Estimate of Patients With Missed Seizures Because of Delay in Conventional EEG.

IF 4.7 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-03-01 Epub Date: 2022-07-05 DOI:10.1097/WNP.0000000000000957
Safoora Fatima, Parimala Velpula Krishnamurthy, Mengzhen Sun, Mariel Kalkach Aparicio, Klevest Gjini, Aaron F Struck
{"title":"Estimate of Patients With Missed Seizures Because of Delay in Conventional EEG.","authors":"Safoora Fatima, Parimala Velpula Krishnamurthy, Mengzhen Sun, Mariel Kalkach Aparicio, Klevest Gjini, Aaron F Struck","doi":"10.1097/WNP.0000000000000957","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>There is frequent delay between ordering and placement of conventional EEG. Here we estimate how many patients had seizures during this delay.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>Two hundred fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent conventional EEG monitoring at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were retrospectively chart reviewed for demographics, time of EEG order, clinical and other EEG-related information. Patients were stratified by use of anti-seizure medications before EEG and into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups based on 2HELPS2B score (0, 1, or >1). Monte Carlo simulations (500 trials) were performed to estimate seizures during delay.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The median delay from EEG order to performing EEG was 2.00 hours (range of 0.5-8.00 hours) in the total cohort. For EEGs ordered after-hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-8.00 hours), and during business hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-6.00 hours). The place of EEG, intensive care unit, emergency department, and general floor, did not show significant difference (P = 0.84). Anti-seizure medication did not affect time to first seizure in the low-risk (P = 0.37), medium-risk (P = 0.44), or high-risk (P = 0.12) groups. The estimated % of patients who had a seizure in the delay period for low-risk group (2HELPS2B = 0) was 0.8%, for the medium-risk group (2HELPS2B = 1) was 10.3%, and for the high-risk group (2HELPS2B > 1) was 17.6%, and overall risk was 7.2%.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>The University of Wisconsin Hospital with 24-hour in-house EEG technologists has a median delay of 2 hours from order to start of EEG, shorter than published reports from other centers. Nonetheless, seizures were likely missed in about 7.2% of patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":" ","pages":"230-235"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10912745/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/WNP.0000000000000957","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2022/7/5 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Purpose: There is frequent delay between ordering and placement of conventional EEG. Here we estimate how many patients had seizures during this delay.

Methods: Two hundred fifty consecutive adult patients who underwent conventional EEG monitoring at the University of Wisconsin Hospital were retrospectively chart reviewed for demographics, time of EEG order, clinical and other EEG-related information. Patients were stratified by use of anti-seizure medications before EEG and into low-risk, medium-risk, and high-risk groups based on 2HELPS2B score (0, 1, or >1). Monte Carlo simulations (500 trials) were performed to estimate seizures during delay.

Results: The median delay from EEG order to performing EEG was 2.00 hours (range of 0.5-8.00 hours) in the total cohort. For EEGs ordered after-hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-8.00 hours), and during business hours, it was 2.00 hours (range 0.5-6.00 hours). The place of EEG, intensive care unit, emergency department, and general floor, did not show significant difference (P = 0.84). Anti-seizure medication did not affect time to first seizure in the low-risk (P = 0.37), medium-risk (P = 0.44), or high-risk (P = 0.12) groups. The estimated % of patients who had a seizure in the delay period for low-risk group (2HELPS2B = 0) was 0.8%, for the medium-risk group (2HELPS2B = 1) was 10.3%, and for the high-risk group (2HELPS2B > 1) was 17.6%, and overall risk was 7.2%.

Conclusions: The University of Wisconsin Hospital with 24-hour in-house EEG technologists has a median delay of 2 hours from order to start of EEG, shorter than published reports from other centers. Nonetheless, seizures were likely missed in about 7.2% of patients.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
因常规脑电图延迟而错过癫痫发作患者的评估
目的:常规脑电图从下单到放置之间经常出现延迟。在此,我们估算了有多少患者在这一延迟期间癫痫发作:我们对威斯康星大学医院连续接受常规脑电图监测的 250 名成年患者进行了病历回顾,以了解其人口统计学特征、下达脑电图指令的时间、临床及其他与脑电图相关的信息。根据脑电图前抗癫痫药物的使用情况对患者进行分层,并根据 2HELPS2B 评分(0、1 或 >1)将患者分为低风险组、中风险组和高风险组。进行蒙特卡罗模拟(500 次试验)以估计延迟期间的癫痫发作情况:从下达脑电图指令到进行脑电图检查的中位延迟时间为 2.00 小时(范围为 0.5-8.00 小时)。下班后下达脑电图指令的延迟时间为 2.00 小时(范围为 0.5-8.00 小时),上班时间为 2.00 小时(范围为 0.5-6.00 小时)。脑电图检查地点、重症监护室、急诊科和普通楼层没有明显差异(P = 0.84)。抗癫痫药物对低风险组(P = 0.37)、中风险组(P = 0.44)和高风险组(P = 0.12)的首次癫痫发作时间没有影响。据估计,低风险组(2HELPS2B = 0)在延迟期内发作的患者比例为 0.8%,中风险组(2HELPS2B = 1)为 10.3%,高风险组(2HELPS2B > 1)为 17.6%,总体风险为 7.2%:威斯康星大学附属医院拥有 24 小时的内部脑电图技师,从下订单到开始脑电图检查的中位延迟时间为 2 小时,短于其他中心的公开报告。尽管如此,仍有约 7.2% 的患者可能错过了癫痫发作。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊介绍: ACS Applied Bio Materials is an interdisciplinary journal publishing original research covering all aspects of biomaterials and biointerfaces including and beyond the traditional biosensing, biomedical and therapeutic applications. The journal is devoted to reports of new and original experimental and theoretical research of an applied nature that integrates knowledge in the areas of materials, engineering, physics, bioscience, and chemistry into important bio applications. The journal is specifically interested in work that addresses the relationship between structure and function and assesses the stability and degradation of materials under relevant environmental and biological conditions.
期刊最新文献
Biocompatible Lubricant-Coated Flexible Neural Probes with Enhanced Long-Term Recording Stability. One-Step Pulsed Electrodeposition of ZnO/ZnP Composite Coatings on Titanium Implants for Enhanced Antibacterial Activity and Biocompatibility. Plasmonic Nanotheranostics: Merging Imaging and Therapy on a Unified Platform for Precision Oncology. Smart Macrocycles: Cyclodextrin-Porphyrin Photosensitizers for Photodynamic Therapy in Human Bladder Cancer Cells. Design and Photophysical Engineering of Functional Organic Luminogens for Precision Cancer Theranostics.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1