Keyphrase Extraction for Technical Language Processing.

IF 17.7 1区 化学 Q1 CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Accounts of Chemical Research Pub Date : 2022-03-09 eCollection Date: 2021-01-01 DOI:10.6028/jres.126.053
Alden Dima, Aaron Massey
{"title":"Keyphrase Extraction for Technical Language Processing.","authors":"Alden Dima, Aaron Massey","doi":"10.6028/jres.126.053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Keyphrase extraction is an important facet of annotation tools that offer the provision of the metadata necessary for technical language processing (TLP). Because TLP imposes additional requirements on typical natural language processing (NLP) methods, we examined TLP keyphrase extraction through the lens of a hypothetical toolkit which consists of a combination of text features and classifers suitable for use in low-resource TLP applications. We compared two approaches for keyphrase extraction: The frst which applied our toolkit-based methods that used only distributional features of words and phrases, and the second was the Maui automatic topic indexer, a well-known academic method. Performance was measured against two collections of technical literature: 1153 articles from Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics (JCT) curated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Thermodynamics Research Center (TRC) and 244 articles from Task 5 of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval). Both collections have author-provided keyphrases available; the SemEval articles also have reader-provided keyphrases. Our fndings indicate that our toolkit approach was competitive with Maui when author-provided keyphrases were frst removed from the text. For the TRC-JCT articles, the Maui automatic topic indexer reported an F-measure of 29.4 % while our toolkit approach obtained an F-measure of 28.2 %. For the SemEval articles, our toolkit approach using a Naïve Bayes classifer resulted in an F-measure of 20.8 %, which outperformed Maui's F-measure of 18.8 %.</p>","PeriodicalId":1,"journal":{"name":"Accounts of Chemical Research","volume":" ","pages":"126053"},"PeriodicalIF":17.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11249704/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accounts of Chemical Research","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.6028/jres.126.053","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"化学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2021/1/1 0:00:00","PubModel":"eCollection","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Keyphrase extraction is an important facet of annotation tools that offer the provision of the metadata necessary for technical language processing (TLP). Because TLP imposes additional requirements on typical natural language processing (NLP) methods, we examined TLP keyphrase extraction through the lens of a hypothetical toolkit which consists of a combination of text features and classifers suitable for use in low-resource TLP applications. We compared two approaches for keyphrase extraction: The frst which applied our toolkit-based methods that used only distributional features of words and phrases, and the second was the Maui automatic topic indexer, a well-known academic method. Performance was measured against two collections of technical literature: 1153 articles from Journal of Chemical Thermodynamics (JCT) curated by the National Institute of Standards and Technology Thermodynamics Research Center (TRC) and 244 articles from Task 5 of the Workshop on Semantic Evaluation (SemEval). Both collections have author-provided keyphrases available; the SemEval articles also have reader-provided keyphrases. Our fndings indicate that our toolkit approach was competitive with Maui when author-provided keyphrases were frst removed from the text. For the TRC-JCT articles, the Maui automatic topic indexer reported an F-measure of 29.4 % while our toolkit approach obtained an F-measure of 28.2 %. For the SemEval articles, our toolkit approach using a Naïve Bayes classifer resulted in an F-measure of 20.8 %, which outperformed Maui's F-measure of 18.8 %.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
面向技术语言处理的关键词提取
关键字提取是注释工具的一个重要方面,它提供了技术语言处理(TLP)所需的元数据。由于TLP对典型的自然语言处理(NLP)方法施加了额外的要求,因此我们通过一个假设的工具包来研究TLP关键短语提取,该工具包由适合于低资源TLP应用程序的文本特征和分类器组合组成。我们比较了两种关键字提取方法:第一种是使用基于工具包的方法,只使用单词和短语的分布特征,第二种是Maui自动主题索引器,这是一种著名的学术方法。性能是根据两个技术文献集来衡量的:1153篇来自美国国家标准与技术热力学研究中心(TRC)管理的《化学热力学杂志》(JCT)的文章和244篇来自语义评估研讨会(SemEval)任务5的文章。这两个集合都有作者提供的关键字可用;SemEval文章也有读者提供的关键字。我们的研究结果表明,当作者提供的关键短语首次从文本中删除时,我们的工具包方法与Maui具有竞争力。对于TRC-JCT文章,Maui自动主题索引器报告的F -度量为29.4%,而我们的工具包方法获得的F -度量为28.2%。对于SemEval文章,我们使用Naïve贝叶斯分类器的工具包方法的F -度量值为20.8%,优于Maui的F -度量值18.8%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Accounts of Chemical Research
Accounts of Chemical Research 化学-化学综合
CiteScore
31.40
自引率
1.10%
发文量
312
审稿时长
2 months
期刊介绍: Accounts of Chemical Research presents short, concise and critical articles offering easy-to-read overviews of basic research and applications in all areas of chemistry and biochemistry. These short reviews focus on research from the author’s own laboratory and are designed to teach the reader about a research project. In addition, Accounts of Chemical Research publishes commentaries that give an informed opinion on a current research problem. Special Issues online are devoted to a single topic of unusual activity and significance. Accounts of Chemical Research replaces the traditional article abstract with an article "Conspectus." These entries synopsize the research affording the reader a closer look at the content and significance of an article. Through this provision of a more detailed description of the article contents, the Conspectus enhances the article's discoverability by search engines and the exposure for the research.
期刊最新文献
The Utility of Chain-End Degradation for De Novo Sequencing of Sequence-Defined Oligourethanes Helix-Sense Selective Polymerization versus Polymerization-Induced Helix-Sense Selective Self-Assembly: From Controlled Synthesis to in Situ Chiral Self-Assembly Resonance Variation-Based Dynamically Adaptive Organic Optoelectronic Materials. Fluorescent Ultrashort Nanotubes Photon Management in Photochemical Synthesis and Reactor Scale-Up.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1