Validation of the Specific Activity Scale Hong Kong Chinese Version Among Chinese Patients with Heart Diseases

Wai-Sun Chan, Ka-Keung Wong, Po-Chu Ng, Ka-Yee Fung, Ching-Sheung Chan, Ka-Ching Lung, Sze-Wai Wu
{"title":"Validation of the Specific Activity Scale Hong Kong Chinese Version Among Chinese Patients with Heart Diseases","authors":"Wai-Sun Chan, Ka-Keung Wong, Po-Chu Ng, Ka-Yee Fung, Ching-Sheung Chan, Ka-Ching Lung, Sze-Wai Wu","doi":"10.55503/2790-6744.1005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"CHAN ET AL.: Validation of the Specific Activity Scale Hong Kong Chinese Version among Chinese Patients with Heart Diseases. Background: The interview-based Specific Activity Scale classified cardiac patients into four functional classes based on ability in performing the specific activities with symptom consideration. This tool is widely used by occupational therapist in evaluating the functional performance in cardiac rehabilitation program but it has not been translated into Chinese language. Objective: The objective is to study concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Specific Activity Scale Hong Kong Chinese version (SASHKCV) on patients with heart diseases in Hong Kong. Methods: This was a prospective study where cardiac patients were recruited in day cardiac rehabilitation centres. SASHKCV was conducted twice within 7 days. Metabolic Equivalent (MET) in stress test was collected within study period. Results: 179 patients had completed the SASHKCV and stress test. Patients with recent Myocardial Infarction (MI) during initial assessment were classified as MI group. The other patients were sorted into non-MI group. The results of the test-retest reliability of the MI group was 0.948 (p<0.001), and that of the non-MI group was 0.933 (p<0.001). Total group correlation was 0.944 (p<0.001). Furthermore, the correlation between the functional class of SASHKCV and MET in MI group was 0.459 (p<0.001) and non-MI group was 0.536 (p<0.001). Overall correlation coefficient was 0.496 (p<0.001). Conclusion: SASHKCV is a valid and reliable tool in evaluating","PeriodicalId":53534,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55503/2790-6744.1005","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

CHAN ET AL.: Validation of the Specific Activity Scale Hong Kong Chinese Version among Chinese Patients with Heart Diseases. Background: The interview-based Specific Activity Scale classified cardiac patients into four functional classes based on ability in performing the specific activities with symptom consideration. This tool is widely used by occupational therapist in evaluating the functional performance in cardiac rehabilitation program but it has not been translated into Chinese language. Objective: The objective is to study concurrent validity and test-retest reliability of the Specific Activity Scale Hong Kong Chinese version (SASHKCV) on patients with heart diseases in Hong Kong. Methods: This was a prospective study where cardiac patients were recruited in day cardiac rehabilitation centres. SASHKCV was conducted twice within 7 days. Metabolic Equivalent (MET) in stress test was collected within study period. Results: 179 patients had completed the SASHKCV and stress test. Patients with recent Myocardial Infarction (MI) during initial assessment were classified as MI group. The other patients were sorted into non-MI group. The results of the test-retest reliability of the MI group was 0.948 (p<0.001), and that of the non-MI group was 0.933 (p<0.001). Total group correlation was 0.944 (p<0.001). Furthermore, the correlation between the functional class of SASHKCV and MET in MI group was 0.459 (p<0.001) and non-MI group was 0.536 (p<0.001). Overall correlation coefficient was 0.496 (p<0.001). Conclusion: SASHKCV is a valid and reliable tool in evaluating
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国心脏病患者特异性活动量表香港中文版的验证
《特定活动量表》中文版在中国心脏病患者中的验证。背景:基于访谈的特定活动量表(Specific Activity Scale)将心脏病患者的特定活动能力分为四个功能等级,并考虑到症状。该工具被职业治疗师广泛用于评估心脏康复项目的功能表现,但尚未翻译成中文。目的:研究香港中文版特定活动量表(SASHKCV)对香港地区心脏病患者的并发效度和重测信度。方法:这是一项前瞻性研究,在心脏康复中心招募心脏病患者。SASHKCV在7天内进行了两次。在研究期间收集应激试验中的代谢当量(MET)。结果:179例患者完成了SASHKCV和应激测试。初步评估时新近发生心肌梗死(MI)的患者分为MI组。其余患者分为非心肌梗死组。MI组重测信度为0.948 (p<0.001),非MI组重测信度为0.933 (p<0.001)。组间相关系数为0.944 (p<0.001)。心肌梗死组SASHKCV功能分类与MET的相关性为0.459 (p<0.001),非心肌梗死组为0.536 (p<0.001)。总相关系数为0.496 (p<0.001)。结论:SASHKCV是一种有效、可靠的评价工具
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology
Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology publishes peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of cardiovascular disease, including original clinical studies, review articles and experimental investigations. As official journal of the Hong Kong College of Cardiology, the journal publishes abstracts of reports to be presented at the Scientific Sessions of the College as well as reports of the College-sponsored conferences.
期刊最新文献
31st Annual Scientific Congress of Hong Kong College of Cardiology Abstracts Phaeochromocytoma-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy presented with Cardiogenic Shock Phaeochromocytoma-induced Takotsubo cardiomyopathy presented with Cardiogenic Shock Use of Micra AV in Patients with High-grade Atrioventricular Block in Hong Kong: A Single Center Experience Unusual Manifestation of Atrioventricular Dissociation in A 63 Year-Old Man and Clinical Insights
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1