The Geopolitics of Public Memory: The Challenge and Promise of Transnational Comfort Women Activism

IF 1.4 Q2 COMMUNICATION Womens Studies in Communication Pub Date : 2021-09-22 DOI:10.1080/07491409.2021.1954119
M. Nadesan, Linda J. Kim
{"title":"The Geopolitics of Public Memory: The Challenge and Promise of Transnational Comfort Women Activism","authors":"M. Nadesan, Linda J. Kim","doi":"10.1080/07491409.2021.1954119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Japan conscripted a disputed number of “comfort women” to sexually service their soldiers in occupied territories during World War II. In the aftermath of war, this apparatus was ignored by international diplomacy, and few survivors related their experiences as sex slaves. However, during the early 1990s, sexual crimes against women achieved international attention, emboldened by and emboldening silence breakers whose personal experiences were both affirmed and negated by competing global stakeholders. Activists seeking recognition of and reparations for crimes against survivors of Japan’s comfort women system have since deployed memorials to contest Japan’s position that comfort women were sex workers. These memorials materially instantiate the conflicted interpretations of the scope and severity of Japan’s war crimes, whose undecidability signifies ruptures in the contemporary symbolic order of the United States, Japan, and South Korea alliance. This project examines how online audiences construct the meanings of the highly contested 2017 San Francisco memorial.","PeriodicalId":46136,"journal":{"name":"Womens Studies in Communication","volume":"45 1","pages":"123 - 142"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Womens Studies in Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07491409.2021.1954119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Japan conscripted a disputed number of “comfort women” to sexually service their soldiers in occupied territories during World War II. In the aftermath of war, this apparatus was ignored by international diplomacy, and few survivors related their experiences as sex slaves. However, during the early 1990s, sexual crimes against women achieved international attention, emboldened by and emboldening silence breakers whose personal experiences were both affirmed and negated by competing global stakeholders. Activists seeking recognition of and reparations for crimes against survivors of Japan’s comfort women system have since deployed memorials to contest Japan’s position that comfort women were sex workers. These memorials materially instantiate the conflicted interpretations of the scope and severity of Japan’s war crimes, whose undecidability signifies ruptures in the contemporary symbolic order of the United States, Japan, and South Korea alliance. This project examines how online audiences construct the meanings of the highly contested 2017 San Francisco memorial.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
公共记忆的地缘政治:跨国慰安妇行动主义的挑战与希望
第二次世界大战期间,日本征召了数量有争议的“慰安妇”为被占领土上的士兵提供性服务。在战争结束后,这个机构被国际外交所忽视,很少有幸存者讲述他们作为性奴隶的经历。然而,在20世纪90年代初,针对妇女的性犯罪引起了国际关注,这些人的个人经历被相互竞争的全球利益攸关方既肯定又否定。自那以后,寻求承认对日本慰安妇制度幸存者犯下的罪行并对其进行赔偿的活动人士建立了纪念碑,质疑日本认为慰安妇是性工作者的立场。这些纪念碑在物质上体现了对日本战争罪行的范围和严重程度的相互矛盾的解释,其不可确定性标志着当代美、日、韩联盟象征性秩序的破裂。这个项目考察了在线观众如何构建备受争议的2017年旧金山纪念馆的意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
期刊最新文献
Palestine on the Air Feminist Mentoring in Academia Grassroots Activisms: Public Rhetorics in Localized Contexts Mean Girl Feminism Mommy Needs Her Chardonnay in a Sippy Cup: How Mothers Make Sense of “Wine Mom” Messages and Their Effects on Mothering
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1