Flow Cytometric MRD Assessment in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemias

H. Virk, M. Sachdeva
{"title":"Flow Cytometric MRD Assessment in Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemias","authors":"H. Virk, M. Sachdeva","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1766137","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the very first malignancy where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be cardinal tool for guiding therapeutic choices. At present, MRD detection is not only used for the assessment of initial treatment response and subsequent risk stratification but also for monitoring disease burden in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Multicolor flow cytometry (FCM) for the assessment of MRD has been in existence for more than two decades. It is presently the most commonly used technique worldwide for MRD assessment in ALL. The technique has evolved from two to three color assays in its early phases to eight and more color assays in present time, which enables detection of one leukemic cell in 10^4 or more cells. The assessment of MRD is based on analysis of expression of lineage-associated markers and either looking at “leukemia associated immunophenotypes” or identify “different from normal” patterns. A rapid turn-around-time and direct quantification of viable residual leukemic cells are advantages of FCM over molecular techniques of MRD assessment. On the other hand, one of the prime limitations of detection of residual cells by FCM is the immunophenotypic shifts that are observed as a result of chemotherapeutic reagents. In addition, introduction of immunotherapy, especially against important gating markers like CD19, has posed significant challenge to FCM-based MRD assays, and requires modification of antibody panels for an alternate gating and analysis strategy. Finally, standardization and validation of MRD assay and use of internal and external quality controls are extremely important aspects for a clinical laboratory providing MRD reports for patient care.","PeriodicalId":13513,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Medical and Paediatric Oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1766137","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL) is one of the very first malignancy where the assessment of early response to therapy by minimal/measurable residual disease (MRD) monitoring has proven to be cardinal tool for guiding therapeutic choices. At present, MRD detection is not only used for the assessment of initial treatment response and subsequent risk stratification but also for monitoring disease burden in the setting of hematopoietic stem cell transplant. Multicolor flow cytometry (FCM) for the assessment of MRD has been in existence for more than two decades. It is presently the most commonly used technique worldwide for MRD assessment in ALL. The technique has evolved from two to three color assays in its early phases to eight and more color assays in present time, which enables detection of one leukemic cell in 10^4 or more cells. The assessment of MRD is based on analysis of expression of lineage-associated markers and either looking at “leukemia associated immunophenotypes” or identify “different from normal” patterns. A rapid turn-around-time and direct quantification of viable residual leukemic cells are advantages of FCM over molecular techniques of MRD assessment. On the other hand, one of the prime limitations of detection of residual cells by FCM is the immunophenotypic shifts that are observed as a result of chemotherapeutic reagents. In addition, introduction of immunotherapy, especially against important gating markers like CD19, has posed significant challenge to FCM-based MRD assays, and requires modification of antibody panels for an alternate gating and analysis strategy. Finally, standardization and validation of MRD assay and use of internal and external quality controls are extremely important aspects for a clinical laboratory providing MRD reports for patient care.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
急性淋巴细胞白血病的流式细胞术MRD评价
摘要:急性淋巴细胞白血病(ALL)是最早通过微小/可测量残留病(MRD)监测来评估早期治疗反应的恶性肿瘤之一,已被证明是指导治疗选择的主要工具。目前,MRD检测不仅用于评估初始治疗反应和随后的风险分层,还用于监测造血干细胞移植环境下的疾病负担。用于MRD评估的多色流式细胞术(FCM)已经存在了二十多年。这是目前世界上最常用的MRD评估技术。该技术已经从早期的两到三种颜色分析发展到现在的八种或更多的颜色分析,可以在10^4或更多的细胞中检测到一个白血病细胞。MRD的评估是基于对谱系相关标记的表达分析,或者观察“白血病相关免疫表型”,或者识别“与正常不同”的模式。快速的周转时间和直接定量活的残余白血病细胞是FCM相对于MRD评估分子技术的优势。另一方面,FCM检测残留细胞的主要限制之一是由于化疗试剂引起的免疫表型变化。此外,免疫疗法的引入,特别是针对CD19等重要门控标记物的引入,对基于fcm的MRD分析提出了重大挑战,需要修改抗体面板以替代门控和分析策略。最后,MRD分析的标准化和验证以及内部和外部质量控制的使用是临床实验室为患者提供MRD报告的极其重要的方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
91
期刊介绍: The journal will cover technical and clinical studies related to medical and pediatric oncology in human well being including ethical and social issues. Articles with clinical interest and implications will be given preference.
期刊最新文献
Clinical Outcomes of Crizotinib Readministration in Patients with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase Rearrangement: Case Report and Review of Literature Advanced Pediatric-Type Follicular Lymphoma, Consequences of a Late Presentation in a Resource-Poor Setting: Case Report and Literature Review Renal Inflammatory Myofibroblastic Tumor in an Infant: Case Report with Review of Literature Primary Resistance to ALK Inhibitors in a Patient with Nonsmall Cell Lung Cancer with ALK Rearrangement: A Case Report with Review of Literature Approach to Diagnosis of BCR::ABL1 -Negative Myeloproliferative Neoplasms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1