Free fatty acid receptors: structural models and elucidation of ligand binding interactions

IF 2.222 Q3 Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology BMC Structural Biology Pub Date : 2015-09-07 DOI:10.1186/s12900-015-0044-2
Irina G. Tikhonova, Elena Poerio
{"title":"Free fatty acid receptors: structural models and elucidation of ligand binding interactions","authors":"Irina G. Tikhonova,&nbsp;Elena Poerio","doi":"10.1186/s12900-015-0044-2","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The free fatty acid receptors (FFAs), including FFA1 (orphan name: GPR40), FFA2 (GPR43) and FFA3 (GPR41) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involved in energy and metabolic homeostasis. Understanding the structural basis of ligand binding at FFAs is an essential step toward designing potent and selective small molecule modulators.</p><p>We analyse earlier homology models of FFAs in light of the newly published FFA1 crystal structure co-crystallized with TAK-875, an ago-allosteric ligand, focusing on the architecture of the extracellular binding cavity and agonist-receptor interactions. The previous low-resolution homology models of FFAs were helpful in highlighting the location of the ligand binding site and the key residues for ligand anchoring. However, homology models were not accurate in establishing the nature of all ligand-receptor contacts and the precise ligand-binding mode. From analysis of structural models and mutagenesis, it appears that the position of helices 3, 4 and 5 is crucial in ligand docking. The FFA1-based homology models of FFA2 and FFA3 were constructed and used to compare the FFA subtypes. From docking studies we propose an alternative binding mode for orthosteric agonists at FFA1 and FFA2, involving the interhelical space between helices 4 and 5. This binding mode can explain mutagenesis results for residues at positions 4.56 and 5.42. The novel FFAs structural models highlight higher aromaticity of the FFA2 binding cavity and higher hydrophilicity of the FFA3 binding cavity. The role of the residues at the second extracellular loop used in mutagenesis is reanalysed. The third positively-charged residue in the binding cavity of FFAs, located in helix 2, is identified and predicted to coordinate allosteric modulators.</p><p>The novel structural models of FFAs provide information on specific modes of ligand binding at FFA subtypes and new suggestions for mutagenesis and ligand modification, guiding the development of novel orthosteric and allosteric chemical probes to validate the importance of FFAs in metabolic and inflammatory conditions. Using our FFA homology modelling experience, a strategy to model a GPCR, which is phylogenetically distant from GPCRs with the available crystal structures, is discussed.</p>","PeriodicalId":498,"journal":{"name":"BMC Structural Biology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2220,"publicationDate":"2015-09-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1186/s12900-015-0044-2","citationCount":"36","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Structural Biology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12900-015-0044-2","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 36

Abstract

The free fatty acid receptors (FFAs), including FFA1 (orphan name: GPR40), FFA2 (GPR43) and FFA3 (GPR41) are G protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs) involved in energy and metabolic homeostasis. Understanding the structural basis of ligand binding at FFAs is an essential step toward designing potent and selective small molecule modulators.

We analyse earlier homology models of FFAs in light of the newly published FFA1 crystal structure co-crystallized with TAK-875, an ago-allosteric ligand, focusing on the architecture of the extracellular binding cavity and agonist-receptor interactions. The previous low-resolution homology models of FFAs were helpful in highlighting the location of the ligand binding site and the key residues for ligand anchoring. However, homology models were not accurate in establishing the nature of all ligand-receptor contacts and the precise ligand-binding mode. From analysis of structural models and mutagenesis, it appears that the position of helices 3, 4 and 5 is crucial in ligand docking. The FFA1-based homology models of FFA2 and FFA3 were constructed and used to compare the FFA subtypes. From docking studies we propose an alternative binding mode for orthosteric agonists at FFA1 and FFA2, involving the interhelical space between helices 4 and 5. This binding mode can explain mutagenesis results for residues at positions 4.56 and 5.42. The novel FFAs structural models highlight higher aromaticity of the FFA2 binding cavity and higher hydrophilicity of the FFA3 binding cavity. The role of the residues at the second extracellular loop used in mutagenesis is reanalysed. The third positively-charged residue in the binding cavity of FFAs, located in helix 2, is identified and predicted to coordinate allosteric modulators.

The novel structural models of FFAs provide information on specific modes of ligand binding at FFA subtypes and new suggestions for mutagenesis and ligand modification, guiding the development of novel orthosteric and allosteric chemical probes to validate the importance of FFAs in metabolic and inflammatory conditions. Using our FFA homology modelling experience, a strategy to model a GPCR, which is phylogenetically distant from GPCRs with the available crystal structures, is discussed.

Abstract Image

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
游离脂肪酸受体:结构模型和配体结合相互作用的阐释
游离脂肪酸受体(FFAs),包括FFA1(孤儿名:GPR40), FFA2 (GPR43)和FFA3 (GPR41)是参与能量和代谢稳态的G蛋白偶联受体(gpcr)。了解游离脂肪酸配体结合的结构基础是设计有效和选择性小分子调节剂的重要一步。我们根据新发表的与ak -875(一种ago-allosteric配体)共结晶的FFA1晶体结构分析了FFAs的早期同源模型,重点研究了细胞外结合腔的结构和激动剂-受体的相互作用。先前的低分辨率FFAs同源模型有助于突出配体结合位点的位置和配体锚定的关键残基。然而,同源性模型在建立所有配体-受体接触的性质和精确的配体结合模式方面并不准确。从结构模型和诱变分析来看,螺旋3,4,5的位置在配体对接中起着至关重要的作用。构建基于ffa1的FFA2和FFA3的同源性模型,用于比较FFA亚型。通过对接研究,我们提出了FFA1和FFA2正畸受体激动剂的另一种结合模式,涉及螺旋4和5之间的螺旋间隙。这种结合模式可以解释4.56和5.42位点残基的诱变结果。新的FFAs结构模型突出了FFA2结合腔具有较高的芳香性和FFA3结合腔具有较高的亲水性。重新分析了用于诱变的第二胞外环残基的作用。FFAs结合腔中的第三个带正电的残基位于螺旋2上,被确定并预测为协调变构调节剂。新的FFAs结构模型提供了关于FFA亚型配体结合的特定模式的信息,并为诱变和配体修饰提供了新的建议,指导了新型正构和变构化学探针的发展,以验证FFAs在代谢和炎症条件中的重要性。利用我们的FFA同源性建模经验,讨论了一种建模策略,该策略与具有可用晶体结构的GPCR在系统发育上距离较远。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
BMC Structural Biology
BMC Structural Biology 生物-生物物理
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: BMC Structural Biology is an open access, peer-reviewed journal that considers articles on investigations into the structure of biological macromolecules, including solving structures, structural and functional analyses, and computational modeling.
期刊最新文献
Characterization of putative proteins encoded by variable ORFs in white spot syndrome virus genome Correction to: Classification of the human THAP protein family identifies an evolutionarily conserved coiled coil region Effect of low complexity regions within the PvMSP3α block II on the tertiary structure of the protein and implications to immune escape mechanisms QRNAS: software tool for refinement of nucleic acid structures Classification of the human THAP protein family identifies an evolutionarily conserved coiled coil region
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1