Institutions for European Energy Cooperation : Dyadic Data Analysis of Electricity Network Interconnections

IF 0.1 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Korean Journal of International Studies Pub Date : 2017-12-31 DOI:10.14731/kjis.2017.12.15.3.421
Hyodong Sohn, Taedong Lee
{"title":"Institutions for European Energy Cooperation : Dyadic Data Analysis of Electricity Network Interconnections","authors":"Hyodong Sohn, Taedong Lee","doi":"10.14731/kjis.2017.12.15.3.421","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Europe is the region that has pursued regional cooperation and integration most enthusiastically. The integration of energy systems is what Europe seeks to have synergistic effects. This study examines European energy cooperation by focusing on the driving factors of electricity network interconnections measured as electricity exchange flows. Considering the socioeconomic conditions and the benefits and costs of electricity system integration, it is puzzling why some countries’ electricity systems have been connected and have significant electricity flows, while others do not. Furthermore, this study asks what political, institutional, and economic drivers influence the different levels of electricity exchange flows between European countries. While extant studies have looked at the dynamics of energy cooperation, studies to understand electricity network cooperation and integration have been rare. To fill this gap, this study explains the variation of exchange flows by analyzing the dyadic data of 41 European countries in 2013. The statistical analysis suggests that the degree of current policy coordination of regional transmission system operator networks is positively associated with the level of current exchange flows. However, not all institutions are effective in increasing electricity flows. This finding implies that the experience of energy cooperation through effective institutions, along with geographic proximity and the economic benefits of trade, increases electricity network interconnections.","PeriodicalId":41543,"journal":{"name":"Korean Journal of International Studies","volume":"15 1","pages":"421-447"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Korean Journal of International Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14731/kjis.2017.12.15.3.421","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Europe is the region that has pursued regional cooperation and integration most enthusiastically. The integration of energy systems is what Europe seeks to have synergistic effects. This study examines European energy cooperation by focusing on the driving factors of electricity network interconnections measured as electricity exchange flows. Considering the socioeconomic conditions and the benefits and costs of electricity system integration, it is puzzling why some countries’ electricity systems have been connected and have significant electricity flows, while others do not. Furthermore, this study asks what political, institutional, and economic drivers influence the different levels of electricity exchange flows between European countries. While extant studies have looked at the dynamics of energy cooperation, studies to understand electricity network cooperation and integration have been rare. To fill this gap, this study explains the variation of exchange flows by analyzing the dyadic data of 41 European countries in 2013. The statistical analysis suggests that the degree of current policy coordination of regional transmission system operator networks is positively associated with the level of current exchange flows. However, not all institutions are effective in increasing electricity flows. This finding implies that the experience of energy cooperation through effective institutions, along with geographic proximity and the economic benefits of trade, increases electricity network interconnections.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
欧洲能源合作机构:电网互联的二元数据分析
欧洲是最热衷于区域合作与一体化的地区。能源系统的一体化是欧洲寻求的协同效应。这项研究通过关注以电力交换流量衡量的电网互联的驱动因素来考察欧洲能源合作。考虑到社会经济条件以及电力系统整合的效益和成本,令人费解的是,为什么一些国家的电力系统已经连接并有大量的电力流动,而另一些国家却没有。此外,这项研究还询问了是什么政治、制度和经济驱动因素影响了欧洲国家之间不同水平的电力交换流动。虽然现有的研究着眼于能源合作的动态,但了解电网合作和整合的研究却很少。为了填补这一空白,本研究通过分析2013年41个欧洲国家的二元数据来解释外汇流量的变化。统计分析表明,区域输电系统运营商网络当前政策协调程度与当前汇率水平呈正相关。然而,并非所有机构都能有效地增加电力流量。这一发现意味着,通过有效机构进行能源合作的经验,加上地理位置接近和贸易的经济效益,增加了电网的互联互通。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Korean Journal of International Studies
Korean Journal of International Studies INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
CRUDE POWER: How Oil Affects Military Capacity and Institutions The Moderating Effects of Official Development Assistance on the Relationship between Foreign Direct Investment and Human Development The Nord Stream pipe dream: How an outdated Ostpolitik misguided Germany’s foreign policy toward Russia Why Restrict Emigration: Autocrats’ Economic Ideas in Uzbekistan and Tajikistan Supply Chain Security in the Age of Techno-Geopolitics: ‘Fab 4’ Case in the Semiconductor Industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1