性,以执行有效的保护区方案。审查表明,保护区当局目前的组织和授权使他们无法成为协作管理的有效合作伙伴,在外联和生计议程中缺乏专门的工作人员,这严重破坏了他们参与协作管理。本文建议,保护区当局需要得到加强和重组,以便在村庄参与中发挥主导作用,并在更高层次的协作管理机构中发挥关键领导作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Parks
Parks Environmental Science-Nature and Landscape Conservation
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: We aim for PARKS to be a rigorous, challenging publication with high academic credibility and standing. But at the same time the journal is and should remain primarily a resource for people actively involved in establishing and managing protected areas, under any management category or governance type. We aim for the majority of papers accepted to include practical management information. We also work hard to include authors who are involved in management but do not usually find the time to report the results of their research and experience to a wider audience. We welcome submissions from people whose written English is imperfect as long as they have interesting research to report, backed up by firm evidence, and are happy to work with authors to develop papers for the journal. PARKS is published with the aim of strengthening international collaboration in protected area development and management by: • promoting understanding of the values and benefits derived from protected areas to governments, communities, visitors, business etc; • ensuring that protected areas fulfil their primary role in nature conservation while addressing critical issues such as ecologically sustainable development, social justice and climate change adaptation and mitigation; • serving as a leading global forum for the exchange of information on issues relating to protected areas, especially learning from case studies of applied ideas; • publishing articles reporting on recent applied research that is relevant to protected area management; • changing and improving protected area management, policy environment and socio-economic benefits through use of information provided in the journal; and • promoting IUCN’s work on protected areas.
期刊最新文献
Clarifying ‘long-term’ for protected areas and other effective area-based conservation measures (OECMs): why only 25 years of ‘intent’ does not qualify The World Heritage Convention, Protected Areas and Rivers: Challenges for Representation and Implications for International Water Cooperation A crisis of moral ecology: Magar agro-pastoralism in Dhorpatan Hunting Reserve, Nepal The benefits of the IUCN Green List in implementing effective park management in Queensland, Australia Nudging to glory: the World Heritage Convention’s influence in conflict-prone Global South natural sites
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1